PURPOSE: It has previously been shown that gefitinib-treated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification or high polysomy had a statistically significant improvement in response, time to progression, and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Only few studies utilizing anti-EGFR treatment in advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas have been performed and the results have been heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to evaluate EGFR-targeted therapy with gefitinib in esophageal adenocarcinoma with a high EGFR polysomy. METHODS: Novel esophageal cell lines PT6216 and LN6216c were established from primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of a patient with highly aggressive and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Pathological examination including tumor differentiation and prognostic marker analysis, immunohistochemical EGFR expression analysis, EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization, and mutation analysis were performed. Response of novel cell lines to gefitinib treatment was evaluated by cell proliferation and vitality assays. Fifty-four esophageal adenocarcinoma specimens were evaluated for EGFR gene copy gain. RESULTS: The primary tumor cell line PT6216 and the lymph node cell line LN6216c show a homogenously high polysomy for EGFR determined by FISH analysis. Cell proliferation and vitality are highly sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib compared to esophageal control cells without a high polysomy for EGFR. High polysomy for EGFR was found in 35 % of patients. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time a significant treatment response to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in esophageal tumor cells with a high polysomy for EGFR, suggesting a future role of anti-EGFR therapy for esophageal adenocarcinoma patients with a high EGFR polysomy.
PURPOSE: It has previously been shown that gefitinib-treated patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene amplification or high polysomy had a statistically significant improvement in response, time to progression, and survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Only few studies utilizing anti-EGFR treatment in advanced esophageal adenocarcinomas have been performed and the results have been heterogeneous. The aim of this study was to evaluate EGFR-targeted therapy with gefitinib in esophageal adenocarcinoma with a high EGFR polysomy. METHODS: Novel esophageal cell lines PT6216 and LN6216c were established from primary tumor and lymph node metastasis of a patient with highly aggressive and metastatic adenocarcinoma. Pathological examination including tumor differentiation and prognostic marker analysis, immunohistochemical EGFR expression analysis, EGFR fluorescence in situ hybridization, and mutation analysis were performed. Response of novel cell lines to gefitinib treatment was evaluated by cell proliferation and vitality assays. Fifty-four esophageal adenocarcinoma specimens were evaluated for EGFR gene copy gain. RESULTS: The primary tumor cell line PT6216 and the lymph node cell line LN6216c show a homogenously high polysomy for EGFR determined by FISH analysis. Cell proliferation and vitality are highly sensitive to the tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib compared to esophageal control cells without a high polysomy for EGFR. High polysomy for EGFR was found in 35 % of patients. CONCLUSION: We show for the first time a significant treatment response to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib in esophageal tumor cells with a high polysomy for EGFR, suggesting a future role of anti-EGFR therapy for esophageal adenocarcinomapatients with a high EGFR polysomy.
Authors: R Dziadziuszko; B Holm; B G Skov; K Osterlind; M V Sellers; W A Franklin; P A Bunn; M Varella-Garcia; F R Hirsch Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2006-11-02 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Stephanie J Gros; Thorsten Dohrmann; Kersten Peldschus; Paulus G Schurr; Jussuf T Kaifi; Tatyana Kalinina; Uta Reichelt; Oliver Mann; Tim G Strate; Gerhard Adam; Robert M Hoffman; Jakob R Izbicki Journal: Int J Cancer Date: 2010-06-01 Impact factor: 7.396
Authors: David R Ferry; Mark Anderson; Kate Beddard; Simon Tomlinson; Paul Atherfold; Jolanta Obszynska; Rebecca Harrison; Janusz Jankowski Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2007-10-01 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Charles T Miller; Justin R Moy; Lin Lin; Matthew Schipper; Daniel Normolle; Dean E Brenner; Mark D Iannettoni; Mark B Orringer; David G Beer Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Stephanie J Gros; Nina Kurschat; Astrid Drenckhan; Thorsten Dohrmann; Evelyn Forberich; Katharina Effenberger; Uta Reichelt; Robert M Hoffman; Klaus Pantel; Jussuf T Kaifi; Jakob R Izbicki Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-10-17 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Zihe Huo; Mariana Sá Santos; Astrid Drenckhan; Stefan Holland-Cunz; Jakob R Izbicki; Michael A Nash; Stephanie J Gros Journal: Cells Date: 2021-05-16 Impact factor: 6.600