Literature DB >> 19223421

Comparison of 3 methods of automated internal carotid segmentation in human brain PET studies: application to the estimation of arterial input function.

Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara1, Renaud Maroy, Claude Comtat, Sebastien Jan, Véronique Gaura, Avner Bar-Hen, Maria-Joao Ribeiro, Régine Trébossen.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Quantitative brain (18)F-FDG PET studies often require the plasma time-activity curve (input function) for estimation of the cerebral metabolic rate of glucose (CMRglc). The gold standard for input function measurement is arterial blood sampling, which is invasive and time-consuming. Alternatively, input function can be estimated from dynamic images. This estimation often implies the use of manually placed regions of interest (ROIs) over cerebral vasculature, which is an operator-dependent and time-consuming task. The aim of our study was to compare 3 algorithms of image segmentation (local means analysis [LMA], soft-decision similar component analysis [SCA], and k-means) to automatically segment internal carotid arteries from dynamic (18)F-FDG brain studies.
METHODS: The accuracy of automatic carotid segmentation algorithms was first tested using numeric phantoms of the human brain, by quantitatively assessing the overlap between the segmented carotids and the reference regions in the phantom. Then, the algorithm that yielded the best results was applied to data from 4 healthy volunteers, who underwent an (18)F-FDG dynamic 3-dimensional PET brain study. Concordance between manual and automatic ROIs, both uncorrected and after partial-volume effect and spillover correction, was first assessed. Linear regression was then used to compare manual versus automatic CMRglc values obtained using Patlak analysis. CMRglc values obtained by arterial sampling were used as a reference.
RESULTS: In phantom studies, LMA was shown to be superior to the other segmentation algorithms. By visual inspection, volunteers' internal carotids segmented by LMA were anatomically relevant. No significant difference was found between ROI values obtained by manual and automatic segmentation, either uncorrected or corrected for partial-volume effect. Linear regression demonstrated excellent agreement between the manual and automatic image-derived CMRglc values (P < 0.0001), and both correlated well with the reference values obtained by plasma samples.
CONCLUSION: The LMA segmentation algorithm allows accurate automatic delineation of internal carotids from dynamic PET brain studies. After correction for partial-volume effect, the main application would be the estimation of an image-derived input function.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19223421     DOI: 10.2967/jnumed.108.059642

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Nucl Med        ISSN: 0161-5505            Impact factor:   10.057


  13 in total

1.  Minimally invasive input function for 2-18F-fluoro-A-85380 brain PET studies.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Renaud Maroy; Marie-Anne Peyronneau; Régine Trebossen; Michel Bottlaender
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2012-01-10       Impact factor: 9.236

2.  An open tool for input function estimation and quantification of dynamic PET FDG brain scans.

Authors:  Martín Bertrán; Natalia Martínez; Guillermo Carbajal; Alicia Fernández; Álvaro Gómez
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2015-10-29       Impact factor: 2.924

3.  Kinetic analysis in human brain of [11C](R)-rolipram, a positron emission tomographic radioligand to image phosphodiesterase 4: a retest study and use of an image-derived input function.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Sami S Zoghbi; Jeih-San Liow; Elise Luong; Ronald Boellaard; Robert L Gladding; Victor W Pike; Robert B Innis; Masahiro Fujita
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 4.  Image-derived input function for brain PET studies: many challenges and few opportunities.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Kewei Chen; Jeih-San Liow; Masahiro Fujita; Robert B Innis
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2011-08-03       Impact factor: 6.200

5.  Image-derived input function in dynamic human PET/CT: methodology and validation with 11C-acetate and 18F-fluorothioheptadecanoic acid in muscle and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose in brain.

Authors:  Etienne Croteau; Eric Lavallée; Sébastien M Labbe; Laurent Hubert; Fabien Pifferi; Jacques A Rousseau; Stephen C Cunnane; André C Carpentier; Roger Lecomte; François Bénard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-05-02       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Physical and organizational provision for installation, regulatory requirements and implementation of a simultaneous hybrid PET/MR-imaging system in an integrated research and clinical setting.

Authors:  Bernhard Sattler; Thies Jochimsen; Henryk Barthel; Kerstin Sommerfeld; Patrick Stumpp; Karl-Titus Hoffmann; Matthias Gutberlet; Arno Villringer; Thomas Kahn; Osama Sabri
Journal:  MAGMA       Date:  2012-10-09       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  A hybrid clustering method for ROI delineation in small-animal dynamic PET images: application to the automatic estimation of FDG input functions.

Authors:  Xiujuan Zheng; Guangjian Tian; Sung-Cheng Huang; Dagan Feng
Journal:  IEEE Trans Inf Technol Biomed       Date:  2010-10-14

8.  Cerebral blood flow with [15O]water PET studies using an image-derived input function and MR-defined carotid centerlines.

Authors:  Edward K Fung; Richard E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2013-02-27       Impact factor: 3.609

9.  Image-derived input function for human brain using high resolution PET imaging with [C](R)-rolipram and [C]PBR28.

Authors:  Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara; Jeih-San Liow; Masahiro Fujita; Elodie Dusch; Sami S Zoghbi; Elise Luong; Ronald Boellaard; Victor W Pike; Claude Comtat; Robert B Innis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-02-25       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Combining MRI with PET for partial volume correction improves image-derived input functions in mice.

Authors:  Eleanor Evans; Guido Buonincontri; David Izquierdo; Carmen Methner; Rob C Hawkes; Richard E Ansorge; Thomas Krieg; T Adrian Carpenter; Stephen J Sawiak
Journal:  IEEE Trans Nucl Sci       Date:  2015-06-01       Impact factor: 1.679

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.