Literature DB >> 19241157

Decreased TGFbeta signaling and increased COX2 expression in high risk women with increased mammographic breast density.

Wei Tse Yang1, Michael T Lewis, Kenneth Hess, Helen Wong, Anna Tsimelzon, Nese Karadag, Michelina Cairo, Caimaio Wei, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Powel Brown, Banu Arun, Gabriel N Hortobagyi, Aysegul Sahin, Jenny C Chang.   

Abstract

High mammographic density is associated with a increased risk of breast cancer. We hypothesized that specific pathways exist that are associated with increased mammographic density, and may therefore be used to identify potential targets for chemoprevention. Histologically confirmed normal breast tissue was collected from women undergoing breast surgery who had available demographic data and mammograms for review. Women with low versus high mammographic breast density were compared. Differentially expressed genes using Affymetrix HG U133Plus2 chips were identified in dense versus non-dense tissue. Immunohistochemical analysis (IHC) of estrogen receptor, progesterone receptor, Ki67, and COX2 expression was performed. About 66 women were identified, 28 (42%) had high, and 38 (58%) had low mammographic density. About 73 genes had differential expression between normal breast tissue with high and low mammographic density (P < 0.001, fold change > or = 1.5 with a low false discovery rate (<10%). Network and canonical pathway analysis indicated decreased TGFbeta signaling (TGFBR2, SOS, SMAD3, CD44 and TNFRSF11B) in dense breast tissue relative to non-dense breast. By IHC, only COX2 expression in the stroma was statistically significant on multivariate analysis. TGFbeta ligands are currently the only growth factors known to prevent mammary epithelial cell proliferation. TGFbeta signaling has been reported to be inhibited by COX-2, and these molecules are highly differentially expressed in individuals at high risk of developing breast cancer. These results strongly suggest that COX2 inhibition should be investigated for breast cancer prevention despite possible increase in cardiovascular risk.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19241157      PMCID: PMC5921048          DOI: 10.1007/s10549-009-0350-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat        ISSN: 0167-6806            Impact factor:   4.872


  37 in total

1.  Mammographic patterns as a predictive biomarker of breast cancer risk: effect of tamoxifen.

Authors:  C Atkinson; R Warren; S A Bingham; N E Day
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 4.254

Review 2.  Mammographic density as a marker of susceptibility to breast cancer: a hypothesis.

Authors:  N F Boyd; G A Lockwood; L J Martin; J W Byng; M J Yaffe; D L Tritchler
Journal:  IARC Sci Publ       Date:  2001

3.  Biological significance of interventions that change breast density.

Authors:  Rowan T Chlebowski; Anne McTiernan
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 13.506

4.  Using the gene ontology for microarray data mining: a comparison of methods and application to age effects in human prefrontal cortex.

Authors:  Paul Pavlidis; Jie Qin; Victoria Arango; John J Mann; Etienne Sibille
Journal:  Neurochem Res       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.996

5.  Quantitative assessment of mammographic breast density: relationship with breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Jennifer A Harvey; Viktor E Bovbjerg
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-11-14       Impact factor: 11.105

6.  Digitized mammography: a clinical trial of postmenopausal women randomly assigned to receive raloxifene, estrogen, or placebo.

Authors:  M Freedman; J San Martin; J O'Gorman; S Eckert; M E Lippman; S C Lo; E L Walls; J Zeng
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2001-01-03       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Mammographic density as a surrogate marker for the effects of hormone therapy on risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Lisa J Martin; Qing Li; Limei Sun; Anna M Chiarelli; Greg Hislop; Martin J Yaffe; Salomon Minkin
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 4.254

8.  Role of prostaglandin E2-dependent angiogenic switch in cyclooxygenase 2-induced breast cancer progression.

Authors:  Sung-Hee Chang; Catherine H Liu; Rebecca Conway; David K Han; Kasem Nithipatikom; Ovidiu C Trifan; Timothy F Lane; Timothy Hla
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2003-12-19       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Prevention strategies with aromatase inhibitors.

