Todd Kanzara1, Alasdair Ford2, Elizabeth Fleming2, Su De2. 1. Department of Otolaryngology, Arrowe Park Hospital, Birkenhead, United Kingdom. 2. Department of Otolaryngology, Alder Hey Children's Hospital, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVES: To review the trialing and uptake of hearing aids in children with unilateral microtia or canal atresia, known collectively as congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss (CUCHL), observed in a tertiary hospital and local peripheral services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records for patients with CUCHL was conducted using data from a shared audiology database at a tertiary children's hospital. RESULTS: We identified 45 patients with CUCHL and excluded seven of them due to missing data. Of the 38 patients, 16 (16/38, 42%) did not have any subjective hearing complaints. Furthermore, 32% (12/38) of patients attended audiology at a tertiary centre and 83% (10/12) from this group trialled a hearing aid. In comparison, 46% (12/46) whose audiology care was delivered peripherally trialled aiding. Of the patients from the tertiary center, 58% (7/12) are still using a hearing aid compared to 27% (7/26) of patients from peripheral centers. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that patients with CUCHL are more likely to try hearing aids and continue using them if their audiology care is in a tertiary center. Allowing for a small sample size, this may indicate a health inequality. Agreeing on minimum standards for the management of patients with CUCHL or managing them in a designated center could increase consistency.
OBJECTIVES: To review the trialing and uptake of hearing aids in children with unilateral microtia or canal atresia, known collectively as congenital unilateral conductive hearing loss (CUCHL), observed in a tertiary hospital and local peripheral services. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of medical records for patients with CUCHL was conducted using data from a shared audiology database at a tertiary children's hospital. RESULTS: We identified 45 patients with CUCHL and excluded seven of them due to missing data. Of the 38 patients, 16 (16/38, 42%) did not have any subjective hearing complaints. Furthermore, 32% (12/38) of patients attended audiology at a tertiary centre and 83% (10/12) from this group trialled a hearing aid. In comparison, 46% (12/46) whose audiology care was delivered peripherally trialled aiding. Of the patients from the tertiary center, 58% (7/12) are still using a hearing aid compared to 27% (7/26) of patients from peripheral centers. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows that patients with CUCHL are more likely to try hearing aids and continue using them if their audiology care is in a tertiary center. Allowing for a small sample size, this may indicate a health inequality. Agreeing on minimum standards for the management of patients with CUCHL or managing them in a designated center could increase consistency.
Authors: Kathleen R Billings; Hannan Qureshi; Christopher Gouveia; Colleen Ittner; Stephen R Hoff Journal: Laryngoscope Date: 2015-08-08 Impact factor: 3.325
Authors: Lieselot Van Deun; Astrid van Wieringen; Tim Van den Bogaert; Fanny Scherf; F Erwin Offeciers; Paul H Van de Heyning; Christian Desloovere; Ingeborg J Dhooge; Naïma Deggouj; Leo De Raeve; Jan Wouters Journal: Ear Hear Date: 2009-04 Impact factor: 3.570
Authors: Jacky F W Lo; Willis S S Tsang; Joannie Y K Yu; Osan Y M Ho; Peter K M Ku; Michael C F Tong Journal: Biomed Res Int Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 3.411