Literature DB >> 29870298

Utility of the Surgical Apgar Score in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Andrew C Prince1, Kristine E Day2, Chee Paul Lin3, Benjamin J Greene2, William R Carroll2.   

Abstract

Objectives To recognize the utility of the surgical Apgar score (SAS) in a noncutaneous head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) population. Study Design Retrospective case series with chart review. Setting Academic tertiary medical center. Subjects and Methods Patients (n = 563) undergoing noncutaneous HNSCC resection between April 2012 and March 2015 were included. Demographics, medical history, intraoperative data, and postoperative hospital summaries were collected. SASs were calculated following the published schema. The primary outcome was 30-day postoperative morbidity. A 2-sample t test, analysis of variance, and χ2 (or Fisher exact) test were used for statistical comparisons. A multivariable logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify independent predictors of 30-day morbidity. Results Mean SAS was 6.2 ± 1.5. SAS groups did not differ in age, sex, or race. Sixty-five patients (11.6%) had a SAS between 0 and 4, with 40 incidences of morbidity (61.5%), while 31 (5.5%) patients with SAS from 9 to 10 had 3 morbidity occurrences (9.7%). Results show that 30-day postoperative morbidity is inversely related to increasing SAS ( P < .0001). Furthermore, lower SAS was associated with significantly increased operative time (SAS 0-4: 9.3 ± 2.6 hours vs SAS 9-10: 3.0 ± 1.1 hours) and lengths of stay (SAS 0-4: 10.0 ± 7.3 days vs SAS 9-10: 1.6 ± 1.0 days), P < .0001. SAS remained highly significant after adjusting for potential confounding variables in the multivariable analysis ( P < .0001). Conclusions An increasing SAS is associated with significantly lower rates of 30-day postoperative morbidities in a noncutaneous HNSCC patient population.

Entities:  

Keywords:  head and neck cancer; postoperative morbidity; squamous cell carcinoma; surgical Apgar score; surgical outcomes

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29870298      PMCID: PMC6659718          DOI: 10.1177/0194599818767626

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg        ISSN: 0194-5998            Impact factor:   3.497


  22 in total

1.  A proposal for a new method of evaluation of the newborn infant.

Authors:  V APGAR
Journal:  Curr Res Anesth Analg       Date:  1953 Jul-Aug

2.  An Apgar score for surgery.

Authors:  Atul A Gawande; Mary R Kwaan; Scott E Regenbogen; Stuart A Lipsitz; Michael J Zinner
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2006-12-27       Impact factor: 6.113

3.  Psychometric properties of the Persian version of the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index addendum for PTSD (PSQI-A).

Authors:  Jeiran Farrahi; Nouzar Nakhaee; Vahid Sheibani; Behshid Garrusi; Ahmad Amirkafi
Journal:  Sleep Breath       Date:  2008-11-21       Impact factor: 2.816

4.  Surgical apgar outcome score: perioperative risk assessment for radical cystectomy.

Authors:  Sandip M Prasad; Marcos Ferreria; Alexander M Berry; Stuart R Lipsitz; Jerome P Richie; Atul A Gawande; Jim C Hu
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2009-01-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 5.  Cancer cachexia update in head and neck cancer: Definitions and diagnostic features.

Authors:  Marion E Couch; Kim Dittus; Michael J Toth; Monte S Willis; Denis C Guttridge; Jonathan R George; Christie A Barnes; Christine G Gourin; Hirak Der-Torossian
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 3.147

6.  Application of the Surgical Apgar Score to Microvascular Head and Neck Reconstruction.

Authors:  Kyle S Ettinger; Eric J Moore; Christine M Lohse; Matthew D Reiland; Jacob G Yetzer; Kevin Arce
Journal:  J Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2016-02-26       Impact factor: 1.895

7.  Treatment choice for locally advanced head and neck cancers on the basis of risk factors: biological risk factors.

Authors:  B J M Braakhuis; R H Brakenhoff; C René Leemans
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 32.976

8.  The Surgical Apgar Score in esophagectomy.

Authors:  Christopher F Janowak; Justin D Blasberg; Lauren Taylor; James D Maloney; Ryan A Macke
Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2015-07-10       Impact factor: 5.209

9.  Utility of the surgical apgar score: validation in 4119 patients.

Authors:  Scott E Regenbogen; Jesse M Ehrenfeld; Stuart R Lipsitz; Caprice C Greenberg; Matthew M Hutter; Atul A Gawande
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  2009-01

10.  The apgar score and infant mortality.

Authors:  Fei Li; Ting Wu; Xiaoping Lei; Hao Zhang; Meng Mao; Jun Zhang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  1 in total

1.  Surgical Apgar score is strongly associated with postoperative ICU admission.

Authors:  Ying-Chun Lin; Yi-Chun Chen; Chen-Hsien Yang; Nuan-Yen Su
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 4.379

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.