Literature DB >> 456449

Effects of inertial load and velocity on the braking process of voluntary limb movements.

F Lestienne.   

Abstract

The aim of this study has been to identify, in humans, the braking process underlying voluntary forearm movements performed at various velocities and amplitudes and against differential inertial loads. The procedure used to estimate the parameters of the braking process involved kinematic analysis of the movement and measurement of alpha-motoneural input to flexor and extensor muscles by recording electromyographic (EMG) activity. We have shown that when the agonist force does not exceed the passive viscoelastic tension developed by the extensor and flexor muscles, the movement can be braked by the viscoelastic forces alone. In contrast, above this force threshold, it was found that the motor output in agonist and antagonist muscles consists of well defined bursts of EMG activity, first in agonist then in antagonist muscles. The timing of these two bursts (duration of the agonist activity and onset of the antagonist activity) are clearly correlated with the value of the peak velocity. For the same peak velocity, the addition of inertial loads increase the excitation level of both agonist and antagonist muscles but does not change the timing of the EMG bursts. The discussion of these results focuses on the concept of "unit of movement" organized to reduce the large number of possible patterns of activation of the muscles acting on the same joint.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1979        PMID: 456449     DOI: 10.1007/bf00236760

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  16 in total

1.  An electromyographic analysis of stepping in the cat.

Authors:  I ENGBERG; A LUNDBERG
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1962-04-15

2.  Intrinsic feedback factors producing inertial compensation in muscle.

Authors:  L D Partridge
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2008-12-31       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 3.  Neurophysiology of locomotor automatism.

Authors:  M L Shik; G N Orlovsky
Journal:  Physiol Rev       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 37.312

4.  [Determination of the visco-elastic properties of human muscle in situ (author's transl)].

Authors:  F Lestienne; E Pertuzon
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1974-02-05

5.  Studies on the control of some simple motor tasks. I. Relations between parameters of movements and EMG activities.

Authors:  C A Terzuolo; J F Soechting; P Viviani
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  1973-08-17       Impact factor: 3.252

Review 6.  Motor mechanisms: the role of the pyramidal system in motor control.

Authors:  V B Brooks; S D Stoney
Journal:  Annu Rev Physiol       Date:  1971       Impact factor: 19.318

7.  Mechanisms underlying achievement of final head position.

Authors:  E Bizzi; A Polit; P Morasso
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

8.  The relationship between speed and amplitude of the fastest voluntary contractions of human arm muscles.

Authors:  H J Freund; H J Büdingen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-01-18       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  The control of rapid limb movement in the cat. II. Scaling of isometric force adjustments.

Authors:  C Ghez; D Vicario
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1978-10-13       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Servo action in the human thumb.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  68 in total

1.  Trajectories of arm pointing movements on the sagittal plane vary with both direction and speed.

Authors:  Charalambos Papaxanthis; Thierry Pozzo; Marco Schieppati
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2002-12-19       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Muscle strength testing: evaluation of tests of explosive force production.

Authors:  Dragan M Mirkov; Aleksandar Nedeljkovic; Sladjan Milanovic; Slobodan Jaric
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2003-10-02       Impact factor: 3.078

Review 3.  A critical evaluation of the force control hypothesis in motor control.

Authors:  David J Ostry; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Kinematic models and human elbow flexion movements: quantitative analysis.

Authors:  A W Wiegner; M M Wierzbicka
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Novel muscle patterns for reaching after cervical spinal cord injury: a case for motor redundancy.

Authors:  Gail F Koshland; James C Galloway; Becky Farley
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-03-15       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Threshold control of motor actions prevents destabilizing effects of proprioceptive delays.

Authors:  Jean-François Pilon; Anatol G Feldman
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-05-05       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Muscle coordination in complex movements during Jeté in skilled ballet dancers.

Authors:  Marie-Charlotte Lepelley; Francine Thullier; Jérôme Koral; Francis G Lestienne
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-06-02       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  BOLD coherence reveals segregated functional neural interactions when adapting to distinct torque perturbations.

Authors:  Eugene Tunik; Paul J Schmitt; Scott T Grafton
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2007-01-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Adjustments of motor pattern for load compensation via modulated activations of muscle synergies during natural behaviors.

Authors:  Vincent C K Cheung; Andrea d'Avella; Emilio Bizzi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-12-17       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Control of asymmetrical bimanual movements.

Authors:  S P Swinnen; D E Young; C B Walter; D J Serrien
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.972

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.