Literature DB >> 31777410

A Bayesian Hierarchical Summary Receiver Operating Characteristic Model for Network Meta-analysis of Diagnostic Tests.

Qinshu Lian1, James S Hodges1, Haitao Chu1.   

Abstract

In studies evaluating the accuracy of diagnostic tests, three designs are commonly used, crossover, randomized, and non-comparative. Existing methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic tests mainly consider the simple cases in which the reference test in all or none of the studies can be considered a gold standard test, and in which all studies use either a randomized or non-comparative design. The proliferation of diagnostic instruments and the diversity of study designs create a need for more general methods to combine studies that include or do not include a gold standard test and that use various designs. This paper extends the Bayesian hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model to network meta-analysis of diagnostic tests to simultaneously compare multiple tests within a missing data framework. The method accounts for correlations between multiple tests and for heterogeneity between studies. It also allows different studies to include different subsets of diagnostic tests and provides flexibility in the choice of summary statistics. The model is evaluated using simulations and illustrated using real data on tests for deep vein thrombosis, with sensitivity analyses.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bayesian hierarchical model; Diagnostic tests; Missing data; Multiple tests comparison; Network meta-analysis

Year:  2018        PMID: 31777410      PMCID: PMC6880940          DOI: 10.1080/01621459.2018.1476239

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc        ISSN: 0162-1459            Impact factor:   5.033


  37 in total

1.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with imperfect reference standards.

Authors:  S D Walter; L Irwig; P P Glasziou
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 6.437

2.  Bayesian approaches to modeling the conditional dependence between multiple diagnostic tests.

Authors:  N Dendukuri; L Joseph
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.571

3.  Meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy assessment studies with varying number of thresholds.

Authors:  V Dukic; C Gatsonis
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.571

Review 4.  Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.

Authors:  Johannes B Reitsma; Afina S Glas; Anne W S Rutjes; Rob J P M Scholten; Patrick M Bossuyt; Aeilko H Zwinderman
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 6.437

5.  A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Roger M Harbord; Jonathan J Deeks; Matthias Egger; Penny Whiting; Jonathan A C Sterne
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2006-05-11       Impact factor: 5.899

6.  A probit latent class model with general correlation structures for evaluating accuracy of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  Huiping Xu; Bruce A Craig
Journal:  Biometrics       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.571

7.  Methods for the joint meta-analysis of multiple tests.

Authors:  Thomas A Trikalinos; David C Hoaglin; Kevin M Small; Norma Terrin; Christopher H Schmid
Journal:  Res Synth Methods       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 5.273

8.  Comparison of four strategies for diagnosing deep vein thrombosis: a cost-effectiveness analysis.

Authors:  N Perone; H Bounameaux; A Perrier
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 4.965

9.  Evaluation of D-dimer in the diagnosis of suspected deep-vein thrombosis.

Authors:  Philip S Wells; David R Anderson; Marc Rodger; Melissa Forgie; Clive Kearon; Jonathan Dreyer; George Kovacs; Michael Mitchell; Bernard Lewandowski; Michael J Kovacs
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-09-25       Impact factor: 91.245

10.  Network-meta analysis made easy: detection of inconsistency using factorial analysis-of-variance models.

Authors:  Hans-Peter Piepho
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2014-05-10       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Bayesian Hierarchical CACE Model Accounting for Incomplete Noncompliance With Application to a Meta-analysis of Epidural Analgesia on Cesarean Section.

Authors:  Jincheng Zhou; James S Hodges; Haitao Chu
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 5.033

2.  A Bayesian multivariate meta-analysis of prevalence data.

Authors:  Lianne Siegel; Kyle Rudser; Siobhan Sutcliffe; Alayne Markland; Linda Brubaker; Sheila Gahagan; Ann E Stapleton; Haitao Chu
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 2.373

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.