Literature DB >> 16581980

A neural system for learning about object function.

Jill Weisberg1, Miranda van Turennout, Alex Martin.   

Abstract

Does our ability to visually identify everyday objects rely solely on access to information about their appearance or on a more distributed representation incorporating other object properties? Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we addressed this question by having subjects visually match pictures of novel objects before and after extensive training to use these objects to perform specific tool-like tasks. After training, neural activity emerged in regions associated with the motion (left middle temporal gyrus) and manipulation (left intraparietal sulcus and premotor cortex) of common tools, whereas activity became more focal and selective in regions representing their visual appearance (fusiform gyrus). These findings indicate that this distributed network is automatically engaged in support of object identification. Moreover, the regions included in this network mirror those active when subjects retrieve information about tools and their properties, suggesting that, as a result of training, these previously novel objects have attained the conceptual status of "tools."

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16581980      PMCID: PMC1817810          DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhj176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  58 in total

1.  Clustering of perirhinal neurons with similar properties following visual experience in adult monkeys.

Authors:  C A Erickson; B Jagadeesh; R Desimone
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 24.884

2.  Actions speak louder than functions: the importance of manipulability and action in tool representation.

Authors:  Marion L Kellenbach; Matthew Brett; Karalyn Patterson
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-01-01       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 3.  The human visual cortex.

Authors:  Kalanit Grill-Spector; Rafael Malach
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 12.449

4.  Constraining questions about the organisation and representation of conceptual knowledge.

Authors:  Bradford Z Mahon; Alfonso Caramazza
Journal:  Cogn Neuropsychol       Date:  2003-05-01       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Neural representations of graspable objects: are tools special?

Authors:  Sarah H Creem-Regehr; James N Lee
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2004-11-24

Review 6.  The neurophysiological basis of motor imagery.

Authors:  J Decety
Journal:  Behav Brain Res       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.332

7.  Anatomic constraints on cognitive theories of category specificity.

Authors:  J T Devlin; C J Moore; C J Mummery; M L Gorno-Tempini; J A Phillips; U Noppeney; R S J Frackowiak; K J Friston; C J Price
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 6.556

8.  Neural correlates of category-specific knowledge.

Authors:  A Martin; C L Wiggs; L G Ungerleider; J V Haxby
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1996-02-15       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  Brain areas engaged during visual judgments by involuntary access to novel semantic information.

Authors:  Thomas W James; Isabel Gauthier
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.886

10.  FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects.

Authors:  Michael S Beauchamp; Kathryn E Lee; James V Haxby; Alex Martin
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2003-10-01       Impact factor: 3.225

View more
  76 in total

1.  Implementation of structure-mapping inference by event-file binding and action planning: a model of tool-improvisation analogies.

Authors:  Chris Fields
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2010-06-05

2.  Manipulability and object recognition: is manipulability a semantic feature?

Authors:  Fabio Campanella; Tim Shallice
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-11-27       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 3.  Human category learning 2.0.

Authors:  F Gregory Ashby; W Todd Maddox
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2010-12-23       Impact factor: 5.691

4.  A common network in the left cerebral hemisphere represents planning of tool use pantomimes and familiar intransitive gestures at the hand-independent level.

Authors:  Gregory Króliczak; Scott H Frey
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2009-01-30       Impact factor: 5.357

5.  Seeing what we know and understand: how knowledge shapes perception.

Authors:  Rasha Abdel Rahman; Werner Sommer
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2008-12

6.  Action semantics and movement characteristics engage distinct processing streams during the observation of tool use.

Authors:  Markus Hoeren; Christoph P Kaller; Volkmar Glauche; Magnus-Sebastian Vry; Michel Rijntjes; Farsin Hamzei; Cornelius Weiller
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Perceptual expertise with Chinese characters predicts Chinese reading performance among Hong Kong Chinese children with developmental dyslexia.

Authors:  Yetta Kwailing Wong; Christine Kong-Yan Tong; Ming Lui; Alan C-N Wong
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-01-22       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Accessing newly learned names and meanings in the native language.

Authors:  Annika Hultén; Minna Vihla; Matti Laine; Riitta Salmelin
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 5.038

9.  Moving the gesture engram into the 21st century.

Authors:  Laurel J Buxbaum
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  Feature diagnosticity affects representations of novel and familiar objects.

Authors:  Nina S Hsu; Margaret L Schlichting; Sharon L Thompson-Schill
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2014-05-06       Impact factor: 3.225

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.