Literature DB >> 19181695

A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level.

Gregory Króliczak1, Scott H Frey.   

Abstract

Evidence from neuropsychology and neuroimaging implicates parietal and frontal areas of the left cerebral hemisphere in the representation of skills involving the use of tools and other artifacts. On the basis of neuropsychological data, it has been claimed that 1) independent mechanisms within the left hemisphere may support the representation of these skills (transitive actions) versus meaningful gestures that do not involve manipulating objects (intransitive actions), and 2) both cerebral hemispheres may participate in the representation of intransitive gestures. Functional magnetic resonance imaging was used to test these hypotheses in 12 healthy adults while they planned and executed tool use pantomimes or intransitive gestures with their dominant right (Exp. 1) or nondominant left (Exp. 2) hands. Even when linguistic processing demands were controlled, planning either type of action was associated with asymmetrical increases in the same regions of left parietal (the intraparietal sulcus, supramarginal gyrus, and caudal superior parietal lobule) and dorsal premotor cortices. Effects were greater for tool use pantomimes, but only when the right hand was involved. Neither group nor individual analyses revealed evidence for greater bilateral activity during intransitive gesture planning. In summary, at the hand-independent level, transitive and intransitive actions are represented in a common, left-lateralized praxis network.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19181695      PMCID: PMC2742597          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhn261

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  73 in total

1.  Improved optimization for the robust and accurate linear registration and motion correction of brain images.

Authors:  Mark Jenkinson; Peter Bannister; Michael Brady; Stephen Smith
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Effects of noun-verb homonymy on the neural correlates of naming concrete entities and actions.

Authors:  Daniel Tranel; Coleman Martin; Hanna Damasio; Thomas J Grabowski; Richard Hichwa
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 2.381

3.  A neural system for learning about object function.

Authors:  Jill Weisberg; Miranda van Turennout; Alex Martin
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2006-03-31       Impact factor: 5.357

4.  Action-related properties shape object representations in the ventral stream.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Shawn C Milleville; Gioia A L Negri; Raffaella I Rumiati; Alfonso Caramazza; Alex Martin
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-08-02       Impact factor: 17.173

5.  Neural representations of pantomimed and actual tool use: evidence from an event-related fMRI study.

Authors:  J Hermsdörfer; G Terlinden; M Mühlau; G Goldenberg; A M Wohlschläger
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2007-03-31       Impact factor: 6.556

6.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Cognitive representations of hand posture in ideomotor apraxia.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Angela Sirigu; Myrna F Schwartz; Roberta Klatzky
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  The human dorsal stream adapts to real actions and 3D shape processing: a functional magnetic resonance imaging study.

Authors:  G Króliczak; T D McAdam; D J Quinlan; J C Culham
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 2.714

9.  Neural basis of pantomiming the use of visually presented objects.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Peter H Weiss; Tim Shallice; Giovanni Ottoboni; Johannes Noth; Karl Zilles; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 6.556

10.  An fMRI study of tool-use gestures: body part as object and pantomime.

Authors:  Yuko Ohgami; Kayako Matsuo; Nobuko Uchida; Toshiharu Nakai
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2004-08-26       Impact factor: 1.837

View more
  83 in total

1.  Individual and social learning processes involved in the acquisition and generalization of tool use in macaques.

Authors:  S Macellini; M Maranesi; L Bonini; L Simone; S Rozzi; P F Ferrari; L Fogassi
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2012-01-12       Impact factor: 6.237

2.  Interleaved practice enhances skill learning and the functional connectivity of fronto-parietal networks.

Authors:  Chien-Ho Janice Lin; Ming-Chang Chiang; Barbara J Knowlton; Marco Iacoboni; Parima Udompholkul; Allan D Wu
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 5.038

3.  Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects.

Authors:  Nicolas A McNair; Irina M Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-05-19       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Implementation of structure-mapping inference by event-file binding and action planning: a model of tool-improvisation analogies.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-06-05

5.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation of posterior parietal cortex affects decisions of hand choice.

Authors:  Flavio T P Oliveira; Jörn Diedrichsen; Timothy Verstynen; Julie Duque; Richard B Ivry
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-09-27       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Haptically Guided Grasping. fMRI Shows Right-Hemisphere Parietal Stimulus Encoding, and Bilateral Dorso-Ventral Parietal Gradients of Object- and Action-Related Processing during Grasp Execution.

Authors:  Mattia Marangon; Agnieszka Kubiak; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2016-01-05       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Neuropsychological perspectives on the mechanisms of imitation.

Authors:  Raffaella I Rumiati; Joana C Carmo; Corrado Corradi-Dell'Acqua
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 6.237

8.  The influence of goals on movement kinematics during imitation.

Authors:  Kelly S Wild; Ellen Poliakoff; Andrew Jerrison; Emma Gowen
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-10-14       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Probing for hemispheric specialization for motor skill learning: a transcranial direct current stimulation study.

Authors:  Heidi M Schambra; Mitsunari Abe; David A Luckenbaugh; Janine Reis; John W Krakauer; Leonardo G Cohen
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-05-25       Impact factor: 2.714

10.  Deficient supplementary motor area at rest: Neural basis of limb kinetic deficits in Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Stefanie Kübel; Katharina Stegmayer; Tim Vanbellingen; Sebastian Walther; Stephan Bohlhalter
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-05-02       Impact factor: 5.038

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.