Literature DB >> 19210729

A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Huiping Xu1, Bruce A Craig.   

Abstract

Traditional latent class modeling has been widely applied to assess the accuracy of dichotomous diagnostic tests. These models, however, assume that the tests are independent conditional on the true disease status, which is rarely valid in practice. Alternative models using probit analysis have been proposed to incorporate dependence among tests, but these models consider restricted correlation structures. In this article, we propose a probit latent class model that allows a general correlation structure. When combined with some helpful diagnostics, this model provides a more flexible framework from which to evaluate the correlation structure and model fit. Our model encompasses several other PLC models but uses a parameter-expanded Monte Carlo EM algorithm to obtain the maximum-likelihood estimates. The parameter-expanded EM algorithm was designed to accelerate the convergence rate of the EM algorithm by expanding the complete-data model to include a larger set of parameters and it ensures a simple solution in fitting the PLC model. We demonstrate our estimation and model selection methods using a simulation study and two published medical studies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19210729     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2008.01194.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  12 in total

1.  Extending the latent variable model for extra correlated longitudinal dichotomous responses.

Authors:  Matthew M Hutmacher; Jonathan L French
Journal:  J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn       Date:  2011-10-22       Impact factor: 2.745

2.  A Bayesian hierarchical model for network meta-analysis of multiple diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Xiaoye Ma; Qinshu Lian; Haitao Chu; Joseph G Ibrahim; Yong Chen
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 5.899

3.  A Bayesian Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Model for Network Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests.

Authors:  Qinshu Lian; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 5.033

Review 4.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  A Bayesian approach to strengthen inference for case-control studies with multiple error-prone exposure assessments.

Authors:  Jing Zhang; Stephen R Cole; David B Richardson; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2013-05-10       Impact factor: 2.373

6.  A fast Monte Carlo EM algorithm for estimation in latent class model analysis with an application to assess diagnostic accuracy for cervical neoplasia in women with AGC.

Authors:  Le Kang; Randy Carter; Kathleen Darcy; James Kauderer; Shu-Yuan Liao
Journal:  J Appl Stat       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.404

7.  Model-based clustering for assessing the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers and mixed type tests.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Krisztian Sebestyen; Sarah E Monsell
Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal       Date:  2016-11-02       Impact factor: 1.681

8.  A practical approach for incorporating dependence among fields in probabilistic record linkage.

Authors:  Joanne K Daggy; Huiping Xu; Siu L Hui; Roland E Gamache; Shaun J Grannis
Journal:  BMC Med Inform Decis Mak       Date:  2013-08-30       Impact factor: 2.796

9.  Different latent class models were used and evaluated for assessing the accuracy of campylobacter diagnostic tests: overcoming imperfect reference standards?

Authors:  J Asselineau; A Paye; E Bessède; P Perez; C Proust-Lima
Journal:  Epidemiol Infect       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 2.451

10.  Comparing somatic mutation-callers: beyond Venn diagrams.

Authors:  Su Yeon Kim; Terence P Speed
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.169

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.