Literature DB >> 21428512

Masked detection and discrimination of tone sequences under conditions of monaural and binaural masking release.

Joseph W Hall1, Emily Buss, John H Grose.   

Abstract

Experiment 1 examined detection and discrimination of monaural four-tone sequences composed of 400-, 500-, and 625-Hz sinusoids. In the baseline conditions, the masker was monaural composed of 25-Hz-wide bands of random noise centered on 320, 400, 500, 625, and 781 Hz. In the binaural masking release conditions, the noise was presented diotically. In the monaural masking release conditions, the noise was presented to the same ear as the signal, but it was comodulated. Tones had half-amplitude durations of 30, 60, or 150 ms. There was no delay between successive tones, so the rate of frequency change depended on tone duration. Listeners discriminated between sequences composed of 500-400-625-500 Hz and 500-625-400-500 Hz. Discrimination results were poor for rapid sequences in both monaural and binaural masking release conditions relative to baseline conditions. Results from experiment 2 indicated that poor discrimination for rapid sequences could also occur in the baseline conditions, provided that the frequency separation among tonal components was small. Sluggish processing in the present paradigm was not restricted to conditions relying on binaural cues. It is argued that sluggishness may reflect a long temporal window in monaural and binaural masking release conditions or an interaction between poor cue quality and task difficulty.
© 2011 Acoustical Society of America

Mesh:

Year:  2011        PMID: 21428512      PMCID: PMC3078027          DOI: 10.1121/1.3552885

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  30 in total

1.  Binaural sluggishness in the perception of tone sequences and speech in noise.

Authors:  J F Culling; H S Colburn
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2000-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  The variation across time of sensitivity to interaural disparities: behavioral measurements and quantitative analyses.

Authors:  M A Akeroyd; L R Bernstein
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Auditory midbrain and nerve responses to sinusoidal variations in interaural correlation.

Authors:  Philip X Joris; Bram van de Sande; Alberto Recio-Spinoso; Marcel van der Heijden
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2006-01-04       Impact factor: 6.167

4.  Identification of temporal order in three-tone sequences.

Authors:  P L Divenyi; I J Hirsh
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  On the lag of lateralization caused by interaural time and intensity differences.

Authors:  J Blauert
Journal:  Audiology       Date:  1972 Sep-Dec

6.  Frequency discrimination and the MLD.

Authors:  C J Gebhardt; D P Goldstein; R M Robertson
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1972-04       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection in noise by spectro-temporal pattern analysis.

Authors:  J W Hall; M P Haggard; M A Fernandes
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1984-07       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Detectability of varying interaural temporal differences.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1978-02       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Prior stimulation and the masking-level difference.

Authors:  W A Yost
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1985-09       Impact factor: 1.840

10.  Detectability of a pulsed tone in the presence of a masker with time-varying interaural correlation.

Authors:  D W Grantham; F L Wightman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1979-06       Impact factor: 1.840

View more
  2 in total

1.  Frequency discrimination under conditions of comodulation masking release (L).

Authors:  Emily Buss; John H Grose; Joseph W Hall
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Perceiving sequential dependencies in auditory streams.

Authors:  Gerald Kidd; Christine R Mason; Timothy Streeter; Eric R Thompson; Virginia Best; Gregory H Wakefield
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 1.840

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.