Literature DB >> 30154229

Intensive Surveillance with Biannual Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Downstages Breast Cancer in BRCA1 Mutation Carriers.

Rodrigo Santa Cruz Guindalini1,2,3, Yonglan Zheng1, Hiroyuki Abe4, Kristen Whitaker1, Toshio F Yoshimatsu1, Tom Walsh5, David Schacht4, Kirti Kulkarni4, Deepa Sheth4, Marion S Verp1, Angela R Bradbury6, Jane Churpek1, Elias Obeid7, Jeffrey Mueller8, Galina Khramtsova1, Fang Liu1, Akila Raoul1, Hongyuan Cao9, Iris L Romero1,10, Susan Hong1,11, Robert Livingston12, Nora Jaskowiak13, Xiaoming Wang14, Marcio Debiasi15,16, Colin C Pritchard12, Mary-Claire King5, Gregory Karczmar17, Gillian M Newstead4, Dezheng Huo18, Olufunmilayo I Olopade19.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To establish a cohort of high-risk women undergoing intensive surveillance for breast cancer.Experimental Design: We performed dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI every 6 months in conjunction with annual mammography (MG). Eligible participants had a cumulative lifetime breast cancer risk ≥20% and/or tested positive for a pathogenic mutation in a known breast cancer susceptibility gene.
RESULTS: Between 2004 and 2016, we prospectively enrolled 295 women, including 157 mutation carriers (75 BRCA1, 61 BRCA2); participants' mean age at entry was 43.3 years. Seventeen cancers were later diagnosed: 4 ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and 13 early-stage invasive breast cancers. Fifteen cancers occurred in mutation carriers (11 BRCA1, 3 BRCA2, 1 CDH1). Median size of the invasive cancers was 0.61 cm. No patients had lymph node metastasis at time of diagnosis, and no interval invasive cancers occurred. The sensitivity of biannual MRI alone was 88.2% and annual MG plus biannual MRI was 94.1%. The cancer detection rate of biannual MRI alone was 0.7% per 100 screening episodes, which is similar to the cancer detection rate of 0.7% per 100 screening episodes for annual MG plus biannual MRI. The number of recalls and biopsies needed to detect one cancer by biannual MRI were 2.8 and 1.7 in BRCA1 carriers, 12.0 and 8.0 in BRCA2 carriers, and 11.7 and 5.0 in non-BRCA1/2 carriers, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Biannual MRI performed well for early detection of invasive breast cancer in genomically stratified high-risk women. No benefit was associated with annual MG screening plus biannual MRI screening.See related commentary by Kuhl and Schrading, p. 1693. ©2018 American Association for Cancer Research.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2018        PMID: 30154229      PMCID: PMC6395536          DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-18-0200

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Cancer Res        ISSN: 1078-0432            Impact factor:   12.531


  43 in total

1.  Prediction of BRCA Mutations Using the BRCAPRO Model in Clinic-Based African American, Hispanic, and Other Minority Families in the United States.

Authors:  Dezheng Huo; Ruby T Senie; Mary Daly; Saundra S Buys; Shelly Cummings; Jacqueline Ogutha; Kisha Hope; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Abbreviated breast magnetic resonance imaging (MRI): first postcontrast subtracted images and maximum-intensity projection-a novel approach to breast cancer screening with MRI.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Kevin Strobel; Hans H Schild; Ralf-Dieter Hilgers; Heribert B Bieling
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  Mammography, breast ultrasound, and magnetic resonance imaging for surveillance of women at high familial risk for breast cancer.

Authors:  Christiane K Kuhl; Simone Schrading; Claudia C Leutner; Nuschin Morakkabati-Spitz; Eva Wardelmann; Rolf Fimmers; Walther Kuhn; Hans H Schild
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2005-11-20       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  What is the recall rate of breast MRI when used for screening asymptomatic women at high risk?

Authors:  Ruth M L Warren; Linda Pointon; Rebecca Caines; Carmel Hayes; Deborah Thompson; Martin O Leach
Journal:  Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 2.546

5.  Effectiveness of alternating mammography and magnetic resonance imaging for screening women with deleterious BRCA mutations at high risk of breast cancer.

Authors:  Huong T Le-Petross; Gary J Whitman; Deanne P Atchley; Ying Yuan; Angelica Gutierrez-Barrera; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; Jennifer K Litton; Banu K Arun
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2011-03-01       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Triple-modality screening trial for familial breast cancer underlines the importance of magnetic resonance imaging and questions the role of mammography and ultrasound regardless of patient mutation status, age, and breast density.

Authors:  Christopher C Riedl; Nikolaus Luft; Clemens Bernhart; Michael Weber; Maria Bernathova; Muy-Kheng M Tea; Margaretha Rudas; Christian F Singer; Thomas H Helbich
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-23       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  Screening with magnetic resonance imaging and mammography of a UK population at high familial risk of breast cancer: a prospective multicentre cohort study (MARIBS).

