Literature DB >> 33817647

The Role of CT in Assessment of Extraregional Lymph Node Involvement in Pancreatic and Periampullary Cancer: A Diagnostic Accuracy Study.

Dorine S J Tseng1, Bobby K Pranger1, Maarten S van Leeuwen1, Jan Pieter Pennings1, Lodewijk A Brosens1, Nadja Haj Mohammad1, Vincent E de Meijer1, Hjalmar C van Santvoort1, Joris I Erdmann1, I Quintus Molenaar1.   

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of CT in assessing extraregional lymph node metastases in pancreatic head and periampullary cancer. Materials and
Methods: This prospective observational cohort study was performed at two tertiary hepatopancreatobiliary (HPB) referral centers between March 2013 and December 2014. Patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy or bypass surgery with or without palliative radiofrequency ablation were included. Extraregional lymph node involvement was defined as positive lymph nodes in the aortocaval window. Two expert HPB radiologists assessed aortocaval lymph nodes at preoperative CT according to a standardized protocol. All tissue from the aortocaval window was collected intraoperatively. Positive histopathologic finding was the reference standard. Analysis of predictive values and diagnostic accuracy was performed.
Results: A total of 198 consecutive patients (mean age, 66 years; range, 39-86 years; 105 men) with pancreatic head or periampullary carcinoma were included. In 70% of patients, a pancreatoduodenectomy was performed, 4% underwent total pancreatectomy, 4% underwent radiofrequency ablation, and 22% underwent bypass surgery. Forty-four patients (22%) had histologically positive aortocaval lymph nodes. Negative predictive value of CT in assessing aortocaval lymph nodes was 80% for both observers, and positive predictive value was 31%-33%. Overall diagnostic accuracy was 69%-70%.
Conclusion: CT has a low diagnostic accuracy in assessing extraregional lymph node metastases in patients suspected of having pancreatic or periampullary cancer.Keywords: CT, Abdomen/GI, Pancreas, Oncology© RSNA, 2021. 2021 by the Radiological Society of North America, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abdomen/GI; CT; Oncology; Pancreas

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33817647      PMCID: PMC8011448          DOI: 10.1148/rycan.2021200014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Imaging Cancer        ISSN: 2638-616X


  24 in total

1.  Preoperative assessment of para-aortic lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Hisashi Imai; Ryuichiro Doi; Hiroyuki Kanazawa; Naoko Kamo; Masayuki Koizumi; Toshihiko Masui; Yasuhiro Iwanaga; Yoshiya Kawaguchi; Yasutsugu Takada; Hiroyoshi Isoda; Shinji Uemoto
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Comparison of CT and MRI for presurgical characterization of paraaortic lymph nodes in patients with pancreatico-biliary carcinoma.

Authors:  Young-Chul Kim; Mi-Suk Park; Seung-Whan Cha; Yong-Eun Chung; Joon-Suk Lim; Kyung-Sik Kim; Myeong-Jin Kim; Ki-Whang Kim
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2008-04-14       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of CT in assessing extra-regional lymphadenopathy in pancreatic and peri-ampullary cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Dorine S J Tseng; Hjalmar C van Santvoort; Samira Fegrachi; Marc G Besselink; Nicolaas P A Zuithoff; Inne H Borel Rinkes; Maarten S van Leeuwen; I Quintus Molenaar
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2014-10-31       Impact factor: 3.279

4.  Predicting lymph node metastasis in pancreatobiliary cancer with magnetic resonance imaging: A prospective analysis.

Authors:  Ju Hee Lee; Sung-Sik Han; Eun Kyung Hong; Hwa Jin Cho; Jungnam Joo; Eun Young Park; Sang Myung Woo; Tae Hyun Kim; Woo Jin Lee; Sang-Jae Park
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2019-04-15       Impact factor: 3.528

5.  A Comprehensive Assessment of Accurate Lymph Node Staging and Preoperative Detection in Resected Pancreatic Cancer.

Authors:  Toshiro Masuda; Amanda M Dann; Irmina A Elliott; Hideo Baba; Stephen Kim; Alireza Sedarat; V Raman Muthusamy; Mark D Girgis; O Joe Hines; Howard A Reber; Timothy R Donahue
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2017-10-17       Impact factor: 3.452

6.  Regression modelling strategies for improved prognostic prediction.

Authors:  F E Harrell; K L Lee; R M Califf; D B Pryor; R A Rosati
Journal:  Stat Med       Date:  1984 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.373

7.  Comparison of multislice computed tomography and endoscopic ultrasonography with operative and histological findings in suspected pancreatic and periampullary malignancy.

Authors:  S D Mansfield; J Scott; K Oppong; D L Richardson; G Sen; B C Jaques; D M Manas; R M Charnley
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2008-12       Impact factor: 6.939

8.  Curative resection is the single most important factor determining outcome in patients with pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Authors:  M Wagner; C Redaelli; M Lietz; C A Seiler; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 6.939

9.  A prospective diagnostic accuracy study of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography, multidetector row computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in primary diagnosis and staging of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Saila P Kauhanen; Gaber Komar; Marko P Seppänen; Kirsti I Dean; Heikki R Minn; Sami A Kajander; Irina Rinta-Kiikka; Kalle Alanen; Ronald J Borra; Pauli A Puolakkainen; Pirjo Nuutila; Jari T Ovaska
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed tomography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  John DeWitt; Benedict Devereaux; Melissa Chriswell; Kathleen McGreevy; Thomas Howard; Thomas F Imperiale; Donato Ciaccia; Kathleen A Lane; Dean Maglinte; Kenyon Kopecky; Julia LeBlanc; Lee McHenry; James Madura; Alex Aisen; Harvey Cramer; Oscar Cummings; Stuart Sherman
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2004-11-16       Impact factor: 25.391

View more
  1 in total

1.  Value of Clinical Information on Radiology Reports in Oncological Imaging.

Authors:  Felix Schön; Rebecca Sinzig; Felix Walther; Christoph Georg Radosa; Heiner Nebelung; Maria Eberlein-Gonska; Ralf-Thorsten Hoffmann; Jens-Peter Kühn; Sophia Freya Ulrike Blum
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-30
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.