Literature DB >> 33574272

The TP53 mutation rate differs in breast cancers that arise in women with high or low mammographic density.

Kylie L Gorringe1,2, Ian G Campbell3,1, Dane Cheasley4,5, Lisa Devereux3,1,6, Siobhan Hughes3, Carolyn Nickson7,8,9, Pietro Procopio7,8,9, Grant Lee7, Na Li3, Vicki Pridmore10, Kenneth Elder11,12,13, G Bruce Mann1,11,12, Tanjina Kader3,1, Simone M Rowley3, Stephen B Fox14, David Byrne14, Hugo Saunders3, Kenji M Fujihara3, Belle Lim3,15.   

Abstract

Mammographic density (MD) influences breast cancer risk, but how this is mediated is unknown. Molecular differences between breast cancers arising in the context of the lowest and highest quintiles of mammographic density may identify the mechanism through which MD drives breast cancer development. Women diagnosed with invasive or in situ breast cancer where MD measurement was also available (n = 842) were identified from the Lifepool cohort of >54,000 women participating in population-based mammographic screening. This group included 142 carcinomas in the lowest quintile of MD and 119 carcinomas in the highest quintile. Clinico-pathological and family history information were recorded. Tumor DNA was collected where available (n = 56) and sequenced for breast cancer predisposition and driver gene mutations, including copy number alterations. Compared to carcinomas from low-MD breasts, those from high-MD breasts were significantly associated with a younger age at diagnosis and features associated with poor prognosis. Low- and high-MD carcinomas matched for grade, histological subtype, and hormone receptor status were compared for somatic genetic features. Low-MD carcinomas had a significantly increased frequency of TP53 mutations, higher homologous recombination deficiency, higher fraction of the genome altered, and more copy number gains on chromosome 1q and losses on 17p. While high-MD carcinomas showed enrichment of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in the stroma. The data demonstrate that when tumors were matched for confounding clinico-pathological features, a proportion in the lowest quintile of MD appear biologically distinct, reflective of microenvironment differences between the lowest and highest quintiles of MD.

Year:  2020        PMID: 33574272     DOI: 10.1038/s41523-020-00176-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  NPJ Breast Cancer        ISSN: 2374-4677


  37 in total

1.  CD36 repression activates a multicellular stromal program shared by high mammographic density and tumor tissues.

Authors:  Rosa Anna DeFilippis; Hang Chang; Nancy Dumont; Joseph T Rabban; Yunn-Yi Chen; Gerald V Fontenay; Hal K Berman; Mona L Gauthier; Jianxin Zhao; Donglei Hu; James J Marx; Judy A Tjoe; Elad Ziv; Maria Febbraio; Karla Kerlikowske; Bahram Parvin; Thea D Tlsty
Journal:  Cancer Discov       Date:  2012-07-09       Impact factor: 39.397

Review 2.  Insights into the key roles of proteoglycans in breast cancer biology and translational medicine.

Authors:  Achilleas D Theocharis; Spyros S Skandalis; Thomas Neill; Hinke A B Multhaupt; Mario Hubo; Helena Frey; Sandeep Gopal; Angélica Gomes; Nikos Afratis; Hooi Ching Lim; John R Couchman; Jorge Filmus; Ralph D Sanderson; Liliana Schaefer; Renato V Iozzo; Nikos K Karamanos
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2015-03-28

3.  Heritability of mammographic density, a risk factor for breast cancer.

Authors:  Norman F Boyd; Gillian S Dite; Jennifer Stone; Anoma Gunasekara; Dallas R English; Margaret R E McCredie; Graham G Giles; David Tritchler; Anna Chiarelli; Martin J Yaffe; John L Hopper
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-09-19       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  Tumour size at detection according to different measures of mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Carolyn Nickson; Anne M Kavanagh
Journal:  J Med Screen       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.136

5.  Decreased TGFbeta signaling and increased COX2 expression in high risk women with increased mammographic breast density.

Authors:  Wei Tse Yang; Michael T Lewis; Kenneth Hess; Helen Wong; Anna Tsimelzon; Nese Karadag; Michelina Cairo; Caimaio Wei; Funda Meric-Bernstam; Powel Brown; Banu Arun; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Aysegul Sahin; Jenny C Chang
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2009-02-25       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Common variants in ZNF365 are associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sara Lindström; Celine M Vachon; Jingmei Li; Jajini Varghese; Deborah Thompson; Ruth Warren; Judith Brown; Jean Leyland; Tina Audley; Nicholas J Wareham; Ruth J F Loos; Andrew D Paterson; Johanna Rommens; Darryl Waggott; Lisa J Martin; Christopher G Scott; V Shane Pankratz; Susan E Hankinson; Aditi Hazra; David J Hunter; John L Hopper; Melissa C Southey; Stephen J Chanock; Isabel dos Santos Silva; JianJun Liu; Louise Eriksson; Fergus J Couch; Jennifer Stone; Carmel Apicella; Kamila Czene; Peter Kraft; Per Hall; Douglas F Easton; Norman F Boyd; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2011-01-30       Impact factor: 38.330

7.  Genome-wide association study identifies multiple loci associated with both mammographic density and breast cancer risk.

Authors:  Sara Lindström; Deborah J Thompson; Andrew D Paterson; Jingmei Li; Gretchen L Gierach; Christopher Scott; Jennifer Stone; Julie A Douglas; Isabel dos-Santos-Silva; Pablo Fernandez-Navarro; Jajini Verghase; Paula Smith; Judith Brown; Robert Luben; Nicholas J Wareham; Ruth J F Loos; John A Heit; V Shane Pankratz; Aaron Norman; Ellen L Goode; Julie M Cunningham; Mariza deAndrade; Robert A Vierkant; Kamila Czene; Peter A Fasching; Laura Baglietto; Melissa C Southey; Graham G Giles; Kaanan P Shah; Heang-Ping Chan; Mark A Helvie; Andrew H Beck; Nicholas W Knoblauch; Aditi Hazra; David J Hunter; Peter Kraft; Marina Pollan; Jonine D Figueroa; Fergus J Couch; John L Hopper; Per Hall; Douglas F Easton; Norman F Boyd; Celine M Vachon; Rulla M Tamimi
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 14.919

8.  Associations between breast density and a panel of single nucleotide polymorphisms linked to breast cancer risk: a cohort study with digital mammography.

Authors:  Brad M Keller; Anne Marie McCarthy; Jinbo Chen; Katrina Armstrong; Emily F Conant; Susan M Domchek; Despina Kontos
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2015-03-18       Impact factor: 4.430

Review 9.  An overview of mammographic density and its association with breast cancer.

Authors:  Shayan Shaghayeq Nazari; Pinku Mukherjee
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2018-04-12       Impact factor: 4.239

10.  Mammographic density is related to stroma and stromal proteoglycan expression.

Authors:  Salem Alowami; Sandra Troup; Sahar Al-Haddad; Iain Kirkpatrick; Peter H Watson
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2003-07-23       Impact factor: 6.466

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.