Literature DB >> 19237337

Vision and task assistance using modular wireless in vivo surgical robots.

Stephen R Platt1, Jeff A Hawks, Mark E Rentschler.   

Abstract

Minimally invasive abdominal surgery (laparoscopy) results in superior patient outcomes compared to conventional open surgery. However, the difficulty of manipulating traditional laparoscopic tools from outside the body of the patient generally limits these benefits to patients undergoing relatively low complexity procedures. The use of tools that fit entirely inside the peritoneal cavity represents a novel approach to laparoscopic surgery. Our previous work demonstrated that miniature mobile and fixed-based in vivo robots using tethers for power and data transmission can successfully operate within the abdominal cavity. This paper describes the development of a modular wireless mobile platform for in vivo sensing and manipulation applications. Design details and results of ex vivo and in vivo tests of robots with biopsy grasper, staple/clamp, video, and physiological sensor payloads are presented. These types of self-contained surgical devices are significantly more transportable and lower in cost than current robotic surgical assistants. They could ultimately be carried and deployed by nonmedical personnel at the site of an injury to allow a remotely located surgeon to provide critical first response medical intervention irrespective of the location of the patient.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19237337      PMCID: PMC2697282          DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2009.2014741

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0018-9294            Impact factor:   4.538


  23 in total

1.  The development of the swallowable video capsule (M2A).

Authors:  G D Meron
Journal:  Gastrointest Endosc       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 9.427

2.  Robotic assistants aid surgeons during minimally invasive procedures.

Authors:  H Kang; J T Wen
Journal:  IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag       Date:  2001 Jan-Feb

3.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

4.  In vivo robots for laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Mark E Rentschler; Adnan Hadzialic; Jason Dumpert; Stephen R Platt; Shane Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

5.  In-vivo stereoscopic imaging system with 5 degrees-of-freedom for minimal access surgery.

Authors:  Andrew Miller; Peter Allen; Dennis Fowler
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2004

6.  Preliminary evaluation of a mobile robotic device for navigation and intervention on the beating heart.

Authors:  N A Patronik; M A Zenati; C N Riviere
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2005-07

7.  Locomotion of a legged capsule in the gastrointestinal tract: theoretical study and preliminary technological results.

Authors:  A Menciassi; C Stefanini; S Gorini; G Pernorio; B Kim; J O Park; P Dario
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2004

Review 8.  The development and application of wireless capsule endoscopy.

Authors:  A Glukhovsky; H Jacob
Journal:  Int J Med Robot       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.547

9.  In vivo pan/tilt endoscope with integrated light source, zoom and auto-focusing.

Authors:  Tie Hu; Peter K Allen; Roger Goldman; Nancy J Hogle; Dennis L Fowler
Journal:  Stud Health Technol Inform       Date:  2008

10.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  9 in total

1.  Dexterous miniature robot for advanced minimally invasive surgery.

Authors:  Amy C Lehman; Nathan A Wood; Shane Farritor; Matthew R Goede; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-12       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Robotic colorectal surgery: current status and future developments].

Authors:  D Jayne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Steering and control of miniaturized untethered soft magnetic grippers with haptic assistance.

Authors:  C Pacchierotti; F Ongaro; F van den Brink; C Yoon; D Prattichizzo; D H Gracias; S Misra
Journal:  IEEE Trans Autom Sci Eng       Date:  2017-01-17       Impact factor: 5.083

4.  Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Authors:  Oleg Dolghi; Kyle W Strabala; Tyler D Wortman; Matthew R Goede; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-04-13       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  s-CAM: An Untethered Insertable Laparoscopic Surgical Camera Robot with Non-Contact Actuation.

Authors:  Ning Li; Hui Liu; Reza Yazdanpanah Abdolmalaki; Gregory J Mancini; Jindong Tan
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-29       Impact factor: 3.847

6.  Biopsy with thermally-responsive untethered microtools.

Authors:  Evin Gultepe; Jatinder S Randhawa; Sachin Kadam; Sumitaka Yamanaka; Florin M Selaru; Eun J Shin; Anthony N Kalloo; David H Gracias
Journal:  Adv Mater       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 30.849

7.  Wireless insufflation of the gastrointestinal tract.

Authors:  Jenna L Gorlewicz; Santina Battaglia; Byron F Smith; Gastone Ciuti; Jason Gerding; Arianna Menciassi; Keith L Obstein; Pietro Valdastri; Robert J Webster
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2012-11-29       Impact factor: 4.538

8.  Design of a Magnetically Anchored Laparoscope Using Miniature Ultrasonic Motors.

Authors:  Jingwu Li; Zhijun Sun; He Yan; Jinyan Chen
Journal:  Micromachines (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-30       Impact factor: 3.523

9.  Engineering Micromechanical Systems for the Next Generation Wireless Capsule Endoscopy.

Authors:  Stephen Woods; Timothy Constandinou
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-07-15       Impact factor: 3.411

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.