Literature DB >> 26158111

Three-dimensional nonrigid landmark-based magnetic resonance to transrectal ultrasound registration for image-guided prostate biopsy.

Yue Sun1, Wu Qiu1, Jing Yuan1, Cesare Romagnoli2, Aaron Fenster3.   

Abstract

Registration of three-dimensional (3-D) magnetic resonance (MR) to 3-D transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) prostate images is an important step in the planning and guidance of 3-D TRUS guided prostate biopsy. In order to accurately and efficiently perform the registration, a nonrigid landmark-based registration method is required to account for the different deformations of the prostate when using these two modalities. We describe a nonrigid landmark-based method for registration of 3-D TRUS to MR prostate images. The landmark-based registration method first makes use of an initial rigid registration of 3-D MR to 3-D TRUS images using six manually placed approximately corresponding landmarks in each image. Following manual initialization, the two prostate surfaces are segmented from 3-D MR and TRUS images and then nonrigidly registered using the following steps: (1) rotationally reslicing corresponding segmented prostate surfaces from both 3-D MR and TRUS images around a specified axis, (2) an approach to find point correspondences on the surfaces of the segmented surfaces, and (3) deformation of the surface of the prostate in the MR image to match the surface of the prostate in the 3-D TRUS image and the interior using a thin-plate spline algorithm. The registration accuracy was evaluated using 17 patient prostate MR and 3-D TRUS images by measuring the target registration error (TRE). Experimental results showed that the proposed method yielded an overall mean TRE of [Formula: see text] for the rigid registration and [Formula: see text] for the nonrigid registration, which is favorably comparable to a clinical requirement for an error of less than 2.5 mm. A landmark-based nonrigid 3-D MR-TRUS registration approach is proposed, which takes into account the correspondences on the prostate surface, inside the prostate, as well as the centroid of the prostate. Experimental results indicate that the proposed method yields clinically sufficient accuracy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  magnetic resonance-transrectal ultrasound prostate registration; nonrigid registration; prostate biopsy; surface-based registration

Year:  2015        PMID: 26158111      PMCID: PMC4479588          DOI: 10.1117/1.JMI.2.2.025002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)        ISSN: 2329-4302


  35 in total

1.  Spatial transformation and registration of brain images using elastically deformable models.

Authors:  C Davatzikos
Journal:  Comput Vis Image Underst       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 3.876

2.  A spline-based non-linear diffeomorphism for multimodal prostate registration.

Authors:  Jhimli Mitra; Zoltan Kato; Robert Martí; Arnau Oliver; Xavier Lladó; Désiré Sidibé; Soumya Ghose; Joan C Vilanova; Josep Comet; Fabrice Meriaudeau
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2012-05-15       Impact factor: 8.545

3.  2D-3D rigid registration to compensate for prostate motion during 3D TRUS-guided biopsy.

Authors:  Tharindu De Silva; Aaron Fenster; Derek W Cool; Lori Gardi; Cesare Romagnoli; Jagath Samarabandu; Aaron D Ward
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and treatment of clinically localised disease.

Authors:  Axel Heidenreich; Joaquim Bellmunt; Michel Bolla; Steven Joniau; Malcolm Mason; Vsevolod Matveev; Nicolas Mottet; Hans-Peter Schmid; Theo van der Kwast; Thomas Wiegel; Filliberto Zattoni
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 20.096

5.  Evaluation of prostate segmentation algorithms for MRI: the PROMISE12 challenge.

Authors:  Geert Litjens; Robert Toth; Wendy van de Ven; Caroline Hoeks; Sjoerd Kerkstra; Bram van Ginneken; Graham Vincent; Gwenael Guillard; Neil Birbeck; Jindang Zhang; Robin Strand; Filip Malmberg; Yangming Ou; Christos Davatzikos; Matthias Kirschner; Florian Jung; Jing Yuan; Wu Qiu; Qinquan Gao; Philip Eddie Edwards; Bianca Maan; Ferdinand van der Heijden; Soumya Ghose; Jhimli Mitra; Jason Dowling; Dean Barratt; Henkjan Huisman; Anant Madabhushi
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2013-12-25       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Semi-automatic segmentation for prostate interventions.

Authors:  S Sara Mahdavi; Nick Chng; Ingrid Spadinger; William J Morris; Septimiu E Salcudean
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 8.545

7.  The sextant protocol for ultrasound-guided core biopsies of the prostate underestimates the presence of cancer.

Authors:  M Norberg; L Egevad; L Holmberg; P Sparén; B J Norlén; C Busch
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Optimization of prostate biopsy strategy using computer based analysis.

Authors:  M E Chen; P Troncoso; D A Johnston; K Tang; R J Babaian
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Initial clinical experience with real-time transrectal ultrasonography-magnetic resonance imaging fusion-guided prostate biopsy.

Authors:  Anurag K Singh; Jochen Kruecker; Sheng Xu; Neil Glossop; Peter Guion; Karen Ullman; Peter L Choyke; Bradford J Wood
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2007-12-05       Impact factor: 5.588

10.  Diagnostic yield of repeated transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsies stratified by specific histopathologic diagnoses and prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  C G Roehrborn; G J Pickens; J S Sanders
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 2.649

View more
  1 in total

1.  Real-time, image-based slice-to-volume registration for ultrasound-guided spinal intervention.

Authors:  T De Silva; A Uneri; X Zhang; M Ketcha; R Han; N Sheth; A Martin; S Vogt; G Kleinszig; A Belzberg; D M Sciubba; J H Siewerdsen
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2018-10-29       Impact factor: 3.609

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.