Literature DB >> 28724627

Using step width to compare locomotor biomechanics between extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs and modern obligate bipeds.

P J Bishop1,2,3, C J Clemente4,5, R E Weems6,7, D F Graham2,3, L P Lamas8,9, J R Hutchinson8, J Rubenson10,11, R S Wilson5, S A Hocknull12,2,3, R S Barrett2,3, D G Lloyd2,3,11.   

Abstract

How extinct, non-avian theropod dinosaurs locomoted is a subject of considerable interest, as is the manner in which it evolved on the line leading to birds. Fossil footprints provide the most direct evidence for answering these questions. In this study, step width-the mediolateral (transverse) distance between successive footfalls-was investigated with respect to speed (stride length) in non-avian theropod trackways of Late Triassic age. Comparable kinematic data were also collected for humans and 11 species of ground-dwelling birds. Permutation tests of the slope on a plot of step width against stride length showed that step width decreased continuously with increasing speed in the extinct theropods (p < 0.001), as well as the five tallest bird species studied (p < 0.01). Humans, by contrast, showed an abrupt decrease in step width at the walk-run transition. In the modern bipeds, these patterns reflect the use of either a discontinuous locomotor repertoire, characterized by distinct gaits (humans), or a continuous locomotor repertoire, where walking smoothly transitions into running (birds). The non-avian theropods are consequently inferred to have had a continuous locomotor repertoire, possibly including grounded running. Thus, features that characterize avian terrestrial locomotion had begun to evolve early in theropod history.
© 2017 The Author(s).

Entities:  

Keywords:  birds; fossil footprints; locomotion; step width; theropods

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28724627      PMCID: PMC5550975          DOI: 10.1098/rsif.2017.0276

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J R Soc Interface        ISSN: 1742-5662            Impact factor:   4.118


  56 in total

1.  Tyrannosaurus was not a fast runner.

Authors:  John R Hutchinson; Mariano Garcia
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-02-28       Impact factor: 49.962

Review 2.  Bivariate line-fitting methods for allometry.

Authors:  David I Warton; Ian J Wright; Daniel S Falster; Mark Westoby
Journal:  Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc       Date:  2006-03-30

3.  Evidence for energy savings from aerial running in the Svalbard rock ptarmigan (Lagopus muta hyperborea).

Authors:  R L Nudds; L P Folkow; J J Lees; P G Tickle; K-A Stokkan; J R Codd
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2011-02-02       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  Biomechanics of overground vs. treadmill walking in healthy individuals.

Authors:  Song Joo Lee; Joseph Hidler
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2007-11-29

5.  Estimating dinosaur maximum running speeds using evolutionary robotics.

Authors:  William Irvin Sellers; Phillip Lars Manning
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2007-11-07       Impact factor: 5.349

6.  Ground reaction forces and center of mass mechanics of bipedal capuchin monkeys: implications for the evolution of human bipedalism.

Authors:  Brigitte Demes; Matthew C O'Neill
Journal:  Am J Phys Anthropol       Date:  2012-11-02       Impact factor: 2.868

7.  Dinosaur locomotion from a new trackway.

Authors:  Julia J Day; David B Norman; Paul Upchurch; H Philip Powell
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 49.962

8.  Determinants of the gait transition speed during human locomotion: kinematic factors.

Authors:  A Hreljac
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Walking and running in the red-legged running frog, Kassina maculata.

Authors:  A N Ahn; E Furrow; A A Biewener
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.312

10.  Two independent contributions to step variability during over-ground human walking.

Authors:  Steven H Collins; Arthur D Kuo
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-08-28       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  6 in total

1.  The influence of speed and size on avian terrestrial locomotor biomechanics: Predicting locomotion in extinct theropod dinosaurs.

Authors:  P J Bishop; D F Graham; L P Lamas; J R Hutchinson; J Rubenson; J A Hancock; R S Wilson; S A Hocknull; R S Barrett; D G Lloyd; C J Clemente
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-02-21       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part II-a new approach to inferring posture and locomotor biomechanics in extinct tetrapod vertebrates.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

3.  Cancellous bone and theropod dinosaur locomotion. Part III-Inferring posture and locomotor biomechanics in extinct theropods, and its evolution on the line to birds.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Scott A Hocknull; Christofer J Clemente; John R Hutchinson; Andrew A Farke; Rod S Barrett; David G Lloyd
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  The evolution of pelvic limb muscle moment arms in bird-line archosaurs.

Authors:  V R Allen; B M Kilbourne; J R Hutchinson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-03-19       Impact factor: 14.136

5.  Fast-running theropods tracks from the Early Cretaceous of La Rioja, Spain.

Authors:  Pablo Navarro-Lorbés; Javier Ruiz; Ignacio Díaz-Martínez; Erik Isasmendi; Patxi Sáez-Benito; Luis Viera; Xabier Pereda-Suberbiola; Angélica Torices
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-09       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Predictive simulations of running gait reveal a critical dynamic role for the tail in bipedal dinosaur locomotion.

Authors:  Peter J Bishop; Antoine Falisse; Friedl De Groote; John R Hutchinson
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2021-09-22       Impact factor: 14.136

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.