Literature DB >> 11000394

Perception of two-dimensional, simulated ego-motion trajectories from optic flow.

R J Bertin1, I Israël, M Lappe.   

Abstract

A veridical percept of ego-motion is normally derived from a combination of visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive signals. A previous study showed that blindfolded subjects can accurately perceive passively travelled straight or curved trajectories provided that the orientation of the head remained constant along the trajectory. When they were turned (whole-body, head-fixed) relative to the trajectory, errors occurred. We ask whether vision allows for better path perception in that situation, to correct or complement vestibular perception. Seated, stationary subjects wore a head mounted display showing optic flow stimuli which simulated linear or curvilinear 2D trajectories over a horizontal ground plane. The observer's orientation was either fixed in space, fixed relative to the path, or changed relative to both. After presentation, subjects reproduced the perceived movement with a model vehicle, of which position and orientation were recorded. They tended to correctly perceive ego-rotation (yaw), but they perceive orientation as fixed relative to trajectory or (unlike in the vestibular study) to space. This caused trajectory misperception when body rotation was wrongly attributed to a rotation of the path. Visual perception was very similar to vestibular perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2000        PMID: 11000394     DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(00)00134-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vision Res        ISSN: 0042-6989            Impact factor:   1.886


  7 in total

1.  Visuo-vestibular interaction in the reconstruction of travelled trajectories.

Authors:  R J V Bertin; A Berthoz
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-11-05       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Whole-motion model of perception during forward- and backward-facing centrifuge runs.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Arturs Vrublevskis; Lindsay E Carlson
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 3.  Constructive perception of self-motion.

Authors:  Jan E Holly; Gin McCollum
Journal:  J Vestib Res       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.435

4.  Mathematical requirements of visual-vestibular integration.

Authors:  Douglas A Hanes
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 2.259

5.  Keeping track of the distance from home by leaky integration along veering paths.

Authors:  Markus Lappe; Maren Stiels; Harald Frenz; Jack M Loomis
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Storing upright turns: how visual and vestibular cues interact during the encoding and recalling process.

Authors:  Manuel Vidal; Heinrich H Bülthoff
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Vergence nystagmus induced by motion in the ground plane: normal response characteristics.

Authors:  Dongsheng Yang; Mingxia Zhu; Chang H Kim; Richard W Hertle
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2007-03-23       Impact factor: 1.886

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.