Literature DB >> 16368076

A multivariate electrophysiological endophenotype, from a unitary cohort, shows greater research utility than any single feature in the Western Australian family study of schizophrenia.

Gregory W Price1, Patricia T Michie, Julie Johnston, Hamish Innes-Brown, Aaron Kent, Peter Clissa, Assen V Jablensky.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have found several electrophysiological endophenotypes that each co-varies individually with schizophrenia. This study extends these investigations to compare and contrast four electrophysiological endophenotype, mismatch negativity, P50, P300, and antisaccades, and analyze their covariance on the basis of a single cohort tested with all paradigms. We report a multivariate endophenotype that is maximally associated with diagnosis and evaluate this new endophenotype with respect to its application to genetic analysis.
METHODS: Group differences and covariance were analyzed for probands (n = 60), family members (n = 53), and control subjects (n = 44). Associations between individual endophenotypes and diagnostic groups, as well as between the multivariate endophenotype and diagnostic groups, were investigated with logistic regression.
RESULTS: Results from all four individual endophenotypes replicated previous findings of deficits in the proband group. The P50 and P300 endophenotypes similarly replicated significant deficits in the family member group, whereas mismatch negativity and antisaccade measures showed a trend. There was minimal correlation between the different endophenotypes. A logistic regression model based on all four features significantly represented the diagnostic grouping (chi(2) = 32.7; p < .001), with 80% accuracy in predicting group membership.
CONCLUSIONS: A multivariate endophenotype, based on a weighted combination of electrophysiological features, provides greater diagnostic classification power than any single endophenotype.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16368076     DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2005.09.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biol Psychiatry        ISSN: 0006-3223            Impact factor:   13.382


  49 in total

1.  Antisaccade performance in schizophrenia patients, their first-degree biological relatives, and community comparison subjects: data from the COGS study.

Authors:  Allen D Radant; Dorcas J Dobie; Monica E Calkins; Ann Olincy; David L Braff; Kristin S Cadenhead; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel E Gur; Ruben C Gur; Gregory A Light; Sean P Meichle; Steve P Millard; Jim Mintz; Keith H Nuechterlein; Nicholas J Schork; Larry J Seidman; Larry J Siever; Jeremy M Silverman; William S Stone; Neal R Swerdlow; Ming T Tsuang; Bruce I Turetsky; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 4.016

2.  Failure to find P50 suppression deficits in young first-episode patients with schizophrenia and clinically unaffected siblings.

Authors:  O M de Wilde; L J Bour; P M Dingemans; J H T M Koelman; D H Linszen
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2007-02-07       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 3.  Endophenotypes in schizophrenia: a selective review.

Authors:  Allyssa J Allen; Mélina E Griss; Bradley S Folley; Keith A Hawkins; Godfrey D Pearlson
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2009-02-15       Impact factor: 4.939

4.  Does performance on the standard antisaccade task meet the co-familiality criterion for an endophenotype?

Authors:  Deborah L Levy; Elizabeth A Bowman; Larry Abel; Olga Krastoshevsky; Verena Krause; Nancy R Mendell
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 2.310

5.  Are auditory-evoked frequency and duration mismatch negativity deficits endophenotypic for schizophrenia? High-density electrical mapping in clinically unaffected first-degree relatives and first-episode and chronic schizophrenia.

Authors:  Elena Magno; Sherlyn Yeap; Jogin H Thakore; Hugh Garavan; Pierfilippo De Sanctis; John J Foxe
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2008-05-09       Impact factor: 13.382

Review 6.  Electrophysiological Endophenotypes for Schizophrenia.

Authors:  Emily M Owens; Peter Bachman; David C Glahn; Carrie E Bearden
Journal:  Harv Rev Psychiatry       Date:  2016 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 3.732

7.  Profile of auditory information-processing deficits in schizophrenia.

Authors:  Bruce I Turetsky; Warren B Bilker; Steven J Siegel; Christian G Kohler; Raquel E Gur
Journal:  Psychiatry Res       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 3.222

8.  Learned irrelevance and associative learning is attenuated in individuals at risk for psychosis but not in asymptomatic first-degree relatives of schizophrenia patients: translational state markers of psychosis?

Authors:  Ariane T Orosz; Joram Feldon; Andor E Simon; Leonie M Hilti; Kerstin Gruber; Benjamin K Yee; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig
Journal:  Schizophr Bull       Date:  2010-01-15       Impact factor: 9.306

Review 9.  Shared heritability of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and autism spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Nanda N J Rommelse; Barbara Franke; Hilde M Geurts; Catharina A Hartman; Jan K Buitelaar
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2010-02-11       Impact factor: 4.785

10.  Prioritizing schizophrenia endophenotypes for future genetic studies: An example using data from the COGS-1 family study.

Authors:  Steven P Millard; Jane Shofer; David Braff; Monica Calkins; Kristin Cadenhead; Robert Freedman; Michael F Green; Tiffany A Greenwood; Raquel Gur; Ruben Gur; Laura C Lazzeroni; Gregory A Light; Ann Olincy; Keith Nuechterlein; Larry Seidman; Larry Siever; Jeremy Silverman; William S Stone; Joyce Sprock; Catherine A Sugar; Neal R Swerdlow; Ming Tsuang; Bruce Turetsky; Allen Radant; Debby W Tsuang
Journal:  Schizophr Res       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 4.939

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.