BACKGROUND: Given the wealth of data in the literature on schizophrenia endophenotypes, it is useful to have one source to reference their frequency data. We reviewed the literature on disease-liability associated variants in structural and functional magnetic resonance images (MRI), sensory processing measures, neuromotor abilities, neuropsychological measures, and physical characteristics in schizophrenia patients (SCZ), their first-degree relatives (REL), and healthy controls (HC). The purpose of this review was to provide a summary of the existing data on the most extensively published endophenotypes for schizophrenia. METHODS: We searched PubMed and MedLine for all studies on schizophrenia endophenotypes comparing SCZ to HC and/or REL to HC groups. Percent abnormal values, generally defined as >2 SD from the mean (in the direction of abnormality) and/or associated effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for each study. RESULTS: Combined, the articles reported an average 39.4% (SD=20.7%; range=2.2-100%) of abnormal values in SCZ, 28.1% (SD=16.6%; range=1.6-67.0%) abnormal values in REL, and 10.2% (SD=6.7%; range=0.0-34.6%) in HC groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are reviewed in the context of emerging hypotheses on schizophrenia endophenotypes, as well as a discussion of clustering trends among the various intermediate phenotypes. In addition, programs for future research are discussed, as instantiated in a few recent large-scale studies on multiple endophenotypes across patients, relatives, and healthy controls.
BACKGROUND: Given the wealth of data in the literature on schizophrenia endophenotypes, it is useful to have one source to reference their frequency data. We reviewed the literature on disease-liability associated variants in structural and functional magnetic resonance images (MRI), sensory processing measures, neuromotor abilities, neuropsychological measures, and physical characteristics in schizophreniapatients (SCZ), their first-degree relatives (REL), and healthy controls (HC). The purpose of this review was to provide a summary of the existing data on the most extensively published endophenotypes for schizophrenia. METHODS: We searched PubMed and MedLine for all studies on schizophrenia endophenotypes comparing SCZ to HC and/or REL to HC groups. Percent abnormal values, generally defined as >2 SD from the mean (in the direction of abnormality) and/or associated effect sizes (Cohen's d) were calculated for each study. RESULTS: Combined, the articles reported an average 39.4% (SD=20.7%; range=2.2-100%) of abnormal values in SCZ, 28.1% (SD=16.6%; range=1.6-67.0%) abnormal values in REL, and 10.2% (SD=6.7%; range=0.0-34.6%) in HC groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings are reviewed in the context of emerging hypotheses on schizophrenia endophenotypes, as well as a discussion of clustering trends among the various intermediate phenotypes. In addition, programs for future research are discussed, as instantiated in a few recent large-scale studies on multiple endophenotypes across patients, relatives, and healthy controls.
Authors: L Marsh; D Harris; K O Lim; M Beal; A L Hoff; K Minn; J G Csernansky; S DeMent; W O Faustman; E V Sullivan; A Pfefferbaum Journal: Arch Gen Psychiatry Date: 1997-12
Authors: S M Lawrie; H Whalley; J N Kestelman; S S Abukmeil; M Byrne; A Hodges; J E Rimmington; J J Best; D G Owens; E C Johnstone Journal: Lancet Date: 1999-01-02 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: Shashwath A Meda; Adrienne Gill; Michael C Stevens; Raymond P Lorenzoni; David C Glahn; Vince D Calhoun; John A Sweeney; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; Gunvant Thaker; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Biol Psychiatry Date: 2012-03-07 Impact factor: 13.382
Authors: Lauren E Ethridge; Melanie Soilleux; Paul A Nakonezny; James L Reilly; S Kristian Hill; Richard S E Keefe; Elliot S Gershon; Godfrey D Pearlson; Carol A Tamminga; Matcheri S Keshavan; John A Sweeney Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2014-09-26 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Shashwath A Meda; Gualberto Ruaño; Andreas Windemuth; Kasey O'Neil; Clifton Berwise; Sabra M Dunn; Leah E Boccaccio; Balaji Narayanan; Mohan Kocherla; Emma Sprooten; Matcheri S Keshavan; Carol A Tamminga; John A Sweeney; Brett A Clementz; Vince D Calhoun; Godfrey D Pearlson Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2014-04-28 Impact factor: 11.205