Literature DB >> 23783782

Association of tumour stiffness on sonoelastography with axillary nodal status in T1 breast carcinoma patients.

Ann Yi1, Woo Kyung Moon, Nariya Cho, Jung Min Chang, Min Sun Bae, Seung Ja Kim, Wonshik Han, In-Ae Park.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate whether tumour stiffness on sonoelastography is associated with axillary nodal metastasis in T1 breast carcinoma patients.
METHODS: Between May 2006 and December 2010, 200 consecutive women (mean age, 51.6; range, 27 - 81 years) who underwent B-mode ultrasound (US), sonoelastography, and curative surgery with axillary nodal evaluation for clinically node negative T1 breast carcinomas (mean invasive tumour size, 12.4; range, 3 - 20 mm at pathology) were identified. The association between the elasticity score of the tumour and histopathological axillary nodal status was evaluated using a logistic regression model after controlling for imaging and clinicopathological variables of the tumour.
RESULTS: The overall incidence of axillary nodal metastasis was 15.5 % (31 of 200). Axillary nodal metastasis was significantly more frequent in tumours with elasticity scores ≥4 than in tumours with elasticity scores <4 (21.7 % vs. 4.2 %; P < 0.001). At multivariate analysis, an elasticity score ≥4 [odds ratio (OR), 6.95; P = 0.004], US size >10 mm (OR, 5.98; P = 0.022), and lymphovascular invasion (OR, 10.68; P < 0.001) of tumours were independently associated with axillary nodal metastasis.
CONCLUSIONS: Tumour stiffness on sonoelastography is independently associated with axillary nodal metastasis in T1 breast carcinoma patients. KEY POINTS: • Prediction of axillary nodal status using imaging techniques is valuable. • High ultrasound elasticity scores of T1 tumours were associated with axillary metastasis • Node-positive T1 tumours frequently had elasticity scores 4 or 5. • Sonoelastography might render axillary surgery unnecessary in T1 breast carcinoma patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23783782     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-013-2930-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  26 in total

1.  Sonoelastography for 1,786 non-palpable breast masses: diagnostic value in the decision to biopsy.

Authors:  Ann Yi; Nariya Cho; Jung Min Chang; Hye Ryoung Koo; Bo La Yun; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-11-25       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Differentiating benign from malignant solid breast masses with US strain imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth S Burnside; Timothy J Hall; Amy M Sommer; Gina K Hesley; Gale A Sisney; William E Svensson; Jason P Fine; Jinfeng Jiang; Nicholas J Hangiandreou
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 11.105

3.  Sonoelastographic lesion stiffness: preoperative predictor of the presence of an invasive focus in nonpalpable DCIS diagnosed at US-guided needle biopsy.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Hye Ryoung Koo; Jeong-Seon Park; In Ae Park
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2011-03-13       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  An in vitro correlation of metastatic capacity, substrate rigidity, and ECM composition.

Authors:  Indrajyoti Indra; Karen A Beningo
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 4.429

5.  Sentinel lymphadenectomy in breast cancer.

Authors:  A E Giuliano; R C Jones; M Brennan; R Statman
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Sonographic characteristics of breast cancers detected by supplemental screening US: Comparison with breast cancers seen on screening mammography.

Authors:  Nariya Cho; Woo Kyung Moon; Jung Min Chang; Ann Yi; Hye Ryoung Koo; Boo-Kyung Han
Journal:  Acta Radiol       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 1.990

7.  Axillary lymph node dissection for T1a breast carcinoma. Is it indicated?

Authors:  M J Silverstein; E D Gierson; J R Waisman; G M Senofsky; W J Colburn; P Gamagami
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1994-02-01       Impact factor: 6.860

8.  Pathological prognostic factors in breast cancer. I. The value of histological grade in breast cancer: experience from a large study with long-term follow-up.

Authors:  C W Elston; I O Ellis
Journal:  Histopathology       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 5.087

9.  Doctor, what are my chances of having a positive sentinel node? A validated nomogram for risk estimation.

Authors:  José Luiz B Bevilacqua; Michael W Kattan; Jane V Fey; Hiram S Cody; Patrick I Borgen; Kimberly J Van Zee
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2007-07-30       Impact factor: 44.544

10.  Prognostic value of proliferation assay in the luminal, HER2-positive, and triple-negative biologic classes of breast cancer.

Authors:  Mohammed A Aleskandarany; Andrew R Green; Ahmed A Benhasouna; Fabricio F Barros; Keith Neal; Jorge S Reis-Filho; Ian O Ellis; Emad A Rakha
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res       Date:  2012-01-06       Impact factor: 6.466

View more
  7 in total

1.  Prediction of invasive breast cancer using shear-wave elastography in patients with biopsy-confirmed ductal carcinoma in situ.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Jung Min Chang; Su Hyun Lee; Sung Ui Shin; Woo Kyung Moon
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-04-16       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Elaboration and Validation of a Nomogram Based on Axillary Ultrasound and Tumor Clinicopathological Features to Predict Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients With Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Yubo Liu; Feng Ye; Yun Wang; Xueyi Zheng; Yini Huang; Jianhua Zhou
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 5.738

3.  Assessment of elasticity of colorectal cancer tissue, clinical utility, pathological and phenotypical relevance.

Authors:  Shingo Kawano; Motohiro Kojima; Yoichi Higuchi; Motokazu Sugimoto; Koji Ikeda; Naoki Sakuyama; Shinichiro Takahashi; Ryuichi Hayashi; Atsushi Ochiai; Norio Saito
Journal:  Cancer Sci       Date:  2015-08-20       Impact factor: 6.716

4.  A Risk Model based on Ultrasound, Ultrasound Elastography, and Histologic Parameters for Predicting Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Breast Invasive Ductal Carcinoma.

Authors:  Xiao-Long Li; Hui-Xiong Xu; Dan-Dan Li; Ya-Ping He; Wen-Wen Yue; Jun-Mei Xu; Bo-Ji Liu; Li-Ping Sun; Lin Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-08       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  A ultrasound-based radiomic approach to predict the nodal status in clinically negative breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Samantha Bove; Maria Colomba Comes; Annarita Fanizzi; Raffaella Massafra; Vito Lorusso; Cristian Cristofaro; Vittorio Didonna; Gianluca Gatta; Francesco Giotta; Daniele La Forgia; Agnese Latorre; Maria Irene Pastena; Nicole Petruzzellis; Domenico Pomarico; Lucia Rinaldi; Pasquale Tamborra; Alfredo Zito
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-05-12       Impact factor: 4.996

6.  Deep Learning Mechanism for Predicting the Axillary Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Primary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  N Ashokkumar; S Meera; P Anandan; Mantripragada Yaswanth Bhanu Murthy; K S Kalaivani; Tahani Awad Alahmadi; Sulaiman Ali Alharbi; S S Raghavan; S Arockia Jayadhas
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2022-08-10       Impact factor: 3.246

7.  TGF-β1: is it related to the stiffness of breast lesions and can it predict axillary lymph node metastasis?

Authors:  Meng Ke Zhang; Qiu Jing Shang; Shi Yu Li; Bo Wang; Gang Liu; Zhi Li Wang
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2021-05
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.