Literature DB >> 17900795

Characterization of cysts using differential correlation coefficient values from two dimensional breast elastography: preliminary study.

Rebecca C Booi1, Paul L Carson, Matthew O'Donnell, Marilyn A Roubidoux, Anne L Hall, Jonathan M Rubin.   

Abstract

Although simple cysts are easily identified using sonography, description and management of nonsimple cysts remains uncertain. This study evaluated whether the correlation coefficient differences between breast tissue and lesions, obtained from 2D breast elastography, could potentially distinguish nonsimple cysts from cancers and fibroadenomas. We hypothesized that correlation coefficients in cysts would be dramatically lower than surrounding tissue because noise, imaging artifacts, and particulate matter move randomly and decorrelate quickly under compression, compared with solid tissue. For this preliminary study, 18 breast lesions (7 nonsimple cysts, 4 cancers, and 7 fibroadenomas) underwent imaging with 2D elastography at 7.5 MHz through a TPX (a polymethyl pentene copolymer) 2.5 mm mammographic paddle. Breasts were compressed similar to mammographic positioning and then further compressed for elastography by 1 to 7%. Images were correlated using 2D phase-sensitive speckle tracking algorithms and displacement estimates were accumulated. Correlation coefficient means and standard deviations were measured in the lesion and adjacent tissue, and the differential correlation coefficient (DCC) was introduced as the difference between these values normalized to the correlation coefficient of adjacent tissue. Mean DCC values in nonsimple cysts were 24.2 +/- 11.6%, 5.7 +/- 6.3% for fibroadenomas, and 3.8 +/- 2.9 % for cancers (p < 0.05). Some of the cysts appeared smaller in DCC images than gray-scale images. These encouraging results demonstrate that characterization of nonsimple breast cysts may be improved by using DCC values from 2D elastography, which could potentially change management options of these cysts from intervention to imaging follow-up. A dedicated clinical trial to fully assess the efficacy of this technique is recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2007        PMID: 17900795      PMCID: PMC2330278          DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2007.07.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ultrasound Med Biol        ISSN: 0301-5629            Impact factor:   2.998


  23 in total

1.  Strain rate imaging using two-dimensional speckle tracking.

Authors:  K Kaluzynski; X Chen; S Y Emelianov; A R Skovoroda; M O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.725

2.  Combination of digital mammography with semi-automated 3D breast ultrasound.

Authors:  Ajay Kapur; Paul L Carson; Jeffrey Eberhard; Mitchell M Goodsitt; Kai Thomenius; Murtuza Lokhandwalla; Donald Buckley; Marilyn A Roubidoux; Mark A Helvie; Rebecca C Booi; Gerald L LeCarpentier; Ramon Q Erkamp; Heang-Ping Chan; J Brian Fowlkes; Jerry A Thomas; Cynthia E Landberg
Journal:  Technol Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-08

3.  Speckle tracking methods for ultrasonic elasticity imaging using short-time correlation.

Authors:  M A Lubinski; S Y Emelianov; M O'Donnell
Journal:  IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.725

Review 4.  NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology: breast cancer screening and diagnosis.

Authors:  Therese B Bevers; Benjamin O Anderson; Ermelinda Bonaccio; Saundra Buys; Sandra Buys; Mary B Daly; Peter J Dempsey; William B Farrar; Irving Fleming; Judy E Garber; Randall E Harris; Alexandra S Heerdt; Mark Helvie; John G Huff; Nazanin Khakpour; Seema A Khan; Helen Krontiras; Gary Lyman; Elizabeth Rafferty; Sara Shaw; Mary Lou Smith; Theodore N Tsangaris; Cheryl Williams; Thomas Yankeelov; Thomas Yaneeklov
Journal:  J Natl Compr Canc Netw       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 11.908

5.  Real-time breast sonography: application in 300 consecutive patients.

Authors:  S V Hilton; G R Leopold; L K Olson; S A Willson
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-09       Impact factor: 3.959

6.  Solid breast nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions.

Authors:  A T Stavros; D Thickman; C L Rapp; M A Dennis; S H Parker; G A Sisney
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Sonographic elasticity imaging of acute and chronic deep venous thrombosis in humans.

Authors:  Jonathan M Rubin; Hua Xie; Kang Kim; William F Weitzel; Stanislav Y Emelianov; Salavat R Aglyamov; Thomas W Wakefield; Andrew G Urquhart; Matthew O'Donnell
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 2.153

8.  Incidental findings on sonography of the breast: clinical significance and diagnostic workup.

Authors:  W Buchberger; P DeKoekkoek-Doll; P Springer; P Obrist; M Dünser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 3.959

9.  Benign breast lesions: ultrasound detection and diagnosis.

Authors:  E A Sickles; R A Filly; P W Callen
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1984-05       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  Using sonography to screen women with mammographically dense breasts.

Authors:  Pavel Crystal; Selwyn D Strano; Semyon Shcharynski; Michael J Koretz
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  9 in total

1.  AN OVERVIEW OF ELASTOGRAPHY - AN EMERGING BRANCH OF MEDICAL IMAGING.

Authors:  Armen Sarvazyan; Timothy J Hall; Matthew W Urban; Mostafa Fatemi; Salavat R Aglyamov; Brian S Garra
Journal:  Curr Med Imaging Rev       Date:  2011-11

2.  Role of sonoelastography in characterising breast nodules. Preliminary experience with 120 lesions.

Authors:  E Regini; S Bagnera; D Tota; P Campanino; A Luparia; F Barisone; M Durando; G Mariscotti; G Gandini
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 3.469

3.  Real-time US elastography in the differentiation of suspicious microcalcifications on mammography.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jeong-Seon Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-02-18       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  [Elastography as an additional tool in breast sonography. Technical principles and clinical applications].

Authors:  D Rjosk-Dendorfer; A Reichelt; D-A Clevert
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Cyst-like solid tumors of the musculoskeletal system: an analysis of ultrasound findings.

Authors:  Min Hee Lee; Na Ra Kim; Jeong Ah Ryu
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.199

6.  Combined screening with ultrasound and mammography vs mammography alone in women at elevated risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Wendie A Berg; Jeffrey D Blume; Jean B Cormack; Ellen B Mendelson; Daniel Lehrer; Marcela Böhm-Vélez; Etta D Pisano; Roberta A Jong; W Phil Evans; Marilyn J Morton; Mary C Mahoney; Linda Hovanessian Larsen; Richard G Barr; Dione M Farria; Helga S Marques; Karan Boparai
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2008-05-14       Impact factor: 56.272

7.  Sonoelastography in distinguishing benign from malignant complex breast mass and making the decision to biopsy.

Authors:  Mi Young Kim; Nariya Cho; Ann Yi; Hye Ryoung Koo; Bo La Yun; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2013-07-17       Impact factor: 3.500

8.  Virtual touch tissue imaging and quantification: value in malignancy prediction for complex cystic and solid breast lesions.

Authors:  Ying Zhang; Chong-Ke Zhao; Xiao-Long Li; Ya-Ping He; Wei-Wei Ren; Cai-Ping Zou; Yue-Wu Du; Hui-Xiong Xu
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Performance Study of a Torsional Wave Sensor and Cervical Tissue Characterization.

Authors:  Antonio Callejas; Antonio Gomez; Juan Melchor; Miguel Riveiro; Paloma Massó; Jorge Torres; Modesto T López-López; Guillermo Rus
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 3.576

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.