Literature DB >> 19194703

Pre-clinical PET/MR: technological advances and new perspectives in biomedical research.

Hans F Wehrl1, Martin S Judenhofer, Stefan Wiehr, Bernd J Pichler.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Combined PET/MRI allows for multi-parametric imaging and reveals one or more functional processes simultaneously along with high-resolution morphology. Especially in small-animal research, where high soft tissue contrast is required, and the scan time as well as radiation dose are critical factors, the combination of PET and MRI would be beneficial compared with PET/CT. DEVELOPMENT: In the mid-1990's, several research groups used different approaches to integrate PET detectors into high-field MRI. First, systems were based on optical fibres guiding the scintillation light to the PMT's, which reside outside the fringe magnetic field. Recent advances in gamma ray detector technology, which were initiated mainly by the advent of avalanche photodiodes (APD's) as well as the routine availability of fast scintillation materials like lutetium oxyorthosilicate (LSO), paved the way towards the development of fully magnetic-field-insensitive high-performance PET detectors. TECHNOLOGY: Current animal PET/MR technologies are reviewed and pitfalls when engineering a full integration of a PET and a high-field MRI are discussed. Compact PET detectors can be integrated in small-bore, high-field MRI tomographs. Detailed performance evaluations have shown that the mutual interference between the two imaging systems could be minimized. The performance of all major MR applications, ranging from T1- or T2-weighted imaging up to echo-planar imaging (EPI) for functional MRI (fMRI) or magnetic resonance spectroscopy (MRS), could be maintained, even when the PET insert was built into the MRI and acquiring PET data simultaneously. Similarly, the PET system performance was not influenced by the static magnetic field or applied MRI sequences. APPLICATIONS: Initial biomedical research applications range from the combination of functional information from PET with the anatomical information from the MRI to multi-functional imaging combining metabollic PET and MRI data. DISCUSSION: Compared to other multi-modality approaches PET/MR offers a multitude of complementary function and anatomical information. The ability to obtain simultaneous PET and MRI data with this new imaging modality could have tremendous impact on small animal imaging research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194703     DOI: 10.1007/s00259-009-1078-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging        ISSN: 1619-7070            Impact factor:   9.236


  79 in total

Review 1.  Physiology of functional magnetic resonance imaging: energetics and function.

Authors:  Ikuhiro Kida; Fahmeed Hyder
Journal:  Methods Mol Med       Date:  2006

Review 2.  Report on a multicenter fMRI quality assurance protocol.

Authors:  Lee Friedman; Gary H Glover
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 4.813

3.  Performance test of an LSO-APD detector in a 7-T MRI scanner for simultaneous PET/MRI.

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Martin S Judenhofer; Ciprian Catana; Jeffrey H Walton; Manfred Kneilling; Robert E Nutt; Stefan B Siegel; Claus D Claussen; Simon R Cherry
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 4.  Screening for cancer with PET and PET/CT: potential and limitations.

Authors:  Heiko Schöder; Mithat Gönen
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 10.057

Review 5.  Positron emission tomography/magnetic resonance imaging: the next generation of multimodality imaging?

Authors:  Bernd J Pichler; Hans F Wehrl; Armin Kolb; Martin S Judenhofer
Journal:  Semin Nucl Med       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 4.446

6.  The design of an animal PET: flexible geometry for achieving optimal spatial resolution or high sensitivity.

Authors:  S Weber; A Terstegge; H Herzog; R Reinartz; P Reinhart; F Rongen; H W Müller-Gärtner; H Halling
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 7.  Imaging hypoxia and angiogenesis in tumors.

Authors:  Joseph G Rajendran; Kenneth A Krohn
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Detecting tumor response to treatment using hyperpolarized 13C magnetic resonance imaging and spectroscopy.

Authors:  Sam E Day; Mikko I Kettunen; Ferdia A Gallagher; De-En Hu; Mathilde Lerche; Jan Wolber; Klaes Golman; Jan Henrik Ardenkjaer-Larsen; Kevin M Brindle
Journal:  Nat Med       Date:  2007-10-28       Impact factor: 53.440

Review 9.  An integrated MR/PET system: prospective applications.

Authors:  Heinz-Peter Schlemmer; Bernd J Pichler; Robert Krieg; Wolf-Dieter Heiss
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-11

10.  Cerebral blood flow measurement using fMRI and PET: a cross-validation study.

Authors:  Jean J Chen; Marguerite Wieckowska; Ernst Meyer; G Bruce Pike
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2008
View more
  64 in total

Review 1.  Targeted probes for cardiovascular MRI.

Authors:  Ritika Uppal; Peter Caravan
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 2.  Molecular brain imaging in the multimodality era.

Authors:  Julie C Price
Journal:  J Cereb Blood Flow Metab       Date:  2012-03-21       Impact factor: 6.200

3.  Assessment of MR compatibility of a PET insert developed for simultaneous multiparametric PET/MR imaging on an animal system operating at 7 T.

Authors:  Hans F Wehrl; Martin S Judenhofer; Axel Thielscher; Petros Martirosian; Fritz Schick; Bernd J Pichler
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2011-01       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  [Functional and molecular imaging of breast tumors].

Authors:  K Pinker; P Brader; G Karanikas; K El-Rabadi; W Bogner; S Gruber; M Reisegger; S Trattnig; T H Helbich
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2010-11       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Monitoring response to imatinib using MRI signals in aggressive fibromatosis.

Authors:  Alexander Walter Sauter; Joerg T Hartmann; Marius S Horger
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2010-11-04       Impact factor: 9.236

6.  Evaluation of the PET component of simultaneous [(18)F]choline PET/MRI in prostate cancer: comparison with [(18)F]choline PET/CT.

Authors:  Axel Wetter; Christine Lipponer; Felix Nensa; Philipp Heusch; Herbert Rübben; Jens-Christian Altenbernd; Thomas Schlosser; Andreas Bockisch; Thorsten Pöppel; Thomas Lauenstein; James Nagarajah
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2013-10-02       Impact factor: 9.236

7.  Analog electro-optical readout of SiPMs achieves fast timing required for time-of-flight PET/MR.

Authors:  M F Bieniosek; C S Levin
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2015-04-23       Impact factor: 3.609

8.  Molecular Imaging in Breast Cancer - Potential Future Aspects.

Authors:  Katja Pinker; Wolfgang Bogner; Stephan Gruber; Peter Brader; Siegfried Trattnig; Georgios Karanikas; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  Breast Care (Basel)       Date:  2011-04-29       Impact factor: 2.860

Review 9.  Imaging pediatric bone sarcomas.

Authors:  Sue C Kaste
Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am       Date:  2011-06-16       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 10.  Positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging: technical review.

Authors:  Raymond F Muzic; Frank P DiFilippo
Journal:  Semin Roentgenol       Date:  2014-10-18       Impact factor: 0.800

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.