Literature DB >> 19150094

Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy.

Sandip M Prasad1, Marcos Ferreria, Alexander M Berry, Stuart R Lipsitz, Jerome P Richie, Atul A Gawande, Jim C Hu.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Currently objective perioperative risk assessment metrics are lacking for radical cystectomy. Using a simple 10-point scale similar to neonatal Apgar assessment we evaluated whether a surgical outcome score calculated immediately after radical cystectomy would predict major complications and mortality.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified 155 consecutive radical cystectomies performed between 2005 and 2007 at our institution. Data were collected on 45 preoperative and intraoperative variables. We used a framework established by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program to evaluate major complications within 30 days of surgery. We used a 10-point scoring system that had been previously validated in general and vascular surgery populations, comprising estimated blood loss, lowest heart rate and lowest mean arterial pressure.
RESULTS: A total of 40 (26%) patients undergoing radical cystectomy experienced a major complication within 30 days of the operation. There was a progressive decrease in complications with increasing surgical Apgar score, in that patients with a low vs a high Apgar score were more likely to experience complications (OR 6.9, 95% CI 1.9-24.2). Coronary artery disease, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, intraoperative blood transfusion, volume of intravenous fluid administered and female gender were also associated with major complications (p <0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing radical cystectomy the surgical Apgar score predicts major postoperative complications and death. This simple and objective postoperative metric may be used to dictate the intensity of care. Prospective studies are needed to determine whether treatment decisions based on this scoring system improve radical cystectomy outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19150094     DOI: 10.1016/j.juro.2008.10.165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  18 in total

1.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in a district general hospital.

Authors:  Christopher C Thorn; Melanie Chan; Nihal Sinha; Richard A Harrison
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2012-05       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Editorial comment.

Authors:  Michele Pavone-Macaluso
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 2.370

3.  Evaluating the utility of a preoperative nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality following radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

Authors:  Jennifer M Taylor; Andrew Feifer; Caroline J Savage; Alexandra C Maschino; Melanie Bernstein; Harry W Herr; S Machele Donat
Journal:  BJU Int       Date:  2011-07-01       Impact factor: 5.588

4.  Can the Surgical Apgar Score predict morbidity and mortality in general orthopaedic surgery?

Authors:  Julio Urrutia; Macarena Valdes; Tomas Zamora; Valentina Canessa; Jorge Briceno
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Evaluation of the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Universal Surgical Risk Calculator for a gynecologic oncology service.

Authors:  J Brian Szender; Peter J Frederick; Kevin H Eng; Stacey N Akers; Shashikant B Lele; Kunle Odunsi
Journal:  Int J Gynecol Cancer       Date:  2015-03       Impact factor: 3.437

6.  Surgical Apgar score predicts perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy at a high-volume center.

Authors:  M Mura Assifi; John Lindenmeyer; Benjamin E Leiby; Zvi Grunwald; Ernest L Rosato; Eugene P Kennedy; Charles J Yeo; Adam C Berger
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-10-27       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Combining the ASA Physical Classification System and Continuous Intraoperative Surgical Apgar Score Measurement in Predicting Postoperative Risk.

Authors:  Monika Zdenka Jering; Khensani N Marolen; Matthew S Shotwell; Jason N Denton; Warren S Sandberg; Jesse Menachem Ehrenfeld
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2015-09-10       Impact factor: 4.460

8.  Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Andrew C Prince; Kristine E Day; Chee Paul Lin; Benjamin J Greene; William R Carroll
Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  2018-06-05       Impact factor: 3.497

9.  Improvement of the Surgical Apgar Score by Addition of Intraoperative Blood Transfusion Among Patients Undergoing Major Gastrointestinal Surgery.

Authors:  Aslam Ejaz; Faiz Gani; Steven M Frank; Timothy M Pawlik
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-08-12       Impact factor: 3.452

10.  Use of the surgical Apgar score to guide postoperative care.

Authors:  J B Haddow; H Adwan; S E Clark; S Tayeh; S S Antonowicz; P Jayia; D W Chicken; T Wiggins; R Davenport; S Kaptanis; M Fakhry; C H Knowles; A S Elmetwally; E Geddoa; M S Nair; I Naeem; S Adegbola; L J Muirhead
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 1.891

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.