Literature DB >> 8923337

Clinical and experimental characteristics of "hypothetically psychosis prone" college students.

K Cadenhead1, C Kumar, D Braff.   

Abstract

The study of individuals at the boundaries of schizophrenia has historically involved genetic relatives of schizophrenia patients or individuals who meet criteria for schizotypal personality disorder (SPD). Recently, many investigators have turned to the use of psychometric scales, developed to measure psychotic traits or vulnerability to developing schizophrenia, to screen large populations of college students in order to identify individuals who are "psychosis prone" or "schizotypal". To help answer the question of whether students identified with psychometric scales are indeed psychosis prone, we screened 1115 college students with the Perceptual Aberration/ Magical Ideation (PerMag) and Physical Anhedonia (PhysAn) Scales. Individuals who scored 2 standard deviations (SD) above the mean on the scales were selected as experimental subjects (N = 13 PerMag, N = 10 PhysAn) and a subpopulation of matched subjects who scored less than 0.5 SD above the mean were selected as control subjects (N = 24). All subjects then received a full battery of tests, including structured clinical interviews, the MMPI, and psychophysiological measures of information processing, including prepulse inhibition and habituation of the human startle response, visual backward masking and reaction time measures. The results suggest that the PerMag scale, but not the PhysAn scale, identifies individuals with some psychotic, affective and anxiety symptoms when compared to the controls. Neither scale predicts a diagnosis of schizotypal personality disorder or deficits on measures of information processing that characterize schizophrenia or schizotypal personality disordered patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8923337     DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(96)00020-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Res        ISSN: 0022-3956            Impact factor:   4.791


  4 in total

1.  Development of a computerized assessment for visual masking.

Authors:  Michael Foster Green; Keith H Nuechterlein; Bruno Breitmeyer
Journal:  Int J Methods Psychiatr Res       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.035

Review 2.  Endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a selective review.

Authors:  Allyssa J Allen; Mélina E Griss; Bradley S Folley; Keith A Hawkins; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

3.  Prepulse inhibition of the acoustically evoked startle reflex in patients with an acute schizophrenic psychosis--a longitudinal study.

Authors:  Ulrich Meincke; Dina Mörth; Tatjana Voss; Bernhard Thelen; Mark A Geyer; Euphrosyne Gouzoulis-Mayfrank
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  2004-11-12       Impact factor: 5.270

4.  New visual information processing abnormality biomarker for the diagnosis of Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Ivan Koychev; Wael El-Deredy; John Francis William Deakin
Journal:  Expert Opin Med Diagn       Date:  2011-07-01
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.