Literature DB >> 24163493

A fast Monte Carlo EM algorithm for estimation in latent class model analysis with an application to assess diagnostic accuracy for cervical neoplasia in women with AGC.

Le Kang1, Randy Carter, Kathleen Darcy, James Kauderer, Shu-Yuan Liao.   

Abstract

In this article we use a latent class model (LCM) with prevalence modeled as a function of covariates to assess diagnostic test accuracy in situations where the true disease status is not observed, but observations on three or more conditionally independent diagnostic tests are available. A fast Monte Carlo EM (MCEM) algorithm with binary (disease) diagnostic data is implemented to estimate parameters of interest; namely, sensitivity, specificity, and prevalence of the disease as a function of covariates. To obtain standard errors for confidence interval construction of estimated parameters, the missing information principle is applied to adjust information matrix estimates. We compare the adjusted information matrix based standard error estimates with the bootstrap standard error estimates both obtained using the fast MCEM algorithm through an extensive Monte Carlo study. Simulation demonstrates that the adjusted information matrix approach estimates the standard error similarly with the bootstrap methods under certain scenarios. The bootstrap percentile intervals have satisfactory coverage probabilities. We then apply the LCM analysis to a real data set of 122 subjects from a Gynecologic Oncology Group (GOG) study of significant cervical lesion (S-CL) diagnosis in women with atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGC) to compare the diagnostic accuracy of a histology-based evaluation, a CA-IX biomarker-based test and a human papillomavirus (HPV) DNA test.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MCEM estimation; adjusted information matrix; bootstrap standard errors; diagnostic accuracy; imperfect gold standard; latent class model

Year:  2013        PMID: 24163493      PMCID: PMC3806648          DOI: 10.1080/02664763.2013.825704

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Stat        ISSN: 0266-4763            Impact factor:   1.404


  18 in total

1.  A cautionary note on the robustness of latent class models for estimating diagnostic error without a gold standard.

Authors:  Paul S Albert; Lori E Dodd
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 5.899

Review 3.  Endocervical glandular atypia: a "new" problem for the cytologist.

Authors:  D C Wilbur
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 4.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.

Authors:  S L Hui; X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

5.  Latent variable modeling of diagnostic accuracy.

Authors:  I Yang; M P Becker
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 6.  Estimation of test error rates, disease prevalence and relative risk from misclassified data: a review.

Authors:  S D Walter; L M Irwig
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.437

7.  Results of the clinical evaluation of atypical glandular cells of undetermined significance (AGCUS) detected on cervical cytology screening.

Authors:  A W Kennedy; S S Salmieri; S L Wirth; C V Biscotti; L J Tuason; M J Travarca
Journal:  Gynecol Oncol       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 5.482

8.  Primer on certain elements of medical decision making.

Authors:  B J McNeil; E Keller; S J Adelstein
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1975-07-31       Impact factor: 91.245

9.  The assessment of diagnostic tests. A survey of current medical research.

Authors:  S B Sheps; M T Schechter
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1984-11-02       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Prevalence of HPV infection among females in the United States.

Authors:  Eileen F Dunne; Elizabeth R Unger; Maya Sternberg; Geraldine McQuillan; David C Swan; Sonya S Patel; Lauri E Markowitz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2007-02-28       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.