PURPOSE: BRCAPRO, a BRCA mutation carrier prediction model, was developed on the basis of studies in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish and European ancestry. We evaluated the performance of the BRCAPRO model among clinic-based minority families. We also assessed the clinical utility of mutation status of probands (the first individual tested in a family) in the recommendation of BRCA mutation testing for other at-risk family members. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 292 minority families with at least one member who was tested for BRCA mutations were identified through the Breast Cancer Family Registry and the University of Chicago. Using the BRCAPRO model, the predicted likelihood of carrying BRCA mutations was generated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 104 African American, 130 Hispanic, 37 Asian-American, and 21 other minority families. The AUC was 0.748 (95% CI, 0.672 to 0.823) for all minorities combined. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend for BRCAPRO to perform better in Hispanic families than in other minority families. After taking into account the mutation status of probands, BRCAPRO performance in additional tested family members was improved: the AUC increased from 0.760 to 0.902. CONCLUSION: The findings support the use of BRCAPRO in pretest BRCA mutation prediction among minority families in clinical settings, but there is room for improvement in ethnic groups other than Hispanics. Knowledge of the mutation status of the proband provides additional predictive value, which may guide genetic counselors in recommending BRCA testing of additional relatives when a proband has tested negative.
PURPOSE:BRCAPRO, a BRCA mutation carrier prediction model, was developed on the basis of studies in individuals of Ashkenazi Jewish and European ancestry. We evaluated the performance of the BRCAPRO model among clinic-based minority families. We also assessed the clinical utility of mutation status of probands (the first individual tested in a family) in the recommendation of BRCA mutation testing for other at-risk family members. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 292 minority families with at least one member who was tested for BRCA mutations were identified through the Breast Cancer Family Registry and the University of Chicago. Using the BRCAPRO model, the predicted likelihood of carrying BRCA mutations was generated. Area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs) were calculated. RESULTS: There were 104 African American, 130 Hispanic, 37 Asian-American, and 21 other minority families. The AUC was 0.748 (95% CI, 0.672 to 0.823) for all minorities combined. There was a statistically nonsignificant trend for BRCAPRO to perform better in Hispanic families than in other minority families. After taking into account the mutation status of probands, BRCAPRO performance in additional tested family members was improved: the AUC increased from 0.760 to 0.902. CONCLUSION: The findings support the use of BRCAPRO in pretest BRCA mutation prediction among minority families in clinical settings, but there is room for improvement in ethnic groups other than Hispanics. Knowledge of the mutation status of the proband provides additional predictive value, which may guide genetic counselors in recommending BRCA testing of additional relatives when a proband has tested negative.
Authors: D G R Evans; D M Eccles; N Rahman; K Young; M Bulman; E Amir; A Shenton; A Howell; F Lalloo Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2004-06 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: F Marroni; P Aretini; E D'Andrea; M A Caligo; L Cortesi; A Viel; E Ricevuto; M Montagna; G Cipollini; S Ferrari; M Santarosa; R Bisegna; J E Bailey-Wilson; G Bevilacqua; G Parmigiani; S Presciuttini Journal: J Med Genet Date: 2004-04 Impact factor: 6.318
Authors: Carlos H Barcenas; G M Monawar Hosain; Banu Arun; Jihong Zong; Xiaojun Zhou; Jianfang Chen; Jill M Cortada; Gordon B Mills; Gail E Tomlinson; Alexander R Miller; Louise C Strong; Christopher I Amos Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2006-01-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: D Ford; D F Easton; M Stratton; S Narod; D Goldgar; P Devilee; D T Bishop; B Weber; G Lenoir; J Chang-Claude; H Sobol; M D Teare; J Struewing; A Arason; S Scherneck; J Peto; T R Rebbeck; P Tonin; S Neuhausen; R Barkardottir; J Eyfjord; H Lynch; B A Ponder; S A Gayther; M Zelada-Hedman Journal: Am J Hum Genet Date: 1998-03 Impact factor: 11.025
Authors: C Apicella; J G Dowty; G S Dite; M A Jenkins; R T Senie; M B Daly; I L Andrulis; E M John; S S Buys; F P Li; G Glendon; W Chung; H Ozcelik; A Miron; K Kotar; M C Southey; W D Foulkes; J L Hopper Journal: Clin Genet Date: 2007-08 Impact factor: 4.438
Authors: Antonis C Antoniou; Francine Durocher; Paula Smith; Jacques Simard; Douglas F Easton Journal: Breast Cancer Res Date: 2005-12-12 Impact factor: 6.466
Authors: Zahi I Mitri; Michelle Jackson; Carolyn Garby; Juhee Song; Sharon H Giordano; Gabriel N Hortobágyi; Claire N Singletary; S Shahrukh Hashmi; Banu K Arun; Jennifer K Litton Journal: Oncologist Date: 2015-05-06
Authors: Jeffrey N Weitzel; Jessica Clague; Arelis Martir-Negron; Raquel Ogaz; Josef Herzog; Charité Ricker; Chelsy Jungbluth; Cheryl Cina; Paul Duncan; Gary Unzeitig; J Salvador Saldivar; Mary Beattie; Nancy Feldman; Sharon Sand; Danielle Port; Deborah I Barragan; Esther M John; Susan L Neuhausen; Garrett P Larson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-12-10 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini; Yonglan Zheng; Hiroyuki Abe; Kristen Whitaker; Toshio F Yoshimatsu; Tom Walsh; David Schacht; Kirti Kulkarni; Deepa Sheth; Marion S Verp; Angela R Bradbury; Jane Churpek; Elias Obeid; Jeffrey Mueller; Galina Khramtsova; Fang Liu; Akila Raoul; Hongyuan Cao; Iris L Romero; Susan Hong; Robert Livingston; Nora Jaskowiak; Xiaoming Wang; Marcio Debiasi; Colin C Pritchard; Mary-Claire King; Gregory Karczmar; Gillian M Newstead; Dezheng Huo; Olufunmilayo I Olopade Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-08-28 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Darren Mays; McKane E Sharff; Tiffani A DeMarco; Bernice Williams; Beth Beck; Vanessa B Sheppard; Beth N Peshkin; Jennifer Eng-Wong; Kenneth P Tercyak Journal: Fam Cancer Date: 2012-09 Impact factor: 2.375
Authors: L Malorni; P B Shetty; C De Angelis; S Hilsenbeck; M F Rimawi; R Elledge; C K Osborne; S De Placido; G Arpino Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2012-11-04 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: Huma Q Rana; Sarah R Cochrane; Elaine Hiller; Ruth N Akindele; Callie M Nibecker; Ludmila A Svoboda; Angel M Cronin; Judy E Garber; Christopher S Lathan Journal: J Community Genet Date: 2017-11-18