Authors:  Paul E Goss; Kathrin Strasser-Weippl
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2004-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

10.  Relationship between mammographic breast density and tamoxifen in women with breast cancer.

Authors:  Amy Tiersten; Yin Y Ng; Eliza Pile-Spellman; Caron Nelsen; Wanda Noguera-Irizarry; Rebecca Brafman; Donna Russo; Andrea Troxel; Alan Johnson
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2004 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.431

View more
  32 in total

1.  CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues.

Authors:  Rosa Anna DeFilippis; Hang Chang; Nancy Dumont; Joseph T Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Gerald V Fontenay; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Jianxin Zhao; Donglei Hu; James J Marx; Judy A Tjoe; Elad Ziv; Maria Febbraio; Karla Kerlikowske; Bahram Parvin; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 39.397

2.  The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density.

Authors:  Kylie L Gorringe; Ian G Campbell; Dane Cheasley; Lisa Devereux; Siobhan Hughes; Carolyn Nickson; Pietro Procopio; Grant Lee; Na Li; Vicki Pridmore; Kenneth Elder; G Bruce Mann; Tanjina Kader; Simone M Rowley; Stephen B Fox; David Byrne; Hugo Saunders; Kenji M Fujihara; Belle Lim
Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-08-07

3.  A Longitudinal Study of the Association between Mammographic Density and Gene Expression in Normal Breast Tissue.

Authors:  Helga Bergholtz; Tonje Gulbrandsen Lien; Giske Ursin; Marit Muri Holmen; Åslaug Helland; Therese Sørlie; Vilde Drageset Haakensen
Journal:  J Mammary Gland Biol Neoplasia       Date:  2019-01-06       Impact factor: 2.673

4.  DNA damage drives an activin a-dependent induction of cyclooxygenase-2 in premalignant cells and lesions.

Authors:  Colleen Fordyce; Tim Fessenden; Curtis Pickering; Jason Jung; Veena Singla; Hal Berman; Thea Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Prev Res (Phila)       Date:  2009-12-22

Review 5.  Stromal biomarkers in breast cancer development and progression.

Authors:  Jenny A Rudnick; Charlotte Kuperwasser
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2012-06-10       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  Mammographic density as a predictor of breast cancer outcome.

Authors:  Gertraud Maskarinec; Christy G Woolcott; Laurence N Kolonel
Journal:  Future Oncol       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.404

7.  JNK1 stress signaling is hyper-activated in high breast density and the tumor stroma: connecting fibrosis, inflammation, and stemness for cancer prevention.

Authors:  Michael P Lisanti; Aristotelis Tsirigos; Stephanos Pavlides; Kimberley Jayne Reeves; Maria Peiris-Pagès; Amy L Chadwick; Rosa Sanchez-Alvarez; Rebecca Lamb; Anthony Howell; Ubaldo E Martinez-Outschoorn; Federica Sotgia
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  Expression levels of uridine 5'-diphospho-glucuronosyltransferase genes in breast tissue from healthy women are associated with mammographic density.

Authors:  Vilde D Haakensen; Margarethe Biong; Ole Christian Lingjærde; Marit Muri Holmen; Jan Ole Frantzen; Ying Chen; Dina Navjord; Linda Romundstad; Torben Lüders; Ida K Bukholm; Hiroko K Solvang; Vessela N Kristensen; Giske Ursin; Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale; Aslaug Helland
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 6.466

9.  Genetic variation in transforming growth factor beta 1 and mammographic density in Singapore Chinese women.

Authors:  Eunjung Lee; David Van Den Berg; Chris Hsu; Giske Ursin; Woon-Puay Koh; Jian-Min Yuan; Daniel O Stram; Mimi C Yu; Anna H Wu
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2013-01-18       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Relationship of mammographic density and gene expression: analysis of normal breast tissue surrounding breast cancer.

Authors:  Xuezheng Sun; Gretchen L Gierach; Rupninder Sandhu; Tyisha Williams; Bentley R Midkiff; Jolanta Lissowska; Ewa Wesolowska; Norman F Boyd; Nicole B Johnson; Jonine D Figueroa; Mark E Sherman; Melissa A Troester
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2013-08-05       Impact factor: 12.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.