Literature DB >> 19154906

Early and late outcomes in minimally invasive mitral valve repair: an eleven-year experience in 707 patients.

R Scott McClure1, Lawrence H Cohn, Esther Wiegerinck, Gregory S Couper, Sary F Aranki, R Morton Bolman, Michael J Davidson, Frederick Y Chen.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study analyzes a single institution experience with minimally invasive mitral valve repair and evaluates long-term surgical outcomes of morbidity, mortality, and rates of reoperation. Late follow-up of mitral regurgitation and left ventricular function were also assessed.
METHODS: Between August 1996 and October 2007, minimally invasive mitral valve repair was performed in 713 patients (mean follow-up 5.7 years). Excluding 6 repairs with robotic assistance, an perspective analysis of the remaining 707 patients was carried forth. Mean age was 57 +/- 13 years. Mean preoperative ejection fraction was 60% +/- 10%. Surgical access was through a lower ministernotomy (74%), right parasternal incision (24%), right thoracotomy (1.4%), or upper ministernotomy (0.7%). Exposure of the mitral valve was through the left atrium in 58% of the cases and transeptal in 42%. A ring annuloplasty was incorporated into 680 (96%) of 707 repairs. The Kaplan-Meier and Student t test for paired samples were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There were 3 (0.4%) operative deaths. Perioperative morbidity included new-onset atrial fibrillation (20%), reoperation for bleeding (2%), stroke (1.9%), permanent pacemaker implantation (1.7%), deep sternal wound infection (0.7%), and aortic dissection (0.4%). Median hospital stay was 5 days. Only 31% of patients required blood transfusion during the hospital course. There were 49 (6.9%) late deaths and 34 (4.8%) failed repairs necessitating reoperation. At 11.2 years, survival was 83% (95% confidence intervals, 76.5-88.1); freedom from reoperation was 92% (95% confidence intervals, 86.2-94.9). Nine (1.3%) patients were lost to follow-up. A total of 2369 patient-years of echocardiography time were obtained in 544 patients (mean 4.36 years, range 0.47-11.09). Mean grade of mitral regurgitation decreased from 3.80 to 1.42 (P < .0001) Mean left ventricular ejection fraction decreased from 60.7% to 56.3% (P < .0001). Combined risk of death, reoperation, and recurrence of moderately severe to severe mitral regurgitation was 7.7% (43/555).
CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive mitral valve repair is safe, with low perioperative morbidity, low rates of recurrent mitral regurgitation, and low rates of reoperation and death at late follow-up.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19154906     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.08.058

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  30 in total

Review 1.  Minimally invasive heart valve surgery: how and why in 2012.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Nassir M Thalji
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Early results of minimally invasive mitral valve surgery: initial series in a public hospital in Australia.

Authors:  Tadashi Kitamura; James Edwards; Michael Worthington; Kaushalendra S Rathore; Manoranjan Misra; E K Slimani; G V Ramana Kumar; John Stubberfield; Robert G Stuklis
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2010-11-11

3.  Minimally Invasive Mitral Valve Surgery via Mini-Thoracotomy: Current Update.

Authors:  Serguei I Melnitchouk; Jacob P Dal-Bianco; Michael A Borger
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-11

Review 4.  Evolution of the concept and practice of mitral valve repair.

Authors:  Lawrence H Cohn; Vakhtang Tchantchaleishvili; Taufiek K Rajab
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-07

5.  Robotic mitral valve repair for all categories of leaflet prolapse: improving patient appeal and advancing standard of care.

Authors:  Rakesh M Suri; Harold M Burkhart; Kent H Rehfeldt; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano; Richard C Daly; Eric E Williamson; Zhuo Li; Hartzell V Schaff
Journal:  Mayo Clin Proc       Date:  2011-07-14       Impact factor: 7.616

6.  Two Different Minimally Invasive Techniques for Female Patients with Atrial Septal Defects: Totally Thoracoscopic Technique and Right Anterolateral Thoracotomy Technique.

Authors:  Ming Xu; Shaoping Zhu; Xianguo Wang; Hua Huang; Jinping Zhao
Journal:  Ann Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-05-25       Impact factor: 1.520

7.  Outcomes of video-assisted minimally invasive approach through right mini-thoracotomy for resection of benign cardiac masses; compared with median sternotomy.

Authors:  Sadanari Sawaki; Toshiaki Ito; Atsuo Maekawa; Satoshi Hoshino; Yasunari Hayashi; Junji Yanagisawa; Masayosi Tokoro; Takahiro Ozeki
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2014-08-02

Review 8.  Percutaneous and surgical treatment of mitral valve regurgitation.

Authors:  Joerg Seeburger; Hugo A Katus; Sven T Pleger; Ulrike Krumsdorf; Friedrich-Wilhelm Mohr; Raffi Bekeredjian
Journal:  Dtsch Arztebl Int       Date:  2011-12-02       Impact factor: 5.594

9.  Posterior ventricular anchoring neochordal repair of degenerative mitral regurgitation efficiently remodels and repositions posterior leaflet prolapse.

Authors:  Y Joseph Woo; John W MacArthur
Journal:  Eur J Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2013-02-28       Impact factor: 4.191

10.  Eight-year experience with minimally invasive cardiothoracic surgery.

Authors:  Alexander Iribarne; Anna Karpenko; Mark J Russo; Faisal H Cheema; Faisal Cheema; Tianna Umann; Mehmet C Oz; Craig R Smith; Michael Argenziano
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-04       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.