Literature DB >> 21095231

Speech-induced suppression of evoked auditory fields in children who stutter.

Deryk S Beal1, Maher A Quraan, Douglas O Cheyne, Margot J Taylor, Vincent L Gracco, Luc F De Nil.   

Abstract

Auditory responses to speech sounds that are self-initiated are suppressed compared to responses to the same speech sounds during passive listening. This phenomenon is referred to as speech-induced suppression, a potentially important feedback-mediated speech-motor control process. In an earlier study, we found that both adults who do and do not stutter demonstrated a reduced amplitude of the auditory M50 and M100 responses to speech during active production relative to passive listening. It is unknown if auditory responses to self-initiated speech-motor acts are suppressed in children or if the phenomenon differs between children who do and do not stutter. As stuttering is a developmental speech disorder, examining speech-induced suppression in children may identify possible neural differences underlying stuttering close to its time of onset. We used magnetoencephalography to determine the presence of speech-induced suppression in children and to characterize the properties of speech-induced suppression in children who stutter. We examined the auditory M50 as this was the earliest robust response reproducible across our child participants and the most likely to reflect a motor-to-auditory relation. Both children who do and do not stutter demonstrated speech-induced suppression of the auditory M50. However, children who stutter had a delayed auditory M50 peak latency to vowel sounds compared to children who do not stutter indicating a possible deficiency in their ability to efficiently integrate auditory speech information for the purpose of establishing neural representations of speech sounds.
Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2010        PMID: 21095231      PMCID: PMC3042852          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.11.026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  79 in total

1.  Functional neuroimaging of cerebellar activation during single word reading and verb generation in stuttering and nonstuttering adults.

Authors:  L F De Nil; R M Kroll; S Houle
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2001-04-20       Impact factor: 3.046

2.  An auditory-feedback-based neural network model of speech production that is robust to developmental changes in the size and shape of the articulatory system.

Authors:  D E Callan; R D Kent; F H Guenther; H K Vorperian
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.297

Review 3.  Dorsal and ventral streams: a framework for understanding aspects of the functional anatomy of language.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  2004 May-Jun

4.  Neural mechanisms underlying auditory feedback control of speech.

Authors:  Jason A Tourville; Kevin J Reilly; Frank H Guenther
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-10-11       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Developmental changes in refractoriness of the neuromagnetic M100 in children.

Authors:  D C Rojas; J R Walker; J L Sheeder; P D Teale; M L Reite
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  1998-05-11       Impact factor: 1.837

6.  Statistical parametric mapping: assessment of application in children.

Authors:  O Muzik; D C Chugani; C Juhász; C Shen; H T Chugani
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Sequential processing of lexical, grammatical, and phonological information within Broca's area.

Authors:  Ned T Sahin; Steven Pinker; Sydney S Cash; Donald Schomer; Eric Halgren
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-10-16       Impact factor: 47.728

8.  Morphological brain differences between adult stutterers and non-stutterers.

Authors:  Lutz Jäncke; Jürgen Hänggi; Helmuth Steinmetz
Journal:  BMC Neurol       Date:  2004-12-10       Impact factor: 2.474

9.  Speech target modulates speaking induced suppression in auditory cortex.

Authors:  Maria I Ventura; Srikantan S Nagarajan; John F Houde
Journal:  BMC Neurosci       Date:  2009-06-13       Impact factor: 3.288

10.  Modeling the developmental patterns of auditory evoked magnetic fields in children.

Authors:  Rupesh Kotecha; Maria Pardos; Yingying Wang; Ting Wu; Paul Horn; David Brown; Douglas Rose; Ton deGrauw; Jing Xiang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-03-11       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  29 in total

1.  EEG Mu (µ) rhythm spectra and oscillatory activity differentiate stuttering from non-stuttering adults.

Authors:  Tim Saltuklaroglu; Ashley W Harkrider; David Thornton; David Jenson; Tiffani Kittilstved
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2017-04-09       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  White matter tractography of the neural network for speech-motor control in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ehsan Misaghi; Zhaoran Zhang; Vincent L Gracco; Luc F De Nil; Deryk S Beal
Journal:  Neurosci Lett       Date:  2018-01-05       Impact factor: 3.046

3.  Functional and Neuroanatomical Bases of Developmental Stuttering: Current Insights.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Emily O Garnett; Andrew Etchell; Ho Ming Chow
Journal:  Neuroscientist       Date:  2018-09-28       Impact factor: 7.519

4.  Dissociations among linguistic, cognitive, and auditory-motor neuroanatomical domains in children who stutter.

Authors:  Ai Leen Choo; Evamarie Burnham; Kristin Hicks; Soo-Eun Chang
Journal:  J Commun Disord       Date:  2016-03-15       Impact factor: 2.288

5.  Sensory-motor networks involved in speech production and motor control: an fMRI study.

Authors:  Roozbeh Behroozmand; Rachel Shebek; Daniel R Hansen; Hiroyuki Oya; Donald A Robin; Matthew A Howard; Jeremy D W Greenlee
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2015-01-24       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Anomalous network architecture of the resting brain in children who stutter.

Authors:  Soo-Eun Chang; Michael Angstadt; Ho Ming Chow; Andrew C Etchell; Emily O Garnett; Ai Leen Choo; Daniel Kessler; Robert C Welsh; Chandra Sripada
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2017-01-25       Impact factor: 2.538

7.  Cortical activity during cued picture naming predicts individual differences in stuttering frequency.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Mock; Anne L Foundas; Edward J Golob
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 3.708

8.  Impaired timing adjustments in response to time-varying auditory perturbation during connected speech production in persons who stutter.

Authors:  Shanqing Cai; Deryk S Beal; Satrajit S Ghosh; Frank H Guenther; Joseph S Perkell
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2014-01-31       Impact factor: 2.381

9.  Past tense marking in the spontaneous speech of preschool children who do and do not stutter.

Authors:  Jessica Bauman; Nancy E Hall; Stacy A Wagovich; Christine M Weber-Fox; Nan Bernstein Ratner
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2012-04-26       Impact factor: 2.538

10.  Preschool speech articulation and nonword repetition abilities may help predict eventual recovery or persistence of stuttering.

Authors:  Caroline Spencer; Christine Weber-Fox
Journal:  J Fluency Disord       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 2.538

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.