Literature DB >> 19236923

Automated segmentation of mouse brain images using extended MRF.

Min Hyeok Bae1, Rong Pan, Teresa Wu, Alexandra Badea.   

Abstract

We introduce an automated segmentation method, extended Markov random field (eMRF), to classify 21 neuroanatomical structures of mouse brain based on three dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance images (MRI). The image data are multispectral: T2-weighted, proton density-weighted, diffusion x, y and z weighted. Earlier research (Ali, A.A., Dale, A.M., Badea, A., Johnson, G.A., 2005. Automated segmentation of neuroanatomical structures in multispectral MR microscopy of the mouse brain. NeuroImage 27 (2), 425-435) successfully explored the use of MRF for mouse brain segmentation. In this research, we study the use of information generated from support vector machine (SVM) to represent the probabilistic information. Since SVM in general has a stronger discriminative power than the Gaussian likelihood method and is able to handle nonlinear classification problems, integrating SVM into MRF improved the classification accuracy. The eMRF employs the posterior probability distribution obtained from SVM to generate a classification based on the MR intensity. Secondly, the eMRF introduces a new potential function based on location information. Third, to maximize the classification performance, the eMRF uses the contribution weights optimally determined for each of the three potential functions: observation, location and contextual functions, which are traditionally equally weighted. We use the voxel overlap percentage and volume difference percentage to evaluate the accuracy of eMRF segmentation and compare the algorithm with three other segmentation methods--mixed ratio sampling SVM (MRS-SVM), atlas-based segmentation and MRF. Validation using classification accuracy indices between automatically segmented and manually traced data shows that eMRF outperforms other methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19236923      PMCID: PMC2748869          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.02.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  20 in total

1.  Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain.

Authors:  Bruce Fischl; David H Salat; Evelina Busa; Marilyn Albert; Megan Dieterich; Christian Haselgrove; Andre van der Kouwe; Ron Killiany; David Kennedy; Shuna Klaveness; Albert Montillo; Nikos Makris; Bruce Rosen; Anders M Dale
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 17.173

2.  A robust method for extraction and automatic segmentation of brain images.

Authors:  N Kovacevic; N J Lobaugh; M J Bronskill; B Levine; A Feinstein; S E Black
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-11       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  Segmentation of magnetic resonance brain images through discriminant analysis.

Authors:  Umberto Amato; Michele Larobina; Anestis Antoniadis; Bruno Alfano
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2003-12-30       Impact factor: 2.390

4.  Automated segmentation of multispectral brain MR images.

Authors:  Anders H Andersen; Zhiming Zhang; Malcolm J Avison; Don M Gash
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2002-12-31       Impact factor: 2.390

5.  Segmentation and interpretation of MR brain images: an improved active shape model.

Authors:  N Duta; M Sonka
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 10.048

6.  Multimodal image coregistration and partitioning--a unified framework.

Authors:  J Ashburner; K Friston
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Automated segmentation and classification of multispectral magnetic resonance images of brain using artificial neural networks.

Authors:  W E Reddick; J O Glass; E N Cook; T D Elkin; R J Deaton
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  In vivo magnetic resonance imaging and semiautomated image analysis extend the brain phenotype for cdf/cdf mice.

Authors:  Nicholas A Bock; Natasa Kovacevic; Tatiana V Lipina; John C Roder; Susan L Ackerman; R Mark Henkelman
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-04-26       Impact factor: 6.167

9.  A three-dimensional digital atlas database of the adult C57BL/6J mouse brain by magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Y Ma; P R Hof; S C Grant; S J Blackband; R Bennett; L Slatest; M D McGuigan; H Benveniste
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2005-09-13       Impact factor: 3.590

10.  Automatic anatomical brain MRI segmentation combining label propagation and decision fusion.

Authors:  Rolf A Heckemann; Joseph V Hajnal; Paul Aljabar; Daniel Rueckert; Alexander Hammers
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2006-07-24       Impact factor: 6.556

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  3-dimensional imaging modalities for phenotyping genetically engineered mice.

Authors:  K A Powell; D Wilson
Journal:  Vet Pathol       Date:  2011-12-06       Impact factor: 2.221

2.  Performing label-fusion-based segmentation using multiple automatically generated templates.

Authors:  M Mallar Chakravarty; Patrick Steadman; Matthijs C van Eede; Rebecca D Calcott; Victoria Gu; Philip Shaw; Armin Raznahan; D Louis Collins; Jason P Lerch
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  An End-to-end System for Automatic Characterization of Iba1 Immunopositive Microglia in Whole Slide Imaging.

Authors:  Alexander D Kyriazis; Shahriar Noroozizadeh; Amir Refaee; Woongcheol Choi; Lap-Tak Chu; Asma Bashir; Wai Hang Cheng; Rachel Zhao; Dhananjay R Namjoshi; Septimiu E Salcudean; Cheryl L Wellington; Guy Nir
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2019-07

4.  A prior feature SVM-MRF based method for mouse brain segmentation.

Authors:  Teresa Wu; Min Hyeok Bae; Min Zhang; Rong Pan; Alexandra Badea
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2011-10-01       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Automated segmentation of mouse brain images using multi-atlas multi-ROI deformation and label fusion.

Authors:  Jingxin Nie; Dinggang Shen
Journal:  Neuroinformatics       Date:  2013-01

6.  Deep learning facilitates fully automated brain image registration of optoacoustic tomography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Yexing Hu; Berkan Lafci; Artur Luzgin; Hao Wang; Jan Klohs; Xose Luis Dean-Ben; Ruiqing Ni; Daniel Razansky; Wuwei Ren
Journal:  Biomed Opt Express       Date:  2022-08-18       Impact factor: 3.562

7.  Longitudinal characterization of brain atrophy of a Huntington's disease mouse model by automated morphological analyses of magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  Jiangyang Zhang; Qi Peng; Qing Li; Neda Jahanshad; Zhipeng Hou; Mali Jiang; Naoki Masuda; Douglas R Langbehn; Michael I Miller; Susumu Mori; Christopher A Ross; Wenzhen Duan
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2009-10-19       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 8.  Genetic dissection of the mouse CNS using magnetic resonance microscopy.

Authors:  Alexandra Badea; G Allan Johnson; Robert W Williams
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurol       Date:  2009-08       Impact factor: 5.710

9.  Automatic classification framework for ventricular septal defects: a pilot study on high-throughput mouse embryo cardiac phenotyping.

Authors:  Zhongliu Xie; Xi Liang; Liucheng Guo; Asanobu Kitamoto; Masaru Tamura; Toshihiko Shiroishi; Duncan Gillies
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-09-11

10.  An automatic segmentation and classification framework for anti-nuclear antibody images.

Authors:  Chung-Chuan Cheng; Tsu-Yi Hsieh; Jin-Shiuh Taur; Yung-Fu Chen
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2013-12-09       Impact factor: 2.819

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.