Literature DB >> 19194296

Sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences in young children with normal hearing.

Lieselot Van Deun1, Astrid van Wieringen, Tim Van den Bogaert, Fanny Scherf, F Erwin Offeciers, Paul H Van de Heyning, Christian Desloovere, Ingeborg J Dhooge, Naïma Deggouj, Leo De Raeve, Jan Wouters.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: In this study, procedures for measuring sound localization, sound lateralization, and binaural masking level differences (BMLDs) in young children were developed. Sensitivity for these tasks was assessed in large groups of children between 4 and 9 yr of age to investigate potential developmental trends.
DESIGN: Sound localization was measured in the sound field, with a broadband bell-ring presented from one of nine loudspeakers positioned in the frontal horizontal field. A group of 33 children between 4 and 6 yr of age and 5 adults took part in this experiment. Sound lateralization based on interaural time differences was measured with headphones in 49 children between 4 and 9 yr of age and 10 adults. A low-frequency stimulus containing harmonics 2 to 5 from a click train with a rate of 160 Hz was used. In the BMLD test, the same filtered click train was presented diotically or dichotically (phase reversed or time delayed) in a broadband (200 to 1000 Hz) frozen noise to 23 children between 4 and 6 yr of age and 10 adults. For comparison with literature, additional measurements with a 500-Hz sinusoid were administered to adults. All tasks were adapted to the interest and attention span of young children.
RESULTS: Children of 5 yr of age did not perform significantly different from adults on the sound localization task, but mean absolute errors were larger for the 4-yr-olds. Also on the BMLD task, 5-yr-old children performed at the adult level, whereas the 4-yr-old children obtained significantly less binaural unmasking compared with the adults. Concerning sound lateralization, a small but significant difference between adults and children existed, but no age effects were apparent in the 4- to 9-yr-old group. Overall, the variation was relatively large in the 4-yr-old group, with some of the children performing at adult level, in all three tasks.
CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study show that the modified procedures are suitable for testing children from the age of 4 to 5 yr. Furthermore, it seems that binaural hearing capacities of the 5-yr-olds are similar to those of adults. Several observations led to the hypothesis that the observed age differences between 4-yr-olds and older subjects on localization and BMLD or between those 4- to 9-yr old and adults on lateralization, were attributable to both a development in binaural hearing and to nonauditory factors, such as task comprehension, attention, and testing conditions. It is possible that the developmental process is more obvious and prolonged in other aspects of binaural hearing, which require more dynamic or more central processing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19194296     DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0b013e318194256b

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ear Hear        ISSN: 0196-0202            Impact factor:   3.570


  25 in total

1.  Spatial release from masking in children with normal hearing and with bilateral cochlear implants: effect of interferer asymmetry.

Authors:  Sara M Misurelli; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 1.840

Review 2.  Development of the auditory system.

Authors:  Ruth Litovsky
Journal:  Handb Clin Neurol       Date:  2015

3.  Review of recent work on spatial hearing skills in children with bilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Cochlear Implants Int       Date:  2011-05

4.  Simulation study of power and sample size for repeated measures with multinomial outcomes: an application to sound direction identification experiments (SDIE).

Authors:  Dingfeng Jiang; Jacob J Oleson
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  2011-07-12       Impact factor: 2.373

5.  Binaural masking level differences in actual and simulated bilateral cochlear implant listeners.

Authors:  Thomas Lu; Ruth Litovsky; Fan-Gang Zeng
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-03       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Binaural hearing in children using Gaussian enveloped and transposed tones.

Authors:  Erica Ehlers; Alan Kan; Matthew B Winn; Corey Stoelb; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Age-related hearing loss and ear morphology affect vertical but not horizontal sound-localization performance.

Authors:  Rik J Otte; Martijn J H Agterberg; Marc M Van Wanrooij; Ad F M Snik; A John Van Opstal
Journal:  J Assoc Res Otolaryngol       Date:  2013-01-15

8.  Sound localization skills in children who use bilateral cochlear implants and in children with normal acoustic hearing.

Authors:  Tina M Grieco-Calub; Ruth Y Litovsky
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.570

9.  Hearing Aid Uptake in Children with Unilateral Microtia and Canal Atresia: A Comparison between a Tertiary Center and Peripheral Centers.

Authors:  Todd Kanzara; Alasdair Ford; Elizabeth Fleming; Su De
Journal:  J Int Adv Otol       Date:  2020-04       Impact factor: 1.017

10.  Difference in precedence effect between children and adults signifies development of sound localization abilities in complex listening tasks.

Authors:  Ruth Y Litovsky; Shelly P Godar
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.