Literature DB >> 23442733

Cerebral blood flow with [15O]water PET studies using an image-derived input function and MR-defined carotid centerlines.

Edward K Fung1, Richard E Carson.   

Abstract

Full quantitative analysis of brain PET data requires knowledge of the arterial input function into the brain. Such data are normally acquired by arterial sampling with corrections for delay and dispersion to account for the distant sampling site. Several attempts have been made to extract an image-derived input function (IDIF) directly from the internal carotid arteries that supply the brain and are often visible in brain PET images. We have devised a method of delineating the internal carotids in co-registered magnetic resonance (MR) images using the level-set method and applying the segmentations to PET images using a novel centerline approach. Centerlines of the segmented carotids were modeled as cubic splines and re-registered in PET images summed over the early portion of the scan. Using information from the anatomical center of the vessel should minimize partial volume and spillover effects. Centerline time-activity curves were taken as the mean of the values for points along the centerline interpolated from neighboring voxels. A scale factor correction was derived from calculation of cerebral blood flow (CBF) using gold standard arterial blood measurements. We have applied the method to human subject data from multiple injections of [(15)O]water on the HRRT. The method was assessed by calculating the area under the curve (AUC) of the IDIF and the CBF, and comparing these to values computed using the gold standard arterial input curve. The average ratio of IDIF to arterial AUC (apparent recovery coefficient: aRC) across 9 subjects with multiple (n = 69) injections was 0.49 ± 0.09 at 0-30 s post tracer arrival, 0.45 ± 0.09 at 30-60 s, and 0.46 ± 0.09 at 60-90 s. Gray and white matter CBF values were 61.4 ± 11.0 and 15.6 ± 3.0 mL/min/100 g tissue using sampled blood data. Using IDIF centerlines scaled by the average aRC over each subjects' injections, gray and white matter CBF values were 61.3 ± 13.5 and 15.5 ± 3.4 mL/min/100 g tissue. Using global average aRC values, the means were unchanged, and intersubject variability was noticeably reduced. This MR-based centerline method with local re-registration to [(15)O]water PET yields a consistent IDIF over multiple injections in the same subject, thus permitting the absolute quantification of CBF without arterial input function measurements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23442733      PMCID: PMC3626495          DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/58/6/1903

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  34 in total

1.  Parametrically defined cerebral blood vessels as non-invasive blood input functions for brain PET studies.

Authors:  Marie-Claude Asselin; Vincent J Cunningham; Shigeko Amano; Roger N Gunn; Claude Nahmias
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2004-03-21       Impact factor: 3.609

2.  Accuracy of Head Motion Compensation for the HRRT: Comparison of Methods.

Authors:  Xiao Jin; Tim Mulnix; Beata Planeta-Wilson; Jean-Dominique Gallezot; Richard E Carson
Journal:  IEEE Nucl Sci Symp Conf Rec (1997)       Date:  2009-10-24

3.  On the use of image-derived input functions in oncological fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography studies.

Authors:  C J Hoekstra; O S Hoekstra; A A Lammertsma
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1999-11

4.  Comparison of image-derived and arterial input functions for estimating the rate of glucose metabolism in therapy-monitoring 18F-FDG PET studies.

Authors:  Lioe-Fee de Geus-Oei; Eric P Visser; Paul F M Krabbe; Bas A van Hoorn; Emile B Koenders; Antoon T Willemsen; Jan Pruim; Frans H M Corstens; Wim J G Oyen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.057

5.  Partial volume corrected image derived input functions for dynamic PET brain studies: methodology and validation for [11C]flumazenil.

Authors:  Jurgen E M Mourik; Mark Lubberink; Ursula M H Klumpers; Emile F Comans; Adriaan A Lammertsma; Ronald Boellaard
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-11-28       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Active contours without edges.

Authors:  T F Chan; L A Vese
Journal:  IEEE Trans Image Process       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 10.856

Review 7.  A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes.

Authors:  David Lesage; Elsa D Angelini; Isabelle Bloch; Gareth Funka-Lea
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 8.545

8.  Brain blood flow measured with intravenous H2(15)O. I. Theory and error analysis.

Authors:  P Herscovitch; J Markham; M E Raichle
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 10.057

9.  Carotid artery diameter in men and women and the relation to body and neck size.

Authors:  Jaroslaw Krejza; Michal Arkuszewski; Scott E Kasner; John Weigele; Andrzej Ustymowicz; Robert W Hurst; Brett L Cucchiara; Steven R Messe
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2006-02-23       Impact factor: 7.914

10.  Safety of radial arterial catheterization in PET research subjects.

Authors:  Benjamin A Everett; Maria A Oquendo; Anissa Abi-Dargham; Mitchell S Nobler; Davangere P Devanand; Sarah H Lisanby; J John Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-09-16       Impact factor: 10.057

View more
  18 in total

1.  Quantification of Positron Emission Tomography Data Using Simultaneous Estimation of the Input Function: Validation with Venous Blood and Replication of Clinical Studies.

Authors:  Elizabeth A Bartlett; Mala Ananth; Samantha Rossano; Mengru Zhang; Jie Yang; Shu-Fei Lin; Nabeel Nabulsi; Yiyun Huang; Francesca Zanderigo; Ramin V Parsey; Christine DeLorenzo
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2019-10       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 2.  Current status and future role of brain PET/MRI in clinical and research settings.

Authors:  P Werner; H Barthel; A Drzezga; O Sabri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Image-derived input function estimation on a TOF-enabled PET/MR for cerebral blood flow mapping.

Authors:  Mohammad Mehdi Khalighi; Timothy W Deller; Audrey Peiwen Fan; Praveen K Gulaka; Bin Shen; Prachi Singh; Jun-Hyung Park; Frederick T Chin; Greg Zaharchuk
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-02-03       Impact factor: 6.200

4.  A pilot study in epilepsy patients using simultaneous PET/MR.

Authors:  Yu-Shin Ding; Bang-Bin Chen; Christopher Glielmi; Kent Friedman; Orrin Devinsky
Journal:  Am J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2014-08-15

5.  Reconstruction of input functions from a dynamic PET image with sequential administration of 15O2 and [Formula: see text] for noninvasive and ultra-rapid measurement of CBF, OEF, and CMRO2.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kudomi; Yukito Maeda; Hiroyuki Yamamoto; Yuka Yamamoto; Tetsuhiro Hatakeyama; Yoshihiro Nishiyama
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2017-06-09       Impact factor: 6.200

6.  Evaluation of bias and variance in low-count OSEM list mode reconstruction.

Authors:  Y Jian; B Planeta; R E Carson
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2014-12-05       Impact factor: 3.609

7.  Image-derived input function with factor analysis and a-priori information.

Authors:  Urban Simončič; Paolo Zanotti-Fregonara
Journal:  Nucl Med Commun       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 1.690

8.  An analysis of whole body tracer kinetics in dynamic PET studies with application to image-based blood input function extraction.

Authors:  Jian Huang; Finbarr O'Sullivan
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 10.048

9.  Quantitative Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia With Positron Emission Tomography.

Authors:  Jae Ho Sohn; Spencer C Behr; Miguel Hernandez Pampaloni; Youngho Seo
Journal:  J Thorac Imaging       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 5.528

10.  Fully automated calculation of image-derived input function in simultaneous PET/MRI in a sheep model.

Authors:  Thies H Jochimsen; Vilia Zeisig; Jessica Schulz; Peter Werner; Marianne Patt; Jörg Patt; Antje Y Dreyer; Johannes Boltze; Henryk Barthel; Osama Sabri; Bernhard Sattler
Journal:  EJNMMI Phys       Date:  2016-02-13
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.