Literature DB >> 19158259

First evaluation of the WASP, a new automated microbiology plating instrument.

Paul P Bourbeau1, Brandi Lynn Swartz.   

Abstract

Many laboratories are experiencing growing shortages of trained microbiology technologists and technicians. Consequently, there is considerable interest in new automation that could potentially lessen labor demands for specimen processing. In this study, we present the first published evaluation of a new microbiology instrument, the Walk Away Specimen Processor (WASP), manufactured by Copan, Inc., in which we evaluated cross-contamination, the accuracy of plating, and the quality of the results. The absence of cross-contamination was demonstrated by plating a total of 200 alternating inoculated and sterile specimen tubes. The ability of the WASP to subculture enrichment broths was evaluated with 106 Lim broth specimens, with the results being identical to those obtained by testing by routine methods. Plating of urine specimens with the WASP was compared to plating with the Dynacon Inoculab instrument. Three hundred specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 1-microl loops, and 293 specimens were plated in duplicate on both instruments with 10-microl loops. The results of duplicate plating with the same instrument (replicate plating) and of the consensus agreement between the two instruments were compared. The replicate plating results were comparable for both instruments, while the WASP had more specimens with significant results than the Inoculab with the 1-microl loop only. Lastly, for the plating of 113 specimens in ESwab tubes, the manual method and WASP plating each yielded 90 potential pathogens. In summary, we report the first evaluation of a new microbiology specimen-plating instrument, the WASP, which offers opportunities for the automated plating of microbiology specimens to an extent that has not been possible to date.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19158259      PMCID: PMC2668317          DOI: 10.1128/JCM.01963-08

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Microbiol        ISSN: 0095-1137            Impact factor:   5.948


  5 in total

1.  Asymptomatic infections of the urinary tract.

Authors:  E H KASS
Journal:  Trans Assoc Am Physicians       Date:  1956

2.  Evaluation of an Automated Instrument for Inoculating and Spreading Samples onto Agar Plates.

Authors:  J H Glasson; L H Guthrie; D J Nielsen; F A Bethell
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2008-02-13       Impact factor: 5.948

3.  Evaluation of an automated agar plate streaker.

Authors:  R C Tilton; R W Ryan
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Accuracy of calibrated-loop transfer.

Authors:  A C Albers; R D Fletcher
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  Diagnosis of coliform infection in acutely dysuric women.

Authors:  W E Stamm; G W Counts; K R Running; S Fihn; M Turck; K K Holmes
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1982-08-19       Impact factor: 91.245

  5 in total
  17 in total

1.  Comparison of five media for detection of extended-spectrum Beta-lactamase by use of the wasp instrument for automated specimen processing.

Authors:  P Grohs; B Tillecovidin; A Caumont-Prim; E Carbonnelle; N Day; I Podglajen; L Gutmann
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-05-22       Impact factor: 5.948

2.  Comparison of Inoculation with the InoqulA and WASP Automated Systems with Manual Inoculation.

Authors:  Antony Croxatto; Klaas Dijkstra; Guy Prod'hom; Gilbert Greub
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 3.  Automation in clinical microbiology.

Authors:  Paul P Bourbeau; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-03-20       Impact factor: 5.948

4.  Clinical evaluation of the walk-away specimen processor and ESwab for recovery of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates in prenatal screening specimens.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Wendy J Olson; Tami-Lea A Mackey; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 5.948

5.  The automated clinical microbiology laboratory: fact or fantasy?

Authors:  Nathan A Ledeboer; Steven D Dallas
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 6.  Emerging technologies for the clinical microbiology laboratory.

Authors:  Blake W Buchan; Nathan A Ledeboer
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-10       Impact factor: 26.132

7.  Comparison of FecalSwab and ESwab devices for storage and transportation of Diarrheagenic bacteria.

Authors:  Jari J Hirvonen; Suvi-Sirkku Kaukoranta
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2014-04-16       Impact factor: 5.948

8.  Automated versus manual sample inoculations in routine clinical microbiology: a performance evaluation of the fully automated InoqulA instrument.

Authors:  P Froment; H Marchandin; P Vande Perre; B Lamy
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 5.948

9.  Clinical evaluation of the Copan ESwab for methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus detection and culture of wounds.

Authors:  V Saegeman; J Flamaing; J Muller; W E Peetermans; J Stuyck; J Verhaegen
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-02-06       Impact factor: 3.267

10.  Performance of Copan WASP for Routine Urine Microbiology.

Authors:  Chantal Quiblier; Marion Jetter; Mark Rominski; Forouhar Mouttet; Erik C Böttger; Peter M Keller; Michael Hombach
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2015-12-16       Impact factor: 5.948

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.