Literature DB >> 19175099

Mechanically assisted 3D ultrasound guided prostate biopsy system.

Jeffrey Bax1, Derek Cool, Lori Gardi, Kerry Knight, David Smith, Jacques Montreuil, Shi Sherebrin, Cesare Romagnoli, Aaron Fenster.   

Abstract

There are currently limitations associated with the prostate biopsy procedure, which is the most commonly used method for a definitive diagnosis of prostate cancer. With the use of two-dimensional (2D) transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) for needle-guidance in this procedure, the physician has restricted anatomical reference points for guiding the needle to target sites. Further, any motion of the physician's hand during the procedure may cause the prostate to move or deform to a prohibitive extent. These variations make it difficult to establish a consistent reference frame for guiding a needle. We have developed a 3D navigation system for prostate biopsy, which addresses these shortcomings. This system is composed of a 3D US imaging subsystem and a passive mechanical arm to minimize prostate motion. To validate our prototype, a series of experiments were performed on prostate phantoms. The 3D scan of the string phantom produced minimal geometric distortions, and the geometric error of the 3D imaging subsystem was 0.37 mm. The accuracy of 3D prostate segmentation was determined by comparing the known volume in a certified phantom to a reconstructed volume generated by our system and was shown to estimate the volume with less then 5% error. Biopsy needle guidance accuracy tests in agar prostate phantoms showed that the mean error was 2.1 mm and the 3D location of the biopsy core was recorded with a mean error of 1.8 mm. In this paper, we describe the mechanical design and validation of the prototype system using an in vitro prostate phantom. Preliminary results from an ongoing clinical trial show that prostate motion is small with an in-plane displacement of less than 1 mm during the biopsy procedure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19175099     DOI: 10.1118/1.3002415

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Phys        ISSN: 0094-2405            Impact factor:   4.071


  22 in total

1.  Initial experience with electronic tracking of specific tumor sites in men undergoing active surveillance of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Christopher P Filson; Edward Chang; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J Margolis; Malu Macairan; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Robert E Reiter; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  Urol Oncol       Date:  2014-07-11       Impact factor: 3.498

2.  Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Yue Sun; Wu Qiu; Jing Yuan; Cesare Romagnoli; Aaron Fenster
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2015-06-24

3.  Precision of MRI/ultrasound-fusion biopsy in prostate cancer diagnosis: an ex vivo comparison of alternative biopsy techniques on prostate phantoms.

Authors:  N Westhoff; F P Siegel; D Hausmann; M Polednik; J von Hardenberg; M S Michel; M Ritter
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 4.226

4.  Three-dimensional ultrasound scanning.

Authors:  Aaron Fenster; Grace Parraga; Jeff Bax
Journal:  Interface Focus       Date:  2011-06-01       Impact factor: 3.906

Review 5.  Secondary Stroke Prevention: Improving Diagnosis and Management with Newer Technologies.

Authors:  Yahia Z Imam; Atlantic D'Souza; Rayaz A Malik; Ashfaq Shuaib
Journal:  Transl Stroke Res       Date:  2016-09-02       Impact factor: 6.829

6.  Simulation of autonomous robotic multiple-core biopsy by 3D ultrasound guidance.

Authors:  Kaicheng Liang; Albert J Rogers; Edward D Light; Daniel Von Allmen; Stephen W Smith
Journal:  Ultrason Imaging       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 1.578

Review 7.  Mixed reality ultrasound guidance system: a case study in system development and a cautionary tale.

Authors:  Golafsoun Ameri; John S H Baxter; Daniel Bainbridge; Terry M Peters; Elvis C S Chen
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 2.924

8.  Hybrid 2D-3D ultrasound registration for navigated prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Sonia-Yuki Selmi; Emmanuel Promayon; Jocelyne Troccaz
Journal:  Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg       Date:  2018-03-20       Impact factor: 2.924

9.  Targeted biopsy in the detection of prostate cancer using an office based magnetic resonance ultrasound fusion device.

Authors:  Geoffrey A Sonn; Shyam Natarajan; Daniel J A Margolis; Malu MacAiran; Patricia Lieu; Jiaoti Huang; Frederick J Dorey; Leonard S Marks
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  New agents and techniques for imaging prostate cancer.

Authors:  Atif Zaheer; Steve Y Cho; Martin G Pomper
Journal:  J Nucl Med       Date:  2009-08-18       Impact factor: 10.057

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.