Literature DB >> 11996308

Behavioral models of odor similarity.

Thomas A Cleland1, Alix Morse, Esther L Yue, Christiane Linster.   

Abstract

Carbon chain length in several classes of straight-chain aliphatic odorants has been proposed as a model axis of similarity for olfactory research, on the basis of successes of studies in insect and vertebrate species. To assess the influence of task on measured perceptual similarities among odorants and to demonstrate that the systematic similarities observed within homologous odorant series are not task specific, the authors compare 3 different behavioral paradigms for rats (olfactory habituation, generalization, and discrimination). Although overall patterns of odorant similarity are consistent across all 3 of these paradigms, both quantitative measurements of perceptual similarity and comparability with 2-deoxyglucose imaging data from the olfactory bulb are dependent on the specific behavioral tasks used. Thus, behavioral indices of perceptual similarity are affected by task parameters such as learning and reward associations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11996308     DOI: 10.1037//0735-7044.116.2.222

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 0735-7044            Impact factor:   1.912


  95 in total

1.  Experience modifies olfactory acuity: acetylcholine-dependent learning decreases behavioral generalization between similar odorants.

Authors:  Max L Fletcher; Donald A Wilson
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-01-15       Impact factor: 6.167

2.  Configurational and elemental odor mixture perception can arise from local inhibition.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Thomas A Cleland
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.621

3.  Distributed representation of chemical features and tunotopic organization of glomeruli in the mouse olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Limei Ma; Qiang Qiu; Stephen Gradwohl; Aaron Scott; Elden Q Yu; Richard Alexander; Winfried Wiegraebe; C Ron Yu
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Basal forebrain dynamics during nonassociative and associative olfactory learning.

Authors:  Sasha Devore; Nathaniel Pender-Morris; Owen Dean; David Smith; Christiane Linster
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-11-11       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Learning to smell the roses: experience-dependent neural plasticity in human piriform and orbitofrontal cortices.

Authors:  Wen Li; Erin Luxenberg; Todd Parrish; Jay A Gottfried
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2006-12-21       Impact factor: 17.173

6.  Effects of double and triple bonds on the spatial representations of odorants in the rat olfactory bulb.

Authors:  Brett A Johnson; Joan Ong; Kaman Lee; Sabrina L Ho; Spart Arguello; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  2007-02-01       Impact factor: 3.215

7.  Multiple learning parameters differentially regulate olfactory generalization.

Authors:  Thomas A Cleland; Venkata Anupama Narla; Karim Boudadi
Journal:  Behav Neurosci       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 1.912

8.  Fragile X mental retardation protein regulates olfactory sensitivity but not odorant discrimination.

Authors:  Arielle Schilit Nitenson; Emily E Stackpole; Torrey L S Truszkowski; Maellie Midroit; Justin R Fallon; Kevin G Bath
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2015-04-27       Impact factor: 3.160

9.  Perceptual stability during dramatic changes in olfactory bulb activation maps and dramatic declines in activation amplitudes.

Authors:  R Homma; L B Cohen; E K Kosmidis; S L Youngentob
Journal:  Eur J Neurosci       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.386

10.  Spontaneous versus reinforced olfactory discriminations.

Authors:  Christiane Linster; Brett A Johnson; Alix Morse; Esther Yue; Michael Leon
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2002-08-15       Impact factor: 6.167

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.