Literature DB >> 26336352

The Effect of Training in Minimalist Running Shoes on Running Economy.

Sarah T Ridge1, Tyler Standifird2, Jessica Rivera1, A Wayne Johnson1, Ulrike Mitchell1, Iain Hunter1.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of minimalist running shoes on oxygen uptake during running before and after a 10-week transition from traditional to minimalist running shoes. Twenty-five recreational runners (no previous experience in minimalist running shoes) participated in submaximal VO2 testing at a self-selected pace while wearing traditional and minimalist running shoes. Ten of the 25 runners gradually transitioned to minimalist running shoes over 10 weeks (experimental group), while the other 15 maintained their typical training regimen (control group). All participants repeated submaximal VO2 testing at the end of 10 weeks. Testing included a 3 minute warm-up, 3 minutes of running in the first pair of shoes, and 3 minutes of running in the second pair of shoes. Shoe order was randomized. Average oxygen uptake was calculated during the last minute of running in each condition. The average change from pre- to post-training for the control group during testing in traditional and minimalist shoes was an improvement of 3.1 ± 15.2% and 2.8 ± 16.2%, respectively. The average change from pre- to post-training for the experimental group during testing in traditional and minimalist shoes was an improvement of 8.4 ± 7.2% and 10.4 ± 6.9%, respectively. Data were analyzed using a 2-way repeated measures ANOVA. There were no significant interaction effects, but the overall improvement in running economy across time (6.15%) was significant (p = 0.015). Running in minimalist running shoes improves running economy in experienced, traditionally shod runners, but not significantly more than when running in traditional running shoes. Improvement in running economy in both groups, regardless of shoe type, may have been due to compliance with training over the 10-week study period and/or familiarity with testing procedures. Key pointsRunning in minimalist footwear did not result in a change in running economy compared to running in traditional footwear prior to 10 weeks of training.Both groups (control and experimental) showed an improvement in running economy in both types of shoes after 10 weeks of training.After transitioning to minimalist running shoes, running economy was not significantly different while running in traditional or minimalist footwear.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Footwear; oxygen consumption; training

Year:  2015        PMID: 26336352      PMCID: PMC4541130     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  13 in total

1.  Effects of footwear and strike type on running economy.

Authors:  Daniel P Perl; Adam I Daoud; Daniel E Lieberman
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  Barefoot-shod running differences: shoe or mass effect?

Authors:  C Divert; G Mornieux; P Freychat; L Baly; F Mayer; A Belli
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2007-11-16       Impact factor: 3.118

3.  Foot strike patterns of runners at the 15-km point during an elite-level half marathon.

Authors:  Hiroshi Hasegawa; Takeshi Yamauchi; William J Kraemer
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Biomechanical and physiological comparison of barefoot and two shod conditions in experienced barefoot runners.

Authors:  R Squadrone; C Gallozzi
Journal:  J Sports Med Phys Fitness       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 1.637

5.  Four-week habituation to simulated barefoot running improves running economy when compared with shod running.

Authors:  J P Warne; G D Warrington
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2012-12-17       Impact factor: 4.221

6.  Effect of slope and footwear on running economy and kinematics.

Authors:  T Lussiana; N Fabre; K Hébert-Losier; L Mourot
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2013-02-26       Impact factor: 4.221

7.  Mechanical and physiological examination of barefoot and shod conditions in female runners.

Authors:  S Paulson; W A Braun
Journal:  Int J Sports Med       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 3.118

8.  Are there differences in running economy at different velocities for well-trained distance runners?

Authors:  Jan Helgerud; Oyvind Støren; Jan Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-12-19       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Maximal oxygen uptake, anaerobic threshold and running economy in women and men with similar performances level in marathons.

Authors:  J Helgerud
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol       Date:  1994

10.  Is the foot striking pattern more important than barefoot or shod conditions in running?

Authors:  Yo Shih; Kuan-Lun Lin; Tzyy-Yuang Shiang
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2013-03-16       Impact factor: 2.840

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Systematic Review of the Role of Footwear Constructions in Running Biomechanics: Implications for Running-Related Injury and Performance.

Authors:  Xiaole Sun; Wing-Kai Lam; Xini Zhang; Junqing Wang; Weijie Fu
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2020-02-24       Impact factor: 2.988

Review 2.  Transitioning to Minimal Footwear: a Systematic Review of Methods and Future Clinical Recommendations.

Authors:  Joe P Warne; Allison H Gruber
Journal:  Sports Med Open       Date:  2017-09-15

3.  Small Step Frequency Changes Due to Footwear Condition Have No Effect on Running Economy.

Authors:  Joe Warne; Kieran Andrew Moran; Giles D Warrington
Journal:  Sports Med Int Open       Date:  2018-05-16
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.