Literature DB >> 22609901

Disentangling the contributions of grasp and action representations in the recognition of manipulable objects.

Nicolas A McNair1, Irina M Harris.   

Abstract

There is an increasing evidence that the action properties of manipulable objects can play a role in object recognition, as objects with similar action properties can facilitate each other's recognition [Helbig et al. Exp Brain Res 174:221-228, 2006]. However, it is unclear whether this modulation is driven by the actions involved in using the object or the grasps afforded by the objects, because these factors have been confounded in previous studies. Here, we attempted to disentangle the relative contributions of the action and grasp properties by using a priming paradigm in which action and grasp similarity between two objects were varied orthogonally. We found that target tools with similar grasp properties to the prime tool were named more accurately than those with dissimilar grasps. However, naming accuracy was not affected by the similarity of action properties between the prime and target tools. This suggests that knowledge about how an object is used is not automatically accessed when identifying a manipulable object. What are automatically accessed are the transformations necessary to interact directly with the object--i.e., the manner in which one grasps the object.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22609901     DOI: 10.1007/s00221-012-3116-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Exp Brain Res        ISSN: 0014-4819            Impact factor:   1.972


  29 in total

1.  Micro-affordance: the potentiation of components of action by seen objects.

Authors:  R Ellis; M Tucker
Journal:  Br J Psychol       Date:  2000-11

2.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

3.  Knowledge of object manipulation and object function: dissociations in apraxic and nonapraxic subjects.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum; Eleanor M Saffran
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.381

4.  Neural correlates of pantomiming familiar and unfamiliar tools: action semantics versus mechanical problem solving?

Authors:  Guy Vingerhoets; Elisabeth Vandekerckhove; Pieterjan Honoré; Pieter Vandemaele; Eric Achten
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2010-06-02       Impact factor: 5.038

5.  Manual asymmetries in visually primed grasping.

Authors:  Lari Vainio; Rob Ellis; Mike Tucker; Ed Symes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-02-18       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Conceptual and physical object qualities contribute differently to motor affordances.

Authors:  G Vingerhoets; K Vandamme; A Vercammen
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2008-11-28       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Object utilization and object usage: a single-case study.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Ghislaine Aubin; Philippe Allain; Christophe Jarry; Isabelle Richard; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Neurocase       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 0.881

Review 8.  Re-examining the gesture engram hypothesis. New perspectives on apraxia of tool use.

Authors:  François Osiurak; Christophe Jarry; Didier Le Gall
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2011-01-12       Impact factor: 3.139

9.  The Psychophysics Toolbox.

Authors:  D H Brainard
Journal:  Spat Vis       Date:  1997

10.  Distinctions between manipulation and function knowledge of objects: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Consuelo B Boronat; Laurel J Buxbaum; H Branch Coslett; Kathy Tang; Eleanor M Saffran; Daniel Y Kimberg; John A Detre
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2005-01-07
View more
  8 in total

1.  A priming study on naming real versus pictures of tools.

Authors:  Mutindi C Kithu; Elizabeth J Saccone; Sheila G Crewther; Melvyn A Goodale; Philippe A Chouinard
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2021-01-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Sinistrals are rarely "right": evidence from tool-affordance processing in visual half-field paradigms.

Authors:  Bartosz Michałowski; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-03-27       Impact factor: 3.169

3.  The affordance-matching hypothesis: how objects guide action understanding and prediction.

Authors:  Patric Bach; Toby Nicholson; Matthew Hudson
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-12       Impact factor: 3.169

4.  Is there a Competition between Functional and Situational Affordances during Action Initiation with Everyday Tools?

Authors:  Kévin Roche; Hanna Chainay
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2017-06-28

5.  So far so good: emotion in the peripersonal/extrapersonal space.

Authors:  Berenice Valdés-Conroy; Francisco J Román; Jose A Hinojosa; S Paul Shorkey
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-11-21       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effects of broken affordance on visual extinction.

Authors:  Melanie Wulff; Glyn W Humphreys
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.169

7.  Manipulation gesture effect in visual and auditory presentations: the link between tools in perceptual and motor tasks.

Authors:  Amandine E Rey; Kévin Roche; Rémy Versace; Hanna Chainay
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-22

8.  Co-lateralized bilingual mechanisms for reading in single and dual language contexts: evidence from visual half-field processing of action words in proficient bilinguals.

Authors:  Marlena Krefta; Bartosz Michałowski; Jacek Kowalczyk; Gregory Króliczak
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-08-07
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.