Literature DB >> 19224219

Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Nariya Cho1, Woo Kyung Moon, Jeong-Seon Park.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the use of US elastography in the differentiation of mammographically detected suspicious microcalcifications, using histology as the reference standard. Between May 2006 and April 2007, real-time US elasticity images were obtained in 77 patients (age range, 24-67 years; mean, 46 years) with 77 mammographically detected areas of microcalcifications (42 benign and 35 malignant lesions) prior to needle biopsy. Two experienced radiologists reviewed cine clips of elasticity and B-mode images and assigned an elasticity score of 1 to 3 in consensus, based on the degree of strain in the hypoechoic lesion without information of mammography and histology. For the elasticity score, the mean +/- standard deviation was 1.5 +/- 0.7 for benign and 2.7 +/- 0.7 for malignant lesions (P < 0.001). When a cutoff point between elasticity scores of 1 and 2 was used, US elastography showed 97% (34/35) sensitivity, 62% (26/42) specificity, 68% (34/50) PPV, and 96% (26/27) NPV with an Az value of 0.852 (0.753-0.923, 95% confidence interval) in the differentiation of benign and malignant microcalcifications. Our results suggest that US elastography has the potential to differentiate benign and malignant lesions associated with microcalcifications detected at screening mammography.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19224219     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1335-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  20 in total

1.  US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.

Authors:  W K Moon; J G Im; Y H Koh; D Y Noh; I A Park
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

3.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Current improvements in breast ultrasound, with a special focus on elastography.

Authors:  Eriko Tohno; Ei Ueno
Journal:  Breast Cancer       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 4.239

7.  Sonographically guided biopsy of suspicious microcalcifications of the breast: a pilot study.

Authors:  Mary Scott Soo; Jay A Baker; Eric L Rosen; Thuy T Vo
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.959

8.  Intramammary calcifications without an associated mass in benign and malignant diseases.

Authors:  R L Egan; M B McSweeney; C W Sewell
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1980-10       Impact factor: 11.105

9.  Stereotactic vacuum-assisted breast biopsies in 500 women with microcalcifications: radiological and pathological correlations.

Authors:  Ute Kettritz; Günter Morack; Thomas Decker
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-12-13       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study.

Authors:  Rebecca C Booi; Paul L Carson; Matthew O'Donnell; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Anne L Hall; Jonathan M Rubin
Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.998

View more
  9 in total

1.  Characterisation of indeterminate focal breast lesions on grey-scale ultrasound: role of ultrasound elastography.

Authors:  T V Bartolotta; R Ienzi; A Cirino; C Genova; F Ienzi; D Pitarresi; E Safina; M Midiri
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2011-03-07       Impact factor: 3.469

2.  Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong-Seon Park; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  [Elastography as an additional tool in breast sonography. Technical principles and clinical applications].

Authors:  D Rjosk-Dendorfer; A Reichelt; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

4.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Assessment of breast cancer tumour size using six different methods.

Authors:  Martina Meier-Meitinger; Lothar Häberle; Peter A Fasching; Mayada R Bani; Katharina Heusinger; David Wachter; Matthias W Beckmann; Michael Uder; Rüdiger Schulz-Wendtland; Boris Adamietz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2010-12-30       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Shear-wave elastography in the diagnosis of solid breast masses: what leads to false-negative or false-positive results?

Authors:  Jung Hyun Yoon; Hae Kyoung Jung; Jong Tae Lee; Kyung Hee Ko
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-05-15       Impact factor: 5.315

7.  Association of tumour stiffness on sonoelastography with axillary nodal status in T1 breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Woo Kyung Moon; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Seung Ja Kim; Wonshik Han; In-Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

8.  Factors influencing breast elasticity measured by the ultrasound Shear Wave elastography - preliminary results.

Authors:  Paweł Rzymski; Agnieszka Skórzewska; Myriam Skibińska-Zielińska; Tomasz Opala
Journal:  Arch Med Sci       Date:  2011-03-08       Impact factor: 3.318

9.  Combined use of the automated breast volume scanner and the US elastography for the differentiation of benign from malignant lesions of the breast.

Authors:  Chaoli Xu; Shuping Wei; Yingdong Xie; Xiaoxiang Guan; Ninghua Fu; Pengfei Huang; Bin Yang
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-11-03       Impact factor: 4.430

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.