Literature DB >> 28966420

Model-based clustering for assessing the prognostic value of imaging biomarkers and mixed type tests.

Zheyu Wang1, Krisztian Sebestyen1, Sarah E Monsell2.   

Abstract

A model-based clustering method is proposed to address two research aims in Alzheimer's disease (AD): to evaluate the accuracy of imaging biomarkers in AD prognosis, and to integrate biomarker information and standard clinical test results into the diagnoses. One challenge in such biomarker studies is that it is often desired or necessary to conduct the evaluation without relying on clinical diagnoses or some other standard references. This is because (1) biomarkers may provide prognostic information long before any standard reference can be acquired; (2) these references are often based on or provide unfair advantage to standard tests. Therefore, they can mask the prognostic value of a useful biomarker, especially when the biomarker is much more accurate than the standard tests. In addition, the biomarkers and existing tests may be of mixed type and vastly different distributions. A model-based clustering method based on finite mixture modeling framework is introduced. The model allows for the inclusion of mixed typed manifest variables with possible differential covariates to evaluate the prognostic value of biomarkers in addition to standard tests without relying on potentially inaccurate reference diagnoses. Maximum likelihood parameter estimation is carried out via the EM algorithm. Accuracy measures and the ROC curves of the biomarkers are derived subsequently. Finally, the method is illustrated with a real example in AD.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Biomarkers; Diagnostic tests; Differential covariate effect; Finite mixture; Imperfect gold standard; Latent variable model

Year:  2016        PMID: 28966420      PMCID: PMC5613685          DOI: 10.1016/j.csda.2016.10.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Comput Stat Data Anal        ISSN: 0167-9473            Impact factor:   1.681


  27 in total

1.  Estimation of operating characteristics for dependent diagnostic tests based on latent Markov models.

Authors:  R J Cook; E T Ng; M O Meade
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2000-12       Impact factor: 2.571

2.  Prediction of AD with MRI-based hippocampal volume in mild cognitive impairment.

Authors:  C R Jack; R C Petersen; Y C Xu; P C O'Brien; G E Smith; R J Ivnik; B F Boeve; S C Waring; E G Tangalos; E Kokmen
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1999-04-22       Impact factor: 9.910

3.  Insights into latent class analysis of diagnostic test performance.

Authors:  Margaret Sullivan Pepe; Holly Janes
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-11-03       Impact factor: 5.899

4.  MRI and CSF biomarkers in normal, MCI, and AD subjects: predicting future clinical change.

Authors:  P Vemuri; H J Wiste; S D Weigand; L M Shaw; J Q Trojanowski; M W Weiner; D S Knopman; R C Petersen; C R Jack
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2009-07-28       Impact factor: 9.910

Review 5.  Evaluation of diagnostic tests without gold standards.

Authors:  S L Hui; X H Zhou
Journal:  Stat Methods Med Res       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 3.021

6.  The Clinical Dementia Rating (CDR): current version and scoring rules.

Authors:  J C Morris
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 9.910

7.  ApoE-4 and age at onset of Alzheimer's disease: the NIMH genetics initiative.

Authors:  D Blacker; J L Haines; L Rodes; H Terwedow; R C Go; L E Harrell; R T Perry; S S Bassett; G Chase; D Meyers; M S Albert; R Tanzi
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  1997-01       Impact factor: 9.910

8.  Early diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease: contribution of structural neuroimaging.

Authors:  Gaël Chetelat; Jean-Claude Baron
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 6.556

Review 9.  Classification and epidemiology of MCI.

Authors:  Rosebud Roberts; David S Knopman
Journal:  Clin Geriatr Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 3.076

Review 10.  Estimation of diagnostic test accuracy without full verification: a review of latent class methods.

Authors:  John Collins; Minh Huynh
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2014-06-09       Impact factor: 2.373

View more
  1 in total

1.  AD risk score for the early phases of disease based on unsupervised machine learning.

Authors:  Zheyu Wang; Zhuojun Tang; Yuxin Zhu; Corinne Pettigrew; Anja Soldan; Alden Gross; Marilyn Albert
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2020-07-30       Impact factor: 21.566

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.