Literature DB >> 21487861

Miniature in vivo robot for laparoendoscopic single-site surgery.

Oleg Dolghi1, Kyle W Strabala, Tyler D Wortman, Matthew R Goede, Shane M Farritor, Dmitry Oleynikov.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to develop a multidexterous robot capable of generating the required forces and speeds to perform surgical tasks intra-abdominally. Current laparoscopic surgical robots are expensive, bulky, and fundamentally constrained by a small entry incision. A new approach to minimally invasive surgery places the robot completely within the patient. Miniature in vivo robots may allow surgeons to overcome current laparoscopic constraints such as dexterity, orientation, and visualization.
METHODS: A collaborative research group from the Department of Surgery at the University of Nebraska Medical Center and the College of Engineering at the University of Nebraska-Lincoln designed and built a surgical robot prototype capable of performing specific surgical tasks within the peritoneal cavity.
RESULTS: The basic robotic design consists of two arms each connected to a central body. Each arm has three degrees of freedom and rotational shoulder and elbow joints. This combination allows a surgeon to grasp, manipulate, cauterize, and perform intracorporeal suturing. The robot's workspace is a hollow hemisphere with an inner radius of 75 mm and an outer radius of 205 mm. Its versatility was demonstrated in four procedures performed in a porcine model: cholecystectomy, partial colectomy, abdominal exploration, and intracorporeal suturing.
CONCLUSIONS: Miniature in vivo robots have the potential to address the limitations of using articulated instrumentation to perform advanced laparoscopic surgical procedures. Once inserted into the peritoneal cavity, the robot provides a stable platform for visualization with sufficient dexterity and speed to perform surgical tasks from multiple orientations and workspaces.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21487861     DOI: 10.1007/s00464-011-1687-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Surg Endosc        ISSN: 0930-2794            Impact factor:   4.584


  21 in total

1.  Dexterity enhancement with robotic surgery.

Authors:  K Moorthy; Y Munz; A Dosis; J Hernandez; S Martin; F Bello; T Rockall; A Darzi
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-06       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Surgery with cooperative robots.

Authors:  Amy C Lehman; Kyle A Berg; Jason Dumpert; Nathan A Wood; Abigail Q Visty; Mark E Rentschler; Stephen R Platt; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Comput Aided Surg       Date:  2008-03

3.  Natural orifice cholecystectomy using a miniature robot.

Authors:  Amy C Lehman; Jason Dumpert; Nathan A Wood; Lee Redden; Abigail Q Visty; Shane Farritor; Brandon Varnell; Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-12-05       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 4.  The future of NOTES instrumentation: Flexible robotics and in vivo minirobots.

Authors:  David Canes; Amy C Lehman; Shane M Farritor; Dmitry Oleynikov; Mihir M Desai
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.942

Review 5.  Robotic surgery.

Authors:  Dmitry Oleynikov
Journal:  Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-10       Impact factor: 2.741

6.  Single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy: surgery without a visible scar.

Authors:  R Tacchino; F Greco; D Matera
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-09-25       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Comparison of conventional anterior surgery and laparoscopic surgery for inguinal-hernia repair.

Authors:  M S Liem; Y van der Graaf; C J van Steensel; R U Boelhouwer; G J Clevers; W S Meijer; L P Stassen; J P Vente; W F Weidema; A J Schrijvers; T J van Vroonhoven
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-29       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Vision and task assistance using modular wireless in vivo surgical robots.

Authors:  Stephen R Platt; Jeff A Hawks; Mark E Rentschler
Journal:  IEEE Trans Biomed Eng       Date:  2009-02-20       Impact factor: 4.538

9.  Scarless cholecystectomy with combined transvaginal and transumbilical approach in a series of 20 patients.

Authors:  C Zornig; H Mofid; A Emmermann; M Alm; H-A von Waldenfels; C Felixmüller
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-04-09       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Advantages and limits of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery: preliminary experience.

Authors:  F Corcione; C Esposito; D Cuccurullo; A Settembre; N Miranda; F Amato; F Pirozzi; P Caiazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-18       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  [Robotic colorectal surgery: current status and future developments].

Authors:  D Jayne
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 2.  A state of the art review and categorization of multi-branched instruments for NOTES and SILS.

Authors:  Ewout A Arkenbout; Paul W J Henselmans; Filip Jelínek; Paul Breedveld
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-09-24       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Current Status of Single-Site Robotic Cholecystectomy, its feasibility, economic and overall impact.

Authors:  Dinesh Vyas; Cara Weiner; Arpita K Vyas
Journal:  Am J Robot Surg       Date:  2014-06-01

Review 4.  30 Years of Robotic Surgery.

Authors:  Tiago Leal Ghezzi; Oly Campos Corleta
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.352

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.