Literature DB >> 25948675

BRCAPRO 6.0 Model Validation in Male Patients Presenting for BRCA Testing.

Zahi I Mitri1, Michelle Jackson1, Carolyn Garby1, Juhee Song1, Sharon H Giordano1, Gabriel N Hortobágyi1, Claire N Singletary1, S Shahrukh Hashmi1, Banu K Arun1, Jennifer K Litton2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: BRCAPRO is a risk assessment model to estimate the risk of carrying a BRCA mutation. BRCA mutation carriers are at higher risk of developing breast, ovarian, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. BRCAPRO was developed for women and found to be superior to other risk assessment models. The present study evaluated the validity of BRCAPRO at predicting the risk of male patients carrying a BRCA mutation. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 146 men who presented for genetic counseling and testing from February1997 to September 2011, and their test results were included in the present study. BRCAPRO risk assessment for all patients was calculated using the BRCAPRO clinical CancerGene assessment software.
RESULTS: The mean age at presentation was 57 years. Of the 146 patients, 48 had breast cancer, 18 had pancreatic cancer, 39 had prostate cancer, 27 had other primary cancers, and 37 had no cancer. Fifty patients (34%) tested positive for a BRCA mutation (22 BRCA1, 27 BRCA2, and 1 BRCA1 and BRCA2). The mean BRCAPRO score for all patients was 24.96%. The BRCAPRO score was significantly higher for patients who tested positive for a BRCA mutation (46.19% vs. 13.9%, p < .01). The area under the receiver operating characteristics curve was 0.83 for all patients for the BRCAPRO score to predict the risk of carrying a BRCA mutation. At a cutoff point of 30.02%, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 0.74, 0.81, 0.67, and 0.86, respectively.
CONCLUSION: BRCAPRO appears to be a valid risk assessment tool for determining the risk of carrying a BRCA mutation in men. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Men carrying genetic mutations in the BRCA gene have a greater risk than the general population of developing certain types of cancer, including breast, pancreatic, and prostate cancer. BRCAPRO is a risk assessment model that predicts the risk of carrying a BRCA mutation. The present study aimed at validating BRCAPRO for use with men seen for genetic counseling, whether affected by cancer or not. The data available for 146 patients revealed that BRCAPRO was effective at identifying patients at risk of BRCA mutation. These findings could help in identifying a subset of high-risk patients who should proceed to genetic testing. ©AlphaMed Press.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BRCA; BRCAPRO; Cancer genetics; Genetic counseling; Male breast cancer; Risk models

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25948675      PMCID: PMC4571779          DOI: 10.1634/theoncologist.2014-0425

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncologist        ISSN: 1083-7159


  22 in total

1.  Male breast cancer: management and follow-up recommendations.

Authors:  John V Kiluk; Marie Catherine Lee; Catherine K Park; Tammi Meade; Susan Minton; Eleanor Harris; Jongphil Kim; Christine Laronga
Journal:  Breast J       Date:  2011-08-29       Impact factor: 2.431

2.  The carrier frequency of the BRCA2 6174delT mutation among Ashkenazi Jewish individuals is approximately 1%.

Authors:  C Oddoux; J P Struewing; C M Clayton; S Neuhausen; L C Brody; M Kaback; B Haas; L Norton; P Borgen; S Jhanwar; D Goldgar; H Ostrer; K Offit
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 38.330

3.  Statement of the American Society of Clinical Oncology: genetic testing for cancer susceptibility, Adopted on February 20, 1996.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  The risk of cancer associated with specific mutations of BRCA1 and BRCA2 among Ashkenazi Jews.

Authors:  J P Struewing; P Hartge; S Wacholder; S M Baker; M Berlin; M McAdams; M M Timmerman; L C Brody; M A Tucker
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1997-05-15       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 5.  Retrospective review of male breast cancer patients: analysis of tamoxifen-related side-effects.

Authors:  N Pemmaraju; M F Munsell; G N Hortobagyi; S H Giordano
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2011-11-15       Impact factor: 32.976

6.  BRCAPRO validation, sensitivity of genetic testing of BRCA1/BRCA2, and prevalence of other breast cancer susceptibility genes.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Edwin S Iversen; Daniel F Gudbjartsson; Elaine H Hiller; Judy E Garber; Beth N Peshkin; Caryn Lerman; Patrice Watson; Henry T Lynch; Susan G Hilsenbeck; Wendy S Rubinstein; Kevin S Hughes; Giovanni Parmigiani
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2002-06-01       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Pretest prediction of BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation by risk counselors and the computer model BRCAPRO.

Authors:  David M Euhus; Kristin C Smith; Linda Robinson; Amy Stucky; Olufunmilayo I Olopade; Shelly Cummings; Judy E Garber; Anu Chittenden; Gordon B Mills; Paula Rieger; Laura Esserman; Beth Crawford; Kevin S Hughes; Connie A Roche; Patricia A Ganz; Joyce Seldon; Carol J Fabian; Jennifer Klemp; Gail Tomlinson
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 13.506

8.  Ashkenazi Jewish population frequencies for common mutations in BRCA1 and BRCA2.

Authors:  B B Roa; A A Boyd; K Volcik; C S Richards
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 38.330

9.  Her-2/neu gene amplification and protein expression in primary male breast cancer.

Authors:  Christian Rudlowski; Nicolaus Friedrichs; Andree Faridi; Lazlo Füzesi; Roland Moll; Gunther Bastert; Werner Rath; Reinhard Büttner
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.872

10.  Male versus female breast cancers. A population-based comparative immunohistochemical analysis.

Authors:  D Muir; R Kanthan; S C Kanthan
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.534

View more
  4 in total

1.  Male Breast Cancer: A Study in Small Steps.

Authors:  Larissa A Korde
Journal:  Oncologist       Date:  2015-05-18

Review 2.  Male Breast Cancer: From Molecular Genetics to Clinical Management.

Authors:  Matilde Pensabene; Claudia Von Arx; Michelino De Laurentiis
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 3.  Optimal delivery of male breast cancer follow-up care: improving outcomes.

Authors:  Raina M Ferzoco; Kathryn J Ruddy
Journal:  Breast Cancer (Dove Med Press)       Date:  2015-11-23

4.  HOXB13 and other high penetrant genes for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Patrick G Pilie; Veda N Giri; Kathleen A Cooney
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2016 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.285

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.