Authors:  M O Leach; C R M Boggis; A K Dixon; D F Easton; R A Eeles; D G R Evans; F J Gilbert; I Griebsch; R J C Hoff; P Kessar; S R Lakhani; S M Moss; A Nerurkar; A R Padhani; L J Pointon; D Thompson; R M L Warren
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005 May 21-27       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 8.  Counselling framework for moderate-penetrance cancer-susceptibility mutations.

Authors:  Nadine Tung; Susan M Domchek; Zsofia Stadler; Katherine L Nathanson; Fergus Couch; Judy E Garber; Kenneth Offit; Mark E Robson
Journal:  Nat Rev Clin Oncol       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 66.675

9.  Rapid increase in breast magnetic resonance imaging use: trends from 2000 to 2011.

Authors:  Natasha K Stout; Larissa Nekhlyudov; Lingling Li; Elisabeth S Malin; Dennis Ross-Degnan; Diana S M Buist; Marjorie A Rosenberg; Marina Alfisher; Suzanne W Fletcher
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 21.873

10.  Contribution of mammography to MRI screening in BRCA mutation carriers by BRCA status and age: individual patient data meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xuan-Anh Phi; Sepideh Saadatmand; Geertruida H De Bock; Ellen Warner; Francesco Sardanelli; Martin O Leach; Christopher C Riedl; Isabelle Trop; Maartje J Hooning; Rodica Mandel; Filippo Santoro; Gek Kwan-Lim; Thomas H Helbich; Madeleine M A Tilanus-Linthorst; Edwin R van den Heuvel; Nehmat Houssami
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2016-02-23       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Breast Cancer Screening in High-Risk Women: Is MRI Alone Enough?

Authors:  Carolina Rossi Saccarelli; Almir G V Bitencourt; Elizabeth A Morris
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2020-02-01       Impact factor: 13.506

2.  Tumor Contrast Enhancement and Whole-Body Elimination of the Manganese-Based Magnetic Resonance Imaging Contrast Agent Mn-PyC3A.

Authors:  Derek J Erstad; Ian A Ramsay; Veronica Clavijo Jordan; Mozhdeh Sojoodi; Bryan C Fuchs; Kenneth K Tanabe; Peter Caravan; Eric M Gale
Journal:  Invest Radiol       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.016

3.  Updated Breast Cancer Surveillance Recommendations for Female Survivors of Childhood, Adolescent, and Young Adult Cancer From the International Guideline Harmonization Group.

Authors:  Renée L Mulder; Melissa M Hudson; Smita Bhatia; Wendy Landier; Gill Levitt; Louis S Constine; W Hamish Wallace; Flora E van Leeuwen; Cécile M Ronckers; Tara O Henderson; Chaya S Moskowitz; Danielle N Friedman; Andrea K Ng; Helen C Jenkinson; Charlotte Demoor-Goldschmidt; Roderick Skinner; Leontien C M Kremer; Kevin C Oeffinger
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Breast cancer surveillance for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers - is "early detection" early enough?

Authors:  Rinat Bernstein-Molho; Bella Kaufman; Merav A Ben David; Miri Sklair-Levy; Dana Madoursky Feldman; Dov Zippel; Yael Laitman; Eitan Friedman
Journal:  Breast       Date:  2019-11-06       Impact factor: 4.380

Review 5.  Contrast-enhanced MRI for breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Ritse M Mann; Christiane K Kuhl; Linda Moy
Journal:  J Magn Reson Imaging       Date:  2019-01-18       Impact factor: 4.813

Review 6.  A review on methods for diagnosis of breast cancer cells and tissues.

Authors:  Ziyu He; Zhu Chen; Miduo Tan; Sauli Elingarami; Yuan Liu; Taotao Li; Yan Deng; Nongyue He; Song Li; Juan Fu; Wen Li
Journal:  Cell Prolif       Date:  2020-06-12       Impact factor: 6.831

Review 7.  Recommendations for Advancing the Diagnosis and Management of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in Brazil.

Authors:  Maria Isabel Achatz; Maira Caleffi; Rodrigo Guindalini; Renato Moretti Marques; Angelica Nogueira-Rodrigues; Patricia Ashton-Prolla
Journal:  JCO Glob Oncol       Date:  2020-03

8.  Addressing health disparities in cancer with genomics.

Authors:  Onyinye D Balogun; Olufunmilayo I Olopade
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2021-10       Impact factor: 59.581

Review 9.  Surgical Management of Hereditary Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth R Berger; Mehra Golshan
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2021-08-31       Impact factor: 4.096

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.