PURPOSE: To determine the optimal dose of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab that can be safely administered in combination with a standard daily dose of erlotinib in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies who had failed standard chemotherapies received escalating doses of cetuximab without a loading dose (100, 200, 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly) in combination with a fixed dose of erlotinib (150 mg daily orally) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were treated, including 14 patients (64%) with non-small cell lung cancer. Twenty patients received combination treatment at the highest dose level for a median of 5.5 weeks (range, 1-31 weeks). One dose-limiting toxicity was observed: grade 3 skin rash. Overall, the most common adverse events (any grade, grade 3/4) were consistent with the safety profiles of the individual drugs: acneform rash (100%, 9%), diarrhea (77%, 5%), and hypomagnesemia (59%, 12%). Seven of 18 evaluable patients (38.9%) had stable disease lasting for a median of 16.6 weeks (range, 6.1-25.1 weeks). CONCLUSION: Dual EGFR inhibition with cetuximab and erlotinib is feasible; the observed toxicities were manageable and consistent with the safety profiles of the individual drugs. The recommended doses for phase II studies are 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for cetuximab and 150 mg daily orally for erlotinib.
PURPOSE: To determine the optimal dose of the antiepidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody cetuximab that can be safely administered in combination with a standard daily dose of erlotinib in patients with advanced solid malignancies. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with advanced solid malignancies who had failed standard chemotherapies received escalating doses of cetuximab without a loading dose (100, 200, 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly) in combination with a fixed dose of erlotinib (150 mg daily orally) until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were treated, including 14 patients (64%) with non-small cell lung cancer. Twenty patients received combination treatment at the highest dose level for a median of 5.5 weeks (range, 1-31 weeks). One dose-limiting toxicity was observed: grade 3 skin rash. Overall, the most common adverse events (any grade, grade 3/4) were consistent with the safety profiles of the individual drugs: acneform rash (100%, 9%), diarrhea (77%, 5%), and hypomagnesemia (59%, 12%). Seven of 18 evaluable patients (38.9%) had stable disease lasting for a median of 16.6 weeks (range, 6.1-25.1 weeks). CONCLUSION: Dual EGFR inhibition with cetuximab and erlotinib is feasible; the observed toxicities were manageable and consistent with the safety profiles of the individual drugs. The recommended doses for phase II studies are 250 mg/m(2) i.v. weekly for cetuximab and 150 mg daily orally for erlotinib.
Authors: José Baselga; José M Trigo; Jean Bourhis; Jacques Tortochaux; Hernán Cortés-Funes; Ricardo Hitt; Pere Gascón; Nadia Amellal; Andreas Harstrick; André Eckardt Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Roy S Herbst; Matthew Arquette; Dong M Shin; Karel Dicke; Everett E Vokes; Nozar Azarnia; Waun Ki Hong; Merrill S Kies Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2005-07-11 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Antoinette R Tan; Dirk F Moore; Manuel Hidalgo; James H Doroshow; Elizabeth A Poplin; Susan Goodin; David Mauro; Eric H Rubin Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2006-10-25 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Antonio Jimeno; Belen Rubio-Viqueira; Maria L Amador; Darin Oppenheimer; Nadia Bouraoud; Peter Kulesza; Valeria Sebastiani; Anirban Maitra; Manuel Hidalgo Journal: Cancer Res Date: 2005-04-15 Impact factor: 12.701
Authors: Pablo Matar; Federico Rojo; Raúl Cassia; Gema Moreno-Bueno; Serena Di Cosimo; José Tabernero; Marta Guzmán; Sonia Rodriguez; Joaquín Arribas; José Palacios; José Baselga Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2004-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Derek J Jonker; Chris J O'Callaghan; Christos S Karapetis; John R Zalcberg; Dongsheng Tu; Heather-Jane Au; Scott R Berry; Marianne Krahn; Timothy Price; R John Simes; Niall C Tebbutt; Guy van Hazel; Rafal Wierzbicki; Christiane Langer; Malcolm J Moore Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2007-11-15 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: R Rosell; G Robinet; A Szczesna; R Ramlau; M Constenla; B C Mennecier; W Pfeifer; K J O'Byrne; T Welte; R Kolb; R Pirker; A Chemaissani; M Perol; M R Ranson; P A Ellis; K Pilz; M Reck Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2007-10-17 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Charles A Butts; David Bodkin; Edward L Middleman; Craig W Englund; David Ellison; Yasmin Alam; Harvey Kreisman; Peter Graze; James Maher; Helen J Ross; Peter M Ellis; William McNulty; Edward Kaplan; Virginie Pautret; Martin R Weber; Frances A Shepherd Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2007-12-20 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: John F Deeken; Hongkun Wang; Deepa Subramaniam; Aiwu Ruth He; Jimmy Hwang; John L Marshall; Christina E Urso; Yiru Wang; Corinne Ramos; Kenneth Steadman; Michael J Pishvaian Journal: Cancer Date: 2015-01-29 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: Toni M Brand; Emily F Dunn; Mari Iida; Rebecca A Myers; Kellie T Kostopoulos; Chunrong Li; Chimera R Peet; Deric L Wheeler Journal: Cancer Biol Ther Date: 2011-09-01 Impact factor: 4.742
Authors: Shigeru Kawabata; M Christine Hollander; Jeeva P Munasinghe; Lauren R Brinster; José R Mercado-Matos; Jie Li; Lucia Regales; William Pao; Pasi A Jänne; Kwok-Kin Wong; John A Butman; Russell R Lonser; Marlan R Hansen; Richard K Gurgel; Alexander O Vortmeyer; Phillip A Dennis Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2015-05-10