Literature DB >> 19164113

Effects of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy on the CT evaluation of resectability and staging in patients with pancreatic head cancer.

Yeo-Eun Kim1, Mi-Suk Park, Hye-Suk Hong, Chang Moo Kang, Jin-Young Choi, Joon Seok Lim, Woo Jung Lee, Myeong-Jin Kim, Ki Whang Kim.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of neoadjuvant combined chemotherapy and radiation therapy (CCRT) on preoperative accuracy of multidetector computed tomography (CT) for resectability and tumor staging in patients with pancreatic head cancer.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study received institutional review board approval and was exempted from informed consent requirements. From May 2002 to March 2007, 38 patients with pancreatic head adenocarcinoma underwent multidetector CT before surgery. Of these, 12 patients received neoadjuvant CCRT. Imaging findings were evaluated for tumor resectability and tumor staging. Surgical and pathologic results were used as the reference standard. The accuracy of resectability and individual components of each T category were compared between the patients with neoadjuvant CCRT and without it by using the chi(2) test or Fisher exact test. A P of less than .05 was considered as significant.
RESULTS: The accuracy in determining resectability was 83% (10 of 12) in patients who had received neoadjuvant CCRT and 81% (21 of 26) in patients who had not, without significant difference (P > .05). Of 32 patients who underwent pancreaticoduodenectomy, histopathologic tumor staging was reported for T1 (n = 2), T2 (n = 1), and T3 (n = 9) lesions in patents with neoadjuvant CCRT (n = 12), and for T3 in all patients without neoadjuvant CCRT (n = 20). T-staging accuracy was 67% (eight of 12) with neoadjuvant CCRT and 95% (19 of 20) without it, with a significant difference (P = .0185).
CONCLUSION: Neoadjuvant CCRT reduces the accuracy of tumor restaging after treatment of pancreatic head cancer, but this effect is not so great as to affect the determination of resectability. RSNA, 2009

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19164113     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2502080501

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  19 in total

1.  Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Detected Extramural Venous Invasion in Rectal Cancer before and after Preoperative Chemoradiotherapy: Diagnostic Performance and Prognostic Significance.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Min Ju Kim; Sung Chan Park; Bo Yun Hur; Jong Hee Hyun; Hee Jin Chang; Ji Yeon Baek; Sun Young Kim; Dae Yong Kim; Jae Hwan Oh
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2017-08-07       Impact factor: 5.315

2.  Surgery after FOLFIRINOX treatment for locally advanced and borderline resectable pancreatic cancer: increase in tumour attenuation on CT correlates with R0 resection.

Authors:  Giovanni Marchegiani; Valentina Todaro; Enrico Boninsegna; Riccardo Negrelli; Binit Sureka; Debora Bonamini; Roberto Salvia; Riccardo Manfredi; Roberto Pozzi Mucelli; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 5.315

3.  Prognostic value of MRI in assessing extramural venous invasion in rectal cancer: multi-readers' diagnostic performance.

Authors:  Jae Seok Bae; Se Hyung Kim; Bo Yun Hur; Won Chang; Juil Park; Hye Eun Park; Jung Ho Kim; Hyo-Jin Kang; Mi Hye Yu; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 5.315

4.  NeoGemTax: gemcitabine and docetaxel as neoadjuvant treatment for locally advanced nonmetastasized pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Klaus Sahora; Irene Kuehrer; Martin Schindl; Claus Koelblinger; Peter Goetzinger; Michael Gnant
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-07       Impact factor: 3.352

5.  Surgical resectability of pancreatic adenocarcinoma: CTA.

Authors:  Jimmie C Wong; Steven Raman
Journal:  Abdom Imaging       Date:  2009-05-26

6.  CT prediction of resectability and prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma after neoadjuvant treatment using image findings and texture analysis.

Authors:  Bo Ram Kim; Jung Hoon Kim; Su Joa Ahn; Ijin Joo; Seo-Youn Choi; Sang Joon Park; Joon Koo Han
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2018-06-21       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 7.  Multimodality imaging of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Shailesh V Shrikhande; Savio George Barreto; Mahesh Goel; Supreeta Arya
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2012-06-14       Impact factor: 3.647

8.  Implementation of a strategic preoperative surgical meeting to improve the level of care at a high-volume pancreatic center: a before-after analysis of 1000 consecutive cases.

Authors:  Niccolò Surci; Marco Ramera; Alex Borin; Giovanni Marchegiani; Roberto Salvia; Claudio Bassi
Journal:  Updates Surg       Date:  2020-02-05

9.  The Role of CT in Assessment of Extraregional Lymph Node Involvement in Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Authors:  Dorine S J Tseng; Bobby K Pranger; Maarten S van Leeuwen; Jan Pieter Pennings; Lodewijk A Brosens; Nadja Haj Mohammad; Vincent E de Meijer; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Joris I Erdmann; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer       Date:  2021-03-19

10.  Preoperative CT predictors of survival in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma undergoing curative intent surgery.

Authors:  Shannan M Dickinson; Caitlin A McIntyre; Juliana B Schilsky; Kate A Harrington; Scott R Gerst; Jessica R Flynn; Mithat Gonen; Marinela Capanu; Winston Wong; Sharon Lawrence; Peter J Allen; Eileen M O'Reilly; William R Jarnagin; Michael I D'Angelica; Vinod P Balachandran; Jeffrey A Drebin; T Peter Kingham; Amber L Simpson; Richard K Do
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2020-09-28
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.