J M Taylor1, K A Griffith, H M Sandler. 1. Department of Biostatistics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104, USA. jmgt@umich.edu
Abstract
PURPOSE: The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) published a consensus panel definition of biochemical failure following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. In this paper, we develop a series of alternative definitions of biochemical failure. Using data from 688 patients, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the various definitions, with respect to a defined "clinically meaningful" outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ASTRO definition of biochemical failure requires 3 consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We considered several modifications to the standard definition: to require PSA rises of a certain magnitude, to consider 2 instead of 3 rises, to require the final PSA value to be greater than a fixed cutoff level, and to define biochemical failure based on the slope of PSA over 1, 1.5, or 2 years. A clinically meaningful failure is defined as local recurrence, distant metastases, initiation of unplanned hormonal therapy, unplanned radical prostatectomy, or a PSA > 25 later than 6 months after radiation. RESULTS: Requiring the final PSA in a series of consecutive rises to be larger than 1.5 ng/mL increased the specificity of biochemical failure. For a fixed specificity, defining biochemical failure based on 2 consecutive rises, or the slope over the last year, could increase the sensitivity by up to approximately 20%, compared to the ASTRO definition. Using a rule based on the slope over the previous year or 2 rises leads to a slightly earlier detection of biochemical failure than does the ASTRO definition. Even with the best rule, only approximately 20% of true failures are biochemically detected more than 1 year before the clinically meaningful event time. CONCLUSION: There is potential for improvement in the ASTRO consensus definition of biochemical failure. Further research is needed, in studies with long follow-up times, to evaluate the relationship between various definitions of biochemical failure and true clinical outcome.
PURPOSE: The American Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (ASTRO) published a consensus panel definition of biochemical failure following radiation therapy for prostate cancer. In this paper, we develop a series of alternative definitions of biochemical failure. Using data from 688 patients, we evaluated the sensitivity and specificity of the various definitions, with respect to a defined "clinically meaningful" outcome. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The ASTRO definition of biochemical failure requires 3 consecutive rises in prostate-specific antigen (PSA). We considered several modifications to the standard definition: to require PSA rises of a certain magnitude, to consider 2 instead of 3 rises, to require the final PSA value to be greater than a fixed cutoff level, and to define biochemical failure based on the slope of PSA over 1, 1.5, or 2 years. A clinically meaningful failure is defined as local recurrence, distant metastases, initiation of unplanned hormonal therapy, unplanned radical prostatectomy, or a PSA > 25 later than 6 months after radiation. RESULTS: Requiring the final PSA in a series of consecutive rises to be larger than 1.5 ng/mL increased the specificity of biochemical failure. For a fixed specificity, defining biochemical failure based on 2 consecutive rises, or the slope over the last year, could increase the sensitivity by up to approximately 20%, compared to the ASTRO definition. Using a rule based on the slope over the previous year or 2 rises leads to a slightly earlier detection of biochemical failure than does the ASTRO definition. Even with the best rule, only approximately 20% of true failures are biochemically detected more than 1 year before the clinically meaningful event time. CONCLUSION: There is potential for improvement in the ASTRO consensus definition of biochemical failure. Further research is needed, in studies with long follow-up times, to evaluate the relationship between various definitions of biochemical failure and true clinical outcome.
Authors: Michael E Ray; Kyounghwa Bae; Maha H A Hussain; Gerald E Hanks; William U Shipley; Howard M Sandler Journal: J Natl Cancer Inst Date: 2009-02-10 Impact factor: 13.506
Authors: Ashraf J Abusamra; Shouki Bazarbashi; Yasser Bahader; Hussain Kushi; Danny Rabah; Dany Rabbah; Naser Al Bogami; Khalid Al Ghamdi; Abdullah Al Ghamdi; Khaled Balaraj; Raouf Seyam; Mohammed Al Otaibi; Eyad Al Saeed Journal: Urol Ann Date: 2011-03
Authors: Ashraf Abusamra; Esam Murshid; Hussain Kushi; Sultan Alkhateeb; Mubarak Al-Mansour; Ahmad Saadeddin; Danny Rabah; Shouki Bazarbashi; Mohammed Alotaibi; Abdullah Alghamdi; Khalid Alghamdi; Abdullah Alsharm; Imran Ahmad Journal: Urol Ann Date: 2016 Apr-Jun