BACKGROUND: The identification of surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival may shorten the length of clinical trials for prostate cancer. We evaluated distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure as potential surrogates for prostate cancer-specific survival by use of data from the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group 92-02 randomized trial. METHODS:Patients (n = 1554 randomly assigned and 1521 evaluable for this analysis) with locally advanced prostate cancer had been treated with 4 months ofneoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy with external beam radiation therapy and then randomly assigned to no additional therapy (control arm) or 24 additional months of androgen deprivation therapy (experimental arm). Data from landmark analyses at 3 and 5 years for general clinical treatment failure (defined as documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, initiation of androgen deprivation therapy, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 25 ng/mL or higher after radiation therapy) and/or distant metastasis were tested as surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years by use of Prentice's four criteria. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: At 3 years, 1364 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Both distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years were consistent with all four of Prentice's criteria for being surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. At 5 years, 1178 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Although prostate cancer-specific survival was not statistically significantly different between treatment arms at 5 years (P = .08), both endpoints were consistent with Prentice's remaining criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years may be candidate surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. These endpoints, however, must be validated in other datasets.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: The identification of surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival may shorten the length of clinical trials for prostate cancer. We evaluated distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure as potential surrogates for prostate cancer-specific survival by use of data from the Radiation Therapy and Oncology Group 92-02 randomized trial. METHODS:Patients (n = 1554 randomly assigned and 1521 evaluable for this analysis) with locally advanced prostate cancer had been treated with 4 months of neoadjuvant and concurrent androgen deprivation therapy with external beam radiation therapy and then randomly assigned to no additional therapy (control arm) or 24 additional months of androgen deprivation therapy (experimental arm). Data from landmark analyses at 3 and 5 years for general clinical treatment failure (defined as documented local disease progression, regional or distant metastasis, initiation of androgen deprivation therapy, or a prostate-specific antigen level of 25 ng/mL or higher after radiation therapy) and/or distant metastasis were tested as surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years by use of Prentice's four criteria. All statistical tests were two-sided. RESULTS: At 3 years, 1364 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Both distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years were consistent with all four of Prentice's criteria for being surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. At 5 years, 1178 patients were alive and contributed data for analysis. Although prostate cancer-specific survival was not statistically significantly different between treatment arms at 5 years (P = .08), both endpoints were consistent with Prentice's remaining criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Distant metastasis and general clinical treatment failure at 3 years may be candidate surrogate endpoints for prostate cancer-specific survival at 10 years. These endpoints, however, must be validated in other datasets.
Authors: Richard K Valicenti; Michelle DeSilvio; Gerald E Hanks; Arthur Porter; Harmar Brereton; Seth A Rosenthal; William U Shipley; Howard M Sandler Journal: Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys Date: 2006-09-18 Impact factor: 7.038
Authors: Daniel P Petrylak; Donna Pauler Ankerst; Caroline S Jiang; Catherine M Tangen; Maha H A Hussain; Primo N Lara; Jeffrey A Jones; Mary Ellen Taplin; Patrick A Burch; Manish Kohli; Mitchell C Benson; Eric J Small; Derek Raghavan; E David Crawford Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2006-04-19 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Stephen J Freedland; Elizabeth B Humphreys; Leslie A Mangold; Mario Eisenberger; Frederick J Dorey; Patrick C Walsh; Alan W Partin Journal: JAMA Date: 2005-07-27 Impact factor: 56.272
Authors: M V Pilepich; J M Krall; M al-Sarraf; M J John; R L Doggett; W T Sause; C A Lawton; R A Abrams; M Rotman; P Rubin Journal: Urology Date: 1995-04 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Onisuru T Okotie; William J Aronson; Jeff A Wieder; Yen Liao; Fred Dorey; Jean B DeKERNION; Stephen J Freedland Journal: J Urol Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Gerald E Hanks; Thomas F Pajak; Arthur Porter; David Grignon; Harmart Brereton; Varagur Venkatesan; Eric M Horwitz; Colleen Lawton; Seth A Rosenthal; Howard M Sandler; William U Shipley Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2003-11-01 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Christopher Sweeney; Mari Nakabayashi; Meredith Regan; Wanling Xie; Julia Hayes; Nancy Keating; Suhui Li; Tomas Philipson; Marc Buyse; Susan Halabi; Philip Kantoff; A Oliver Sartor; Howard Soule; Brandon Mahal Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2015-09-25 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: James J Dignam; Daniel A Hamstra; Herbert Lepor; David Grignon; Harmar Brereton; Adam Currey; Seth Rosenthal; Kenneth L Zeitzer; Varagur M Venkatesan; Eric M Horwitz; Thomas M Pisansky; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2018-12-07 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: William C Jackson; Ming Tang; Matthew J Schipper; Howard M Sandler; Zachary S Zumsteg; Jason A Efstathiou; William U Shipley; Wendy Seiferheld; Himanshu R Lukka; Jean-Paul Bahary; Anthony L Zietman; Thomas M Pisansky; Kenneth L Zeitzer; William A Hall; Robert T Dess; Richard D Lovett; Alexander G Balogh; Felix Y Feng; Daniel E Spratt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 50.717
Authors: Ally Olotu; Philippe Moris; Jedidah Mwacharo; Johan Vekemans; Domtila Kimani; Michel Janssens; Oscar Kai; Erik Jongert; Marc Lievens; Amanda Leach; Tonya Villafana; Barbara Savarese; Kevin Marsh; Joe Cohen; Philip Bejon Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-10-06 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Ricky A Sharma; Ruth Plummer; Julie K Stock; Tessa A Greenhalgh; Ozlem Ataman; Stephen Kelly; Robert Clay; Richard A Adams; Richard D Baird; Lucinda Billingham; Sarah R Brown; Sean Buckland; Helen Bulbeck; Anthony J Chalmers; Glen Clack; Aaron N Cranston; Lars Damstrup; Roberta Ferraldeschi; Martin D Forster; Julian Golec; Russell M Hagan; Emma Hall; Axel-R Hanauske; Kevin J Harrington; Tom Haswell; Maria A Hawkins; Tim Illidge; Hazel Jones; Andrew S Kennedy; Fiona McDonald; Thorsten Melcher; James P B O'Connor; John R Pollard; Mark P Saunders; David Sebag-Montefiore; Melanie Smitt; John Staffurth; Ian J Stratford; Stephen R Wedge Journal: Nat Rev Clin Oncol Date: 2016-06-01 Impact factor: 66.675