Literature DB >> 21400103

Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy.

Nariya Cho1, Woo Kyung Moon, Jung Min Chang, Ann Yi, Hye Ryoung Koo, Jeong-Seon Park, In Ae Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To retrospectively evaluate whether sonoelastographic evaluation could help predict the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy.
METHODS: One hundred and three consecutive nonpalpable DCIS lesions diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy were analyzed. To identify the preoperative factors associated with upgrade to invasive cancers on surgical histology, lesion size, B-mode US findings, elasticity score, biopsy variables, and histological variables were analyzed using univariate and multivariate logistic regression. Interobserver agreement for the elasticity score was evaluated using the multi-rater κ statistics.
RESULTS: The overall upgrade rate was 23% (24 of 103). Elasticity score was found to be the only independent predictor of invasion. The upgrade rates according to the median elasticity score was 6.7% (1 of 15) for a score of 1, 20.6% (13 of 63) for a score of 2, and 40.0% (10 of 25) for a score of 3 (Odds ratio [OR] = 1; OR = 4.19, P = 0.207; OR = 12.32, P = 0.039, respectively). No association was found between other factors and the upgrade rate. The overall interobserver agreement for the elasticity score was moderate (κ = 0.587; P < .001).
CONCLUSIONS: Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness is an independent preoperative predictor of invasion in some patients with nonpalpable DCIS at US-guided needle biopsy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21400103     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-011-2103-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  28 in total

1.  Elastic moduli of breast and prostate tissues under compression.

Authors:  T A Krouskop; T M Wheeler; F Kallel; B S Garra; T Hall
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 2.  Percutaneous image-guided core breast biopsy.

Authors:  Laura Liberman
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 2.303

3.  Breast lesions: evaluation with US strain imaging--clinical experience of multiple observers.

Authors:  Dawn M Regner; Gina K Hesley; Nicholas J Hangiandreou; Marilyn J Morton; Michelle R Nordland; Duane D Meixner; Timothy J Hall; Michael A Farrell; Jayawant N Mandrekar; W Scott Harmsen; J William Charboneau
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  Role of sentinel lymph node biopsy in high-risk ductal carcinoma in situ patients.

Authors:  Cathal J Moran; Malcolm R Kell; Fidelma L Flanagan; Maria Kennedy; Thomas F Gorey; Michael J Kerin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.565

5.  Elastography: a quantitative method for imaging the elasticity of biological tissues.

Authors:  J Ophir; I Céspedes; H Ponnekanti; Y Yazdi; X Li
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 1.578

6.  Sonographic elastography combined with conventional sonography: how much is it helpful for diagnostic performance?

Authors:  Yu-Mee Sohn; Min Jung Kim; Eun-Kyung Kim; Jin Young Kwak; Hee Jung Moon; Soo Jin Kim
Journal:  J Ultrasound Med       Date:  2009-04       Impact factor: 2.153

7.  Ductal carcinoma in situ diagnosed with stereotactic core needle biopsy: can invasion be predicted?

Authors:  C H Lee; D Carter; L E Philpotts; M E Couce; L J Horvath; R C Lange; I Tocino
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A mass on breast imaging predicts coexisting invasive carcinoma in patients with a core biopsy diagnosis of ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  T A King; G H Farr; G J Cederbom; D H Smetherman; J S Bolton; A J Stolier; G M Fuhrman
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 0.688

9.  Predictors of invasive disease in breast cancer when core biopsy demonstrates DCIS only.

Authors:  Mary F Dillon; Enda W McDermott; Cecily M Quinn; Ann O'Doherty; Niall O'Higgins; Arnold D K Hill
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  2006-06-01       Impact factor: 3.454

10.  Reading protocol for dynamic contrast-enhanced MR images of the breast: sensitivity and specificity analysis.

Authors:  Ruth M L Warren; Linda Pointon; Deborah Thompson; Rebecca Hoff; Fiona J Gilbert; Anwar Padhani; Doug Easton; Sunil R Lakhani; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  8 in total

1.  Sonoelastography for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Bo La Yun; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Shear wave elastography of tumour growth in a human breast cancer model with pathological correlation.

Authors:  Foucauld Chamming's; H Latorre-Ossa; M A Le Frère-Belda; V Fitoussi; T Quibel; F Assayag; E Marangoni; G Autret; D Balvay; L Pidial; J L Gennisson; M Tanter; C A Cuenod; O Clément; L S Fournier
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-04-04       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  Association of tumour stiffness on sonoelastography with axillary nodal status in T1 breast carcinoma patients.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Woo Kyung Moon; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Min Sun Bae; Seung Ja Kim; Wonshik Han; In-Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-06-20       Impact factor: 5.315

5.  Ultrasonic Elastography Research Based on a Multicenter Study: Adding Strain Ratio after 5-Point Scoring Evaluation or Not.

Authors:  Wen-Jie Mu; Wen-Jing Zhong; Ji-Yi Yao; Lu-Jing Li; Yu-Lan Peng; Yi Wang; Li-Sha Liu; Ying Xiao; Shou-Jun Liu; Chang-Jun Wu; Yu-Xin Jiang; Shyam Sundar Parajuly; Ping Xu; Yi Hao; Jing Li; Bao-Ming Luo; Hui Zhi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-10       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Comparison of strain and shear wave elastography for qualitative and quantitative assessment of breast masses in the same population.

Authors:  Hyo Jin Kim; Sun Mi Kim; Bohyoung Kim; Bo La Yun; Mijung Jang; Yousun Ko; Soo Hyun Lee; Heeyeong Jeong; Jung Min Chang; Nariya Cho
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-18       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Usefulness of ultrasound elastography in reducing the number of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System category 3 lesions on ultrasonography.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Jihe Lim; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Ultrasonography       Date:  2014-02-26

8.  Interobserver and intermethod variability in data interpretation of breast strain elastography in suspicious breast lesions

Authors:  Hale Turnaoğlu; Kemal Murat Haberal; Serdar Arslan; Meriç Yavuz Çolak; Funda Ulu Öztürk; Nihal Uslu
Journal:  Turk J Med Sci       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 0.973

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.