Literature DB >> 26028844

Comparison of the effectiveness of lidocaine in permanent maxillary teeth removal performed with single buccal infiltration versus routine buccal and palatal injection.

Ramesh Kumaresan1, Balamanikanda Srinivasan1, Sivakumar Pendayala1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: For many dental patients, palatal injection proves to be a very traumatic experience. Diverse methods have been suggested to reduce the discomfort of palatal injection. Nevertheless, the reliability of these methods is not obviously evident and they are not found to be universally effective. The desirable method to evade pain during palatal injection is just not to have one. Hence, the present study aims at investigating if lidocaine hydrochloride could provide palatal anesthesia in maxilla when only a buccal infiltration anesthesia is done for teeth extraction. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred and fifty patients requiring extraction of maxillary teeth were included in the study. Patients were randomly allotted to two groups, study and control. Patients in study group received a single buccal infiltration of 1.5 mL of lidocaine with epinephrine for extraction of maxillary teeth. Patients in control group received 1.5 mL of buccal and 0.3 mL of palatal infiltration of lidocaine with epinephrine for the extraction. After achieving adequate palatal anesthesia the tooth was extracted with consistent technique. Pain level experienced by the patients during injection procedure and during tooth extraction was rated in an 11-point pain rating scale. Time taken to achieve palatal anesthesia following a single buccal infiltration of anesthetic solution was evaluated by regular pin-prick evaluation of palatal tissues.
RESULTS: The overall success rate of palatal anesthesia achieved with a single buccal infiltration is 81.3 %. The success rate reduced as we proceed from anterior to posterior maxilla. Time taken to achieve successful palatal anesthesia by single buccal infiltration is 7-9 min.
CONCLUSION: The extraction of permanent maxillary anterior teeth and premolars is possible by depositing local anesthesia to the buccal vestibule of the tooth without palatal supplementation. However, the extraction of permanent maxillary posterior teeth with similar technique would result in fewer success rates suggesting its avoidance.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Lidocaine diffusion; Maxillary teeth extraction; Palatal anesthesia

Year:  2014        PMID: 26028844      PMCID: PMC4444690          DOI: 10.1007/s12663-014-0624-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg        ISSN: 0972-8270


  25 in total

1.  Use of EMLA: is it an injection free alternative?

Authors:  A K Munshi; A M Hegde; R Latha
Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 1.065

2.  Reduced discomfort during palatal injection.

Authors:  W R Aslin
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.634

3.  Contributing factors and symptoms of stress in dental practice.

Authors:  M Frazer
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1992 Aug 8-22       Impact factor: 1.626

4.  The palatal press and roll anesthesia technique.

Authors:  Joseph Kravitz
Journal:  Pract Proced Aesthet Dent       Date:  2006-05

5.  A comparison of the anesthetic efficacy of articaine and lidocaine in patients with irreversible pulpitis.

Authors:  Isabel Peixoto Tortamano; Marcelo Siviero; Carina Gisele Costa; Inês Aparecida Buscariolo; Paschoal Laércio Armonia
Journal:  J Endod       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 4.171

6.  A comparison of topical anaesthesia and electronic nerve stimulation for reducing the pain of intra-oral injections.

Authors:  J G Meechan; R A Winter
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  1996-11-09       Impact factor: 1.626

7.  Painless palatal anesthesia.

Authors:  B F McArdle
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.634

8.  Is it possible to anesthetize palatal tissues with buccal 4% articaine injection?

Authors:  Ilker Ozeç; Ufuk Taşdemir; Cesur Gümüş; Orhan Solak
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2010-03-12       Impact factor: 1.895

Review 9.  A 21st century computerized injection system for local pain control.

Authors:  M J Friedman; M N Hochman
Journal:  Compend Contin Educ Dent       Date:  1997-10

10.  Is palatal injection mandatory prior to extraction of permanent maxillary tooth: a preliminary study.

Authors:  G Raja Sekhar; T Nagaraju; V Nandagopal; R Sudheer
Journal:  Indian J Dent Res       Date:  2011 Jan-Feb
View more
  6 in total

1.  The Effectiveness of Articaine and Lidocaine Single Buccal Infiltration versus Conventional Buccal and Palatal Injection Using Lidocaine during Primary Maxillary Molar Extraction: A Randomized Control Trial.

Authors:  Naveen Kumar Reddy Kolli; S V S G Nirmala; Sivakumar Nuvvula
Journal:  Anesth Essays Res       Date:  2017 Jan-Mar

Review 2.  Anesthetic efficacies of buccal with palatal injection versus buccal with intra-septal injection in permanent maxillary first molars of pediatric patients.

Authors:  Peecharat Areenoo; Chanika Manmontri; Nattakan Chaipattanawan; Papimon Chompu-Inwai; Manop Khanijou; Thongnard Kumchai; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2022-07-26

3.  Comparison of Ropivacaine 0.75 % and Lignocaine 2 % with 1:200,000 Adrenaline in Dental Extractions: Single Blind Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Vishal Bansal; Deval Kumar; Apoorva Mowar; Avi Bansal
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2016-04-20

4.  Single buccal infiltration of high concentration lignocaine versus articaine in maxillary third molar surgery.

Authors:  Hnin Ei Phyo; Teeranut Chaiyasamut; Sirichai Kiattavorncharoen; Verasak Pairuchvej; Bishwa Prakash Bhattarai; Natthamet Wongsirichat
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-27

5.  Anesthetic Efficacy of Single Buccal Infiltration of 4% Articaine and 2% Lignocaine in Extraction of Maxillary 1st Molar.

Authors:  D Prasanna Kumar; Mandeep Sharma; Vinay Patil; Rohit Singh Subedar; G Vijaya Lakshmi; Nithin Varalakonda Manjunath
Journal:  Ann Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2019 Jul-Dec

6.  Anesthetic efficacy and safety of 2% lidocaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline and 4% articaine hydrochloride with 1:100,000 adrenaline as a single buccal injection in the extraction of maxillary premolars for orthodontic purposes.

Authors:  Nupoor Deshpande; Anendd Jadhav; Nitin Bhola; Manan Gupta
Journal:  J Dent Anesth Pain Med       Date:  2020-08-27
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.