OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Isbarn nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality following radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1141 consecutive radical cystectomy patients treated at our institution between 1995 and 2005 with at least 90 days of follow-up. We applied the published nomogram to our cohort, determining its discrimination, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration. We further compared it with a simple model using age and the Charlson comorbidity score. RESULTS: Our cohort was similar to that used to develop the Isbarn nomogram in terms of age, gender, grade and histology; however, we observed a higher organ-confined (≤pT2, N0) rate (52% vs 24%) and a lower overall 90-day mortality rate [2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.9%, 3.9%) vs 3.9%]. The Isbarn nomogram predicted individual 90-day mortality in our cohort with moderate discrimination [AUC 73.8% (95% confidence interval 64.4%, 83.2%)]. In comparison, a model using age and Charlson score alone had a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 70.2% (95% confidence interval 67.2%, 75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The Isbarn nomogram showed moderate discrimination in our cohort; however, the exclusion of important preoperative comorbidity variables and the use of postoperative pathological stage limit its utility in the preoperative setting. The use of a simple model combining age and Charlson score yielded similar discriminatory ability and underscores the significance of individual patient variables in predicting outcomes. An accurate tool for predicting postoperative morbidity/mortality following radical cystectomy would be valuable for treatment planning and counselling. Future nomogram design should be based on preoperative variables including individual risk factors, such as comorbidities.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the performance of the Isbarn nomogram for predicting 90-day mortality following radical cystectomy in a contemporary series. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We identified 1141 consecutive radical cystectomy patients treated at our institution between 1995 and 2005 with at least 90 days of follow-up. We applied the published nomogram to our cohort, determining its discrimination, with the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), and calibration. We further compared it with a simple model using age and the Charlson comorbidity score. RESULTS: Our cohort was similar to that used to develop the Isbarn nomogram in terms of age, gender, grade and histology; however, we observed a higher organ-confined (≤pT2, N0) rate (52% vs 24%) and a lower overall 90-day mortality rate [2.8% (95% confidence interval 1.9%, 3.9%) vs 3.9%]. The Isbarn nomogram predicted individual 90-day mortality in our cohort with moderate discrimination [AUC 73.8% (95% confidence interval 64.4%, 83.2%)]. In comparison, a model using age and Charlson score alone had a bootstrap-corrected AUC of 70.2% (95% confidence interval 67.2%, 75.4%). CONCLUSIONS: The Isbarn nomogram showed moderate discrimination in our cohort; however, the exclusion of important preoperative comorbidity variables and the use of postoperative pathological stage limit its utility in the preoperative setting. The use of a simple model combining age and Charlson score yielded similar discriminatory ability and underscores the significance of individual patient variables in predicting outcomes. An accurate tool for predicting postoperative morbidity/mortality following radical cystectomy would be valuable for treatment planning and counselling. Future nomogram design should be based on preoperative variables including individual risk factors, such as comorbidities.
Authors: Brent K Hollenbeck; David C Miller; David Taub; Rodney L Dunn; Shukri F Khuri; William G Henderson; James E Montie; Willie Underwood; John T Wei Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-10 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Joseph A Mitchell; Matthew R Cooperberg; Eric P Elkin; Deborah P Lubeck; Shilpa S Mehta; Christopher J Kane; Peter R Carroll Journal: J Urol Date: 2005-04 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Marcus L Quek; John P Stein; Siamak Daneshmand; Gus Miranda; Duraiyah Thangathurai; Peter Roffey; Eila C Skinner; Gary Lieskovsky; Donald G Skinner Journal: J Urol Date: 2006-03 Impact factor: 7.450
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Jinhai Huo; Yiyi Chu; Jacques G Baillargeon; Timothy Daskivich; Yong-Fang Kuo; Christopher D Kosarek; Simon P Kim; Eduardo Orihuela; Douglas S Tyler; Stephen J Freedland; Ashish M Kamat Journal: Urology Date: 2017-08-25 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Reza Mehrazin; Zachary Piotrowski; Brian Egleston; Daniel Parker; Jeffrey J Tomaszweski; Marc C Smaldone; Philip H Abbosh; Timothy Ito; Paul Bloch; Kevan Iffrig; Marijo Bilusic; David Y T Chen; Rosalia Viterbo; Richard E Greenberg; Robert G Uzzo; Alexander Kutikov Journal: Urology Date: 2014-10-24 Impact factor: 2.649
Authors: Stephen B Williams; Ashish M Kamat; Karim Chamie; Michael Froehner; Manfred P Wirth; Peter N Wiklund; Peter C Black; Gary D Steinberg; Stephen A Boorjian; Sia Daneshmand; Peter J Goebell; Kamal S Pohar; Shahrokh F Shariat; George N Thalmann Journal: Eur Urol Oncol Date: 2018-06-06