Literature DB >> 19193772

Intracellular responses of neurons in the mouse inferior colliculus to sinusoidal amplitude-modulated tones.

H-R Geis1, J G G Borst.   

Abstract

Changes in the temporal envelope are important defining features of natural acoustic signals. Many cells in the inferior colliculus (IC) respond preferentially to certain modulation frequencies, but how they accomplish this is not yet clear. We therefore made whole cell patch-clamp recordings in the IC of anesthetized mice while presenting sinusoidal amplitude-modulated (SAM) tones. The relation between the number of evoked spikes and modulation frequency was used to construct rate modulation transfer functions (rMTFs). We observed different types of rate tuning, including band-pass (16%), band-reject (13%), high-pass (6%), and low-pass (6%) tuning. In the high-pass rMTF neurons and some of the low-pass rMTF neurons, the tuning characteristics appeared to be already present in the inputs. In both band-pass and band-reject rMTF neurons, the nonlinear relation between membrane potential and spike probability ensured preferential spiking during only a small part of the modulation period. Band-pass rMTF neurons had rapidly rising excitatory postsynaptic potentials, allowing good phase-locking to brief tones and intermediate modulation frequencies. At low modulation frequencies, adaptation of their spike threshold contributed to the onset response. In contrast, band-reject rMTF neurons responded with small excitatory or inhibitory postsynaptic potentials to brief tones. In these cells, a power law could describe the supralinear relation between average membrane potential and spike rate. Differences in timing of synaptic input and presence or absence of spike adaptation therefore define band-pass and band-reject rate tuning to SAM tones in the mouse IC.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19193772     DOI: 10.1152/jn.90966.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  23 in total

1.  Counting on dis-inhibition: a circuit motif for interval counting and selectivity in the anuran auditory system.

Authors:  Richard Naud; Dave Houtman; Gary J Rose; André Longtin
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-09-02       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Spike timing precision changes with spike rate adaptation in the owl's auditory space map.

Authors:  Clifford H Keller; Terry T Takahashi
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Noise-gated encoding of slow inputs by auditory brain stem neurons with a low-threshold K+ current.

Authors:  Yan Gai; Brent Doiron; Vibhakar Kotak; John Rinzel
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-10-07       Impact factor: 2.714

Review 4.  Balance or imbalance: inhibitory circuits for direction selectivity in the auditory system.

Authors:  Cal F Rabang; Jeff Lin; Guangying K Wu
Journal:  Cell Mol Life Sci       Date:  2015-02-01       Impact factor: 9.261

5.  Proportional spike-timing precision and firing reliability underlie efficient temporal processing of periodicity and envelope shape cues.

Authors:  Y Zheng; M A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Constant RMS versus constant peak modulation for the perceptual equivalence of sinusoidal amplitude modulated signals.

Authors:  Oliver B Regele; Andrew S Koivuniemi; Kevin J Otto
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2013

7.  Asymmetric temporal interactions of sound-evoked excitatory and inhibitory inputs in the mouse auditory midbrain.

Authors:  Munenori Ono; Douglas L Oliver
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2014-06-20       Impact factor: 5.182

8.  Emergence of band-pass filtering through adaptive spiking in the owl's cochlear nucleus.

Authors:  Bertrand Fontaine; Katrina M MacLeod; Susan T Lubejko; Louisa J Steinberg; Christine Köppl; Jose L Peña
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2014-04-30       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Amplitude modulation transfer functions reveal opposing populations within both the inferior colliculus and medial geniculate body.

Authors:  Duck O Kim; Laurel Carney; Shigeyuki Kuwada
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2020-09-09       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Spectral and temporal modulation tradeoff in the inferior colliculus.

Authors:  Francisco A Rodríguez; Heather L Read; Monty A Escabí
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-12-16       Impact factor: 2.714

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.