Literature DB >> 19188889

Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.

R Squadrone1, C Gallozzi.   

Abstract

AIM: The first aim of this study was to assess how changes in the mechanical characteristics of the foot/shoe-ground interface affect spatio-temporal variables, ground pressure distribution, sagittal plane kinematics, and running economy in 8 experienced barefoot runners. The second aim was to assess if a special lightweight shoe (Vibram Fivefingers) was effective in mimic the experience of barefoot running.
METHODS: By using an instrumented treadmill, barefoot running, running with the Fivefingers, and running with standard running shoe were compared, analyzing a large numbers of consecutive steps. Foot/shoe-ground interface pressure distribution, lower limb kinematics, V.O(2) and heart rate data were simultaneously collected.
RESULTS: Compared to the standard shod condition when running barefoot the athletes landed in more plantarflexion at the ankle. This caused reduced impact forces and changes in stride kinematics. In particular, significantly shorter stride length and contact times and higher stride frequency were observed (P<0.05). Compared to standard shod condition, V.O(2) and peak impact forces were significantly lower with Fivefingers (P<0.05) and much closer to barefoot running. Lower limb kinematics with Fivefingers was similar to barefoot running with a foot position which was significantly more plantarflexed than in control shoe (P<0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: The data of this study support the assumption that changes in the foot-ground interface led to changes in running pattern in a group of experienced barefoot runners. The Fivefingers model seems to be effective in imitating the barefoot conditions while providing a small amount of protection.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19188889

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness        ISSN: 0022-4707            Impact factor:   1.637


  62 in total

1.  Effects of forefoot running on chronic exertional compartment syndrome: a case series.

Authors:  Angela R Diebal; Robert Gregory; Curtis Alitz; J Parry Gerber
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2011-12

2.  The Effect of Training in Minimalist Running Shoes on Running Economy.

Authors:  Sarah T Ridge; Tyler Standifird; Jessica Rivera; A Wayne Johnson; Ulrike Mitchell; Iain Hunter
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 2.988

3.  Barefoot running: does it prevent injuries?

Authors:  Kelly Murphy; Emily J Curry; Elizabeth G Matzkin
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  The biomechanical differences between barefoot and shod distance running: a systematic review and preliminary meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jonathan P L Hall; Christian Barton; Paul Remy Jones; Dylan Morrissey
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Lower extremity biomechanical relationships with different speeds in traditional, minimalist, and barefoot footwear.

Authors:  William Fredericks; Seth Swank; Madeline Teisberg; Bethany Hampton; Lance Ridpath; Jandy B Hanna
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 6.  The effect of footwear on running performance and running economy in distance runners.

Authors:  Joel T Fuller; Clint R Bellenger; Dominic Thewlis; Margarita D Tsiros; Jonathan D Buckley
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  Shoe drop has opposite influence on running pattern when running overground or on a treadmill.

Authors:  Nicolas Chambon; Nicolas Delattre; Nils Guéguen; Eric Berton; Guillaume Rao
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2014-12-11       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  The Biomechanics of Standing Start and Initial Acceleration: Reliability of the Key Determining Kinematics.

Authors:  Regan J Standing; Peter S Maulder
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 2.988

9.  Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

Authors:  P J Bishop; C J Clemente; R E Weems; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 4.118

10.  Changes in lower extremity movement and power absorption during forefoot striking and barefoot running.

Authors:  D S Blaise Williams; Douglas H Green; Brian Wurzinger
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2012-